Remember the last time Q re-confirmed their identity after a salt refresh?
(media.greatawakening.win)
✅ - PROOF - ✅
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
The most disturbing thing to me about the new drops is that 'Q' told anons to "Remember your oath".
No military leader would ever insult their subordinates in this way by calling into question their loyalty to the constitution.
When Q used this expression in the past it was directed at specific people within government who they knew to have been witness to or complicit in traitorous activity. This was Q's way of encouraging them to cooperate/testify in order to redeem themselves and their agency.
The way in which this expression was used in a recent 'Q' drop is incredibly ignorant and a terrible insult to the patriots who dedicate their time to The Great Awakening. But whoever wrote the drops is too dumb to even realize that and they think they're being clever re-hashing Q's previous expressions.
Yes, that totally rubbed me the wrong way when I first read it, and that was when I was thinking it was Q. Now I am doubly sus.
Devils advocate says how do you know who that statement was directed to?
Exactly. Reminding black hats the penalties of treason.
Fair point. I remain skeptical, but not in any way convinced either way.
Not trying to offend anyone, but this drop came around the time Breaking News Now or whatever posted something about the Pentagon not accepting Roe being overturned.
I took the oath reminder to be a warning that the domestic enemies were about to be testing their allegiance.
How does remember your oath call into question their loyalty to constitution.
See the previous Q drops that use this expression: https://qagg.news/?q=remember+your+oath
It's an expression Q uses to send a message when there is danger of someone potentially following an unconstitutional order, disobeying the chain of command, or to encourage testimony from someone who has information about "enemies foreign or domestic" that they need to formally report (not doing so would effectively be betraying their oath – failing to protect their country).
It's not something that needs to be 'reminded' to loyal (digital) soldiers who are serving admirably.
See also Q drops re: "You have a choice. Do what is right." which is another way Q conveys this same message.
When you're about to leave the house and you turn and tell your teenager, "remember you promised to (x)," are you not admonishing them because you think they're going to fail to live up to the commitment?
I mean sure u can make it seem negative. However I dont think it has to be a negative thing. If someone said that to me I wouldnt take it wrong. I would take it as them pumping us up and helping us remained focused on task ahead.
Remember your oath points to a video of admiral Mike Roger's taking the oath.
Mike Roger's being the guy who blew the whistle at the nsa on trumps spying.
Qppost 4430literally says remember your oath https://qposts.online/post/4430
Yes, this was to inspire others within government as Rogers is the perfect example of someone who risked their career to 'blow the whistle' and in doing so uphold his oath by protecting the incoming president from enemies domestic (Brennan, Clapper, Comey, etc).
Remember, digital soldiers only begun taking the oath in late June 2020. The reason this was encouraged by Q was to send a message to those within government who might have been nervous about providing testimony against members of the deep state.
Q told anons to "take the oath' on June 24, 2020, after they had already sent the "remember your oath" message x4. "RYO" has never been a message directed at anons.
It's about the new 2A law ... stay tuned ... not good