But does perjury work with a "I heard from someone, who heard from someone, who heard from someone else" type of situation? Because if I recall, that's what this was.
Hutchinson didn't even see this happen first hand, she said that a secret service agent told her it happened. That's hearsay, and not something she can swear to. She can swear someone told her, but can't swear it happened, because she didn't see it.
So that makes her testimony useless and hearsay. It is an obvious attempt at attention seeking. She wants to help with the smear campaign against President Trump.
I just really want to see and hear the criticism of the way the committee has been conducted. This looks more and more like a "witch trial" why are so many willing to stick their heads in the sand and give J6 committee legitimacy.
I suspect the one named goldentoilet is a shill. Probably a groomer. Supports baby murder. Paid by Soros perhaps to try and counter the truth of Hutchinson.
This is the least important detail she testified to, and made clear she was recalling what she was told, not what she personally witnessed. The ONLY people who could contradict her testimony are Ornato or Engle, no one else. And since this story seems to insinuate it's not them, this is pointless.
Don’t we still have a thing called perjury?
You have to first have a fair court and a jury that objects to being lied to.
The Democrat Un-select committee absorbs lies every day. They don't care, so long as the "right people" are the ones lying.
The partisan sham is court-fluid. Their powers fluctuate based on their feelings about certain information.
But does perjury work with a "I heard from someone, who heard from someone, who heard from someone else" type of situation? Because if I recall, that's what this was.
bUT mUh TuCKeR!!!
Hutchinson didn't even see this happen first hand, she said that a secret service agent told her it happened. That's hearsay, and not something she can swear to. She can swear someone told her, but can't swear it happened, because she didn't see it.
Next Smolletta (Hutchinson) will be saying that Trump is an evil space alien.
No. They will just say they HEARD he was a space alien, and the media will run with it.
Maybe Smolletta will say that her best friend's boyfriend's cousin heard that he was an evil space alien.
She didn’t testify that she witnessed the episode in the SUV. She recounted what she had been told.
So that makes her testimony useless and hearsay. It is an obvious attempt at attention seeking. She wants to help with the smear campaign against President Trump.
Right. These committees have no power and are all stage
I just really want to see and hear the criticism of the way the committee has been conducted. This looks more and more like a "witch trial" why are so many willing to stick their heads in the sand and give J6 committee legitimacy.
I suspect the one named goldentoilet is a shill. Probably a groomer. Supports baby murder. Paid by Soros perhaps to try and counter the truth of Hutchinson.
HINT: There will a rash of Arkancide that only afflicts SS agents.
I’m sure the January 6th committee has seen footage of this incident! More than likely all presidential vehicles have interior cameras.
This is the least important detail she testified to, and made clear she was recalling what she was told, not what she personally witnessed. The ONLY people who could contradict her testimony are Ornato or Engle, no one else. And since this story seems to insinuate it's not them, this is pointless.
Leans into mic. Wrong.
What exactly do you think "wrong" in my comment?