The hits keep coming - Supreme Court rules 5-4 states can be sued for discriminating against Veterans
(media.greatawakening.win)
🪖 𝐕𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐍 𝐖𝐈𝐍 🪖
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (84)
sorted by:
Frankly I think military service should remain voluntary, but be required to vote. Every TV brainwashed idiot with absolutely no stake in the country being able to vote is just silly.
That said, this ruling really wasn't about veterans, it was about states not getting sued over federal legislation. In that case, I do agree that this ruling wasn't good.
can you eli5 for me what this ruling actually does please?
I actually think it's a terrible ruling because its not just about veterans. I made a comment yesterday a out it. I knew damn well when I read the ruling that people were going to only look at the veteran side of it and not think ahead.
This case boils down to the Federal government being able to make a law way after the constitution was ratified, USERRA is the rights act in this case, that contradicts what the states originally agreed to.
The states NEVER would have ratified the constitution if the federal government could suddenly make a law and say, if you don't follow this new law, then the individual in your state can sue you."
I believe this is the federal government overreaching and contradicting the constitution as ratified.
Nice, somebody else who actually read and understood what was going on. Good work fren. Seems most everyone else here got suckered by the clickbait headline.
Can I ask a stupid question? Wouldn't land owners only, ban people who live in apartments from being able to vote? Or people who were landowners, but lost their house due to natural disaster and are having to live with someone else thereby making them not a land owner?
Banning people who live in apartments from voting seems like it'd ban a lot of trump supporters/conservatives since there are a lot of trump supporters/conservatives who don't have their own place. What about people currently serving in the military wouldn't they be banned as well since they don't own any land? Land owners only seems to be a bad way to vote. Not to mention there are a lot of "sheep" who are land owners. Land owners only voting wouldn't guarantee conservatives winning elections since as I said there are a lot of Democrats/sheep who are land owners idk if they outnumber conservatives or not, but you'd be taking a lot of votes away from conservatives