π Look who all is scheduled to give responses today in the Trump v Clinton Case.
(PatriotAU)
π₯ B O O O O O M π₯
ABC Corporations
Kevin Clinesmith
Hillary Clinton
James Comey
DNC Services Corporation
Igor Danchenko
Democratic National Committee
Marc Elias
Fusion GPS
Rodney Joffre
Andrew McCabe
Robert Mook
Neustar Security Services
Nellie Ohr
Lisa Page
Perkins Coie, LLC
John Podesta
Rod Rosenstein
Adam Schiff
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Christopher Steele
Peter Strzok
Jake Sullivan
Michael Sussman
(And this isnβt the full list!) π
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63184300/trump-v-clinton/?page=2
There is another twist to this as well. Here is a quote from the Westfall Act, as quoted in the US Govt's motion from your link:
What can stop Trump from amending the suit and adding the Attorney General as part of the conspiracy? Garland knows they weren't acting on the govt's behalf - they were part of a conspiracy against Trump. Now, so is Garland by the simple act of trying to cover it up and get it thrown out. According to what the govt. said in their own motion only the Attorney General can use this act. If Trump can add him as part of the conspiracy there doesn't appear to be anyone else that can call that act. (I'm not a lawyer so correct me if I'm wrong).
Could that have been Trump's intention all along?
Great analysis. Thank you for that addition u/dec3169 ππ»
Looks like the government admitting that all these feds followed orders and did their jobs.
Who gave the orders?
Was it "The United States of America" that gave the order?
Was there someone above these treasonous feds that acted outside their duties?
So if I'm reading the tea leaves correctly, they think the Westfall government corruption protection Act is going to save their asses?
We are not talking about conduct that was merely wrongful or negligent.
We are talking about overt criminal acts.
Immunity does not cover crimes.