The Holocaust: Historical Truth Goes By Evidence Not Emotion
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
Dozens of teams of scientists have performed chemical analysis on soil, wall and structure samples of the gas chamber showers at Auschwitz and Dachau prison camps and found no residual chemical evidence of any deadly chemicals.
It's been forensic proven, dozens of times, that those showers were normal hot water showers and never used to gas anyone.
These tests were repeated because none of the teams could believe their findings, yet they all proved the same thing: the gas chamber showers of Auschwitz and Dachau were nothing more than fictional wartime propaganda.
This has been known since the 1950s.
The latch door to the crem in Auschwitz could be opened from the inside! It was close to the infirmary / officer's quarters, and the "chimney" only reached to the first floor.
Then how the Soviets came in after fabricated the chimney, the ceiling hole to make it look like it was how they did it.
The Germans meticulous record keeping and not enough supplies where brought in to cremate the bodies.
The number of Jews that were gassed are continually going down, revising due to evidence against it happening.
The amount of incinerators and how many bodies to burn per hour is unrealistic at best.
Jewish prisoners testimony that were in the camp saying they had never saw the gas chambers or heard of the gassing.
Zionists supporting Jews saying all the myriad ways they disposed of the bodies, like digging a ditch and using bodies to set alight other bodies.
The list goes on more than I can remember, but it's the worse thing they can say about Hitler bit if it never happened was he really that bad?
Bear in mind that there were huge payouts to Jewish victims. This is the motherload of misery fiction, movies etc. People forget Schindler's list was a work of FICTION - many visit the "factory" where it was filmed as though it was based on fact. The genius scene in the film was that of the survivors placing stones at Schindler's memorial, made it all so real.
I seem to remember the incinerators being on a higher floor too - imagine hauling so many bodies up and the time it would have taken to incinerate them in those tiny ovens, which were used to burn lice infested hair and clothes. Modern crematoriums take a long while to burn a body at very high temps - how long would those have taken?
Exactly, some of the camps the incinerators were on a different floor and would of took a lot longer, though time is the enemy for the Holocaust believers so they have to ignore a lot of things to make it all fit.
Like they get around the time it takes to burn a body (2hrs) by saying that they put 3 bodies in at a time, but that makes no sense as it will take over 3 times as long. Also 3 bodies wouldn't fit through the door.
They have no reasonable answers to any of the disputes raised but all they can say is it happened and it's racist to disagree and only we can be right.
Why did Eisenhower force so many German civilians to tour and disassemble the camps/bury leftover bodies? Was General Eisenhower some kind of secret agent for the Jews?
Further, the only area at Auschwitz that shows actual cyanide traces is the clothes delousing chamber- which shows massive cyanide residue- the walls being stained blue from Iron hexacyanoferrate (Prussian Blue) which is formed when Zyklon B chemically interacts with the iron in red brick.
I strongly believe there where never any homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. For more on this, look into Historian David Irving- he blew my mind when I started watching his talks.
One of the major points he makes, is that there is/was ( not sure how many folks from that era are still with us) a major business in the "Holocaust" , with Germany paying out billions in reparations to the nation of Israel, and to survivors. This means that there is a vested, financial interest in keeping the narrative going.
Further, a truly interesting fact is that no archeological excavation is allowed at or near any of the camps, and denial of the official narrative is a crime in most european countries.
I personally believe there are two reasons for this- one to continue the established narrative. Two, to prevent an even darker truth from being discovered- that the Nazii nuclear program was very advanced ( the Zinsser Affadavit among other evidence.points to this) and some camps used prisoners as disposable labor in nuclear enrichment ( the camps part is conjecture).
Side note- we do know the germans invented and manufacturedTabun and Sarin nerve gasses during the war as well.
When the history of WW2 is fully known, I believe the world will be shaken. I believe the real history is very different from what we have been told.
Edit- Disclaimer: I am neither anti semitic or pro Nazi. I am pro truth, and against the killing of innocents and non-combatants of any origin.
Even more fun fact about Zyklon B and the color blue: if you were asphyxiated/poisoned to death that way (an incredibly inefficient chemical for such an efficient people to chose for said purpose), their bodies would have also turned bright blue.
Of course, the original myth makers didn't know this and there is not one single detail of stacks of blue bodies being taken from the gas chambers. No mention of blue corpses? Wouldn't that kind of image really stick in your mind?
Anyway...
roman catholic lies from the bottom of the pit^^
https://ia800300.us.archive.org/30/items/Air_Photo_Evidence/Air_Photo_Evidence.pdf