If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
It still portends big things to come very soon.
Why would the Cabal play the "imposter Q" card unless they're taking fire?
It'd be better to never play that card at all, in my opinion.
I'm 50/50 still. Next week's events might make things a little bit clearer as to who/what this Q is.
Yeah and Im pretty much 50/50 too but def going to looking critically after a year and a half.
I dont put it past them to play a card, stupidly especially after an enormous victory like RvW.
It also could be neither Q nor cabal, but a loony site owner.
I think real Q posted 6/24.
this Q talks like a fag and his shits all retarded
My first wife was 'tarded... she's a pilot now!
Cautiously optimistic, with discerning scrutiny, going forward.
Same....
?
They know time is almost up for them
Options are running low
There are more than two players here. Just because it is not Q does not mean it is the cabal. Some players have interests we may not yet know about. I remain skeptical until clear proofs surface. Do your own research and look in places outside of your usual sources.
It's not black and white. I'm not saying I don't think this is the real Q. I think it's good to be cautious but optimistic. However this could also just be a case of "pay"triots hijacking to make $$$.
it doesn't have to be the cabal that is doing this. It probably is not.
I was reading several messages earlier on 8kun where some autists believe the guys that did this were banned from qresearch for good 6 months ago, and one of them is an old board op. I didn't see any of this at the time - wasn't paying attention - so if I get the details mixed up I did the best I could. I believe they said this is the whole babyfist thing where he posted on Q's private board, and got banned. Now he is butthurt and is acting like Q is posting (with Jim's help).
I don't know if this is the answer or not - it's just what I read earlier.
Maybe as a lab experiment to see how we react. There are academic well funded groups watching us here I am almost certain. They are studying what kind of post are made, and what the reaction to them is. All of this is being done so they can learn how to manipulate us
If you don't believe this, just look at what they did with the voat dataset, here, and what their conclusions were.
Look at section: 8 Conclusion
Notice that elsewhere there are references to reddit, and 4chan.
Is the Cabal the only entity with a justifiable interest in manipulating Q supporters and the capability of doing so through the chan?
Not everybody with hostile intentions are on the same side against you. Just like how not every sympathetic voice is necessarily “on your side.” The world is far more complicated than that.
It would take a lot of resources for someone to hijack the tripcodes.
I'm outright dismissing any which don't bear the original tripcode at the moment, as everyone should until further verification. The TOR posts should be ignored until proven otherwise.
This is not the first time they've attempted to dupe us with fake Q posts, but it is the first where there has been monkeying with the tripcode salt.
Q is posting on 8kun. 4Chan effectively kicked him off when the mods refused to provide tripcode protections. Selection of mods was thought to be more secure on 8kun
I never made that claim.
Consider the landscape. If this was just like any other fake Q, why the media coverage? This time is different because it caused the MSM to expend resources to announce Q's supposed return with mainstream articles.
https://www.google.com/search?q=q+returns&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjopKjJsNP4AhWyQzABHWj2DdkQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1920&bih=955&dpr=1
The Cabal, specifically, have proven a financial interest in promoting these Q posts.
So, yes... There is hostile intent behind these posts from the same group of people behind all MSM outlets. That's the Cabal I'm referring to -- the same 6 companies behind all National media outlets.
It would take a lot of resources for some people. Not everyone.
I can’t imagine why anyone would think that. Moderator selection is as simple as clicking a button. There is no formal process for moderator applications beyond what the site administrator has decided.
So Q and Q supporters trusted Watkins to provide moderator protection worthy of something as important as the Plan? Why? Who on earth would trust him for such an important task?
Are chans really too difficult for the Q Team to have set up their own, that they fully controlled and secured? We wouldn’t be dealing with this problem right now if Q wasn’t relying on the 8chan administrator as his gatekeeper.
I’ve discussed this before. The outside world, the media, and so forth are not concerned about Q or his predictions. Very few people from the outside even know what those predictions are.
The outside world keeps an eye on Q people because they worry what happens when the Plan fails to come to fruition.
Lie or not, Q-adjacent beliefs are considered partly to blame for Jan 6th by the outside world. Everyone knows what the “ammo box” is.
If the Q team never shows up to execute all these alleged pedophilic Satanist cannibals, do Q people give up and consider that maybe they were misled, and that these politicians, while despicable, may not be responsible for what Q and Trump suggested?
If not, then THAT is why the media is going to breathlessly report on the Q movement, rather than Q’s words. Because Q’s words are less important to the outside world than the actions and influence of the people who believe the story he told.
We don't know. There's been no clear answer to that question, from Q or any other. On 8chan, Q trusted CM (CodeMonkeyZ, Ron Watkins) enough to pat him on the back:
https://qalerts.app/?n=474
u/#q474
Q only required mods not have any operational control over the thread.
So long as the BO kept his nose clean, there seemed to be no issue.
If Q themselves set it up, there would be no anonymity. Q can't have a paper trail to function. Plausible Deniability must be maintained. If Q were a Military Operation, revealing certain details about the government would be treason, regardless of clearance level. That's why the Chans were the chosen platform to begin with, because they allowed full anonymity and laxness in censorship.
Q has made only a few predictions, and the vast majority of them very early on. The majority of Q posts are questions which demand Anons find answers for themselves. If Anons make predictions, they aren't Q's predictions.
Look for yourself. Read Q's last 3000 posts and spot a bonafide prediction with a set date. All this talk of dates "coming and going" are BS. Just because something hasn't happened yet, doesn't mean it won't happen. I'm tired of people using that same failed argument of "none of Q's predictions come true." Which ones? Give me a few to reference.
The truth is, no one bothers to read the posts to verify whether Q has made a single prediction. The argument is a fabrication of the "Qanon" strawman the MSM push.
Do you know the phrase "Military is the only way?"
How many times has Q ever said that phrase?
https://qalerts.app/?q=military+is+the+only+way
ZERO times. Yet it's thrown around here like bread and butter.
The only reference that comes close is this one:
https://qalerts.app/?n=26
Every time I see someone say "Military is the only way" I know for a fact they are listening to the MSM strawman, not actually referring to Q posts. Q has ALWAYS said TRANSPARENCY is the only way. Not the military.
https://qalerts.app/?q=transparency+is+the+only+way
That people are still falling for it is starting to piss me off, honestly.
That still doesn't answer my question:
"Why NOW?"
Why are the media choosing NOW to cover Q's return, when there have been previous "returns" from imposters since his absence?
What story did Q tell? Honestly, tell me what you think, because I have no idea what you think Q has said, so I cannot confirm or deny your stance's validity on the matter.