They think they're clever with this BS. What's the context? Credit Hawley for giving a sane answer, but why is a professor asking a senator questions like this? Hearing of some sort?
Herein lies the thing we fight: lefties play word games. They manipulate language to create an alternate reality advantageous for them, and then try to trap everyone else inside the confusion.
I think people are fed up with this silly-ness. Lefties are exhausting everyone with this shit, frustrating to be around, blind to their own stupidity, and ignorant of their shocking smallness.
From a game plan perspective, where else can they go? They are seemingly out of ideas once this idiocy plays out...
What if I told you English itself is a fictional language who definitions are owned by the queen whose courts also invented another foreign language called "legalease" which is also a fictional language.
Why fictional? Well, the second yiu have multiple meanings of words, changes in the meaning of words over time amd made uo new words (ebonics etc) you have a fake language that is unstable and useless for conveying truth.
Contracts use legalese, tell me you truly have understood all the contracts you have signed? It's deliberate and legally, the fixtional.langyage rendered all contracts fraudulent by deceptive language.
Quantum grammar on blockchain. All lawyers get to learn to code amd we get to handle our own contracts and using quantum English do it in a truthful way. Ironclad.
Some day we will get the chance to opt out of the queens guild of legal obfuscation and lawyers will make minimum wage as a secretary should. All they are is highly trained clerks. Most not even very bright.
I remember hearing the name of the guy that allegedly "discovered" that, but aside from the legalese bullshit used today enforced by Britain, I find "quantum English" to be kinda silly.
Tell me whatbexacybyiy understand about quantum English. It's mathematical and always means what it says. No private interpretation by some corrupt judge 5 years down the line.
1 Corinthians 1:18
The message of the cross is foolish to those who are headed for destruction! But we who are being saved know it is the very power of God.
They think they're clever with this BS. What's the context? Credit Hawley for giving a sane answer, but why is a professor asking a senator questions like this? Hearing of some sort?
Herein lies the thing we fight: lefties play word games. They manipulate language to create an alternate reality advantageous for them, and then try to trap everyone else inside the confusion.
I think people are fed up with this silly-ness. Lefties are exhausting everyone with this shit, frustrating to be around, blind to their own stupidity, and ignorant of their shocking smallness.
From a game plan perspective, where else can they go? They are seemingly out of ideas once this idiocy plays out...
What if I told you English itself is a fictional language who definitions are owned by the queen whose courts also invented another foreign language called "legalease" which is also a fictional language.
Why fictional? Well, the second yiu have multiple meanings of words, changes in the meaning of words over time amd made uo new words (ebonics etc) you have a fake language that is unstable and useless for conveying truth.
Contracts use legalese, tell me you truly have understood all the contracts you have signed? It's deliberate and legally, the fixtional.langyage rendered all contracts fraudulent by deceptive language.
Quantum grammar on blockchain. All lawyers get to learn to code amd we get to handle our own contracts and using quantum English do it in a truthful way. Ironclad.
Some day we will get the chance to opt out of the queens guild of legal obfuscation and lawyers will make minimum wage as a secretary should. All they are is highly trained clerks. Most not even very bright.
I remember hearing the name of the guy that allegedly "discovered" that, but aside from the legalese bullshit used today enforced by Britain, I find "quantum English" to be kinda silly.
Tell me whatbexacybyiy understand about quantum English. It's mathematical and always means what it says. No private interpretation by some corrupt judge 5 years down the line.
Leaving aside legalese, how is it different from the English we use today?
1 Corinthians 1:18 The message of the cross is foolish to those who are headed for destruction! But we who are being saved know it is the very power of God.
Why do we havr these hearings at all. Pointless
So they can hear themselves talk and oat each others backs for being so educated and sophisticated. It is called vanity.
They prioritize questions over answers.
Sea lion’ing