Great, then he should go right ahead and log into 8-Kun and tell us that they hacked Q’s actual trip code.
Scientists worldwide have spent billions creating various models for hydrogen based fusion. They have proof of concept models, but guess what, fusion still doesn’t work.
I’m willing to admit that for technical administrative reasons that one or both of the Watkins might have been asked to be an actual part of the Q team. They may have had access to some inside information but I don’t think they were the ones typing out the messages on the board.
Being part of that team, I don’t think the Watkins just now made an independent decision to go ahead and fraudulently post as Q.
The Watkins may be competent computer experts but they were never trained as elite operators for psychological operations. And even the best hackers could never gain access to all the inside information that they had.
And for those people who think the Watkins have been running Q team all by themselves independently since the beginning, that assumes that Trump is some type of dumbass who bought into a hacker run psy-op without ever using his executive powers to check it out.
So you’re either accusing the Watkins of being liars or too stupid to know who’s posting on their servers.
With respect Zeitreise, while he isn't articulating very well, raver9876 has a valid point (as do you).
I believe this is a fairly silly argument. While yes, an emulated proof of concept is nice, Iit proves nothing. It isn't the exact same build with the same tweaks, plug-ins, feature sets, and code base as the actual site.
The Anon doesn't have the access.
All this post proves is ignorance.
Give me a copy of windows or Linux a web app sitting on a lamp stack, whatever, and I too can show you how easy it is to hack and duplicate lab results, compromising security in a controlled environment.
With respect to the anon trying to prove something, this really only proves the code can be duplicated. We knew that already, at least some of us did.
About all this does is devide us.
We should wait and look for more posts, but in the meantime continue to take action as we know must be done.
Some vague statements that sound kinda like Q doesn't matter and there was no critical evidence, direction, or instructions dropped yet, so the new posts don't matter.
If they do in the future we'll address them then, as you say.
For now, I agree. If this kind of thing were to be valuable, it would need to be on the live server. Until then, stop bickering and fall back into line!
Man those meme cannons you frogs! Seek local leadership and get involved! Nothing more to see here, get back to work!
Great, then he should go right ahead and log into 8-Kun and tell us that they hacked Q’s actual trip code.
Scientists worldwide have spent billions creating various models for hydrogen based fusion. They have proof of concept models, but guess what, fusion still doesn’t work.
I repeat, “Put up or shut up.”
Oh so now we’re back to accusing Jim Watkins or Ron Watkins of being Q?
No, they're being accused of faking being Q.
And the real Q team is just gonna put up with that?
I’m willing to admit that for technical administrative reasons that one or both of the Watkins might have been asked to be an actual part of the Q team. They may have had access to some inside information but I don’t think they were the ones typing out the messages on the board.
Being part of that team, I don’t think the Watkins just now made an independent decision to go ahead and fraudulently post as Q.
The Watkins may be competent computer experts but they were never trained as elite operators for psychological operations. And even the best hackers could never gain access to all the inside information that they had.
And for those people who think the Watkins have been running Q team all by themselves independently since the beginning, that assumes that Trump is some type of dumbass who bought into a hacker run psy-op without ever using his executive powers to check it out.
So you’re either accusing the Watkins of being liars or too stupid to know who’s posting on their servers.
With respect Zeitreise, while he isn't articulating very well, raver9876 has a valid point (as do you).
I believe this is a fairly silly argument. While yes, an emulated proof of concept is nice, Iit proves nothing. It isn't the exact same build with the same tweaks, plug-ins, feature sets, and code base as the actual site.
The Anon doesn't have the access. All this post proves is ignorance.
Give me a copy of windows or Linux a web app sitting on a lamp stack, whatever, and I too can show you how easy it is to hack and duplicate lab results, compromising security in a controlled environment.
With respect to the anon trying to prove something, this really only proves the code can be duplicated. We knew that already, at least some of us did.
About all this does is devide us.
We should wait and look for more posts, but in the meantime continue to take action as we know must be done.
Some vague statements that sound kinda like Q doesn't matter and there was no critical evidence, direction, or instructions dropped yet, so the new posts don't matter. If they do in the future we'll address them then, as you say.
For now, I agree. If this kind of thing were to be valuable, it would need to be on the live server. Until then, stop bickering and fall back into line!
Man those meme cannons you frogs! Seek local leadership and get involved! Nothing more to see here, get back to work!
He doesn't understand software development. He has decided to be aggressive with you rather than admit that.