Mockingbird gonna mock. Basically saying " Stay out of the way of our terrorism / fear agenda, Accept death, & T2A is useless" .
Point is that armed citizens do save people, and themselves. They also fail to mention how often does an armed citizen add to the carnage. Almost never.
So what's the problem ? The " good guy w/ a gun " stories emboldens the people and destroys their " guns are Bad " narratives.
Damn people are stupid. Banning guns on property does not protect ANYONE. Since when do these idiots think that criminals care about LAWS, RULES, or POLICIES?
Look at those news compilations people throw together from time to time. They're all repeating the same words no matter what station you tune in to. Eventually you can sync them all up as one voice.
Basically most international news, especially hot items like this, will get picked up by Reuters and/or AP and then yahoo, nyts, etc. all pick it up from there and might change the wording a bit... but its not as complicated to control the media when they all pull from the same source and you own both.
What does this mean? It means if we want to reduce the frequency and totsl victims of mass shootings, more of us should carry and be ready to interrupt such incidents. I respect the owner(s) of the property who acknowledge that state laws allowing citizens to carry supercede property rules! That Greenwood hero should be honored!
Well, in 22 instances the 'good guy with a gun' method worked. Maybe if more people bought guns and got trained and personal carried, we could improve on that number.
Mockingbird gonna mock. Basically saying " Stay out of the way of our terrorism / fear agenda, Accept death, & T2A is useless" .
Point is that armed citizens do save people, and themselves. They also fail to mention how often does an armed citizen add to the carnage. Almost never.
So what's the problem ? The " good guy w/ a gun " stories emboldens the people and destroys their " guns are Bad " narratives.
Damn people are stupid. Banning guns on property does not protect ANYONE. Since when do these idiots think that criminals care about LAWS, RULES, or POLICIES?
It's coordinated "news" designed to discourage good Samaritans and to embolden the anti-gun crowd.... who will repeat this "factoid" from now on.
It's true. There's a minimum body count for it to be a mass shooting, if it gets stopped right away it's not a mass shooting.
You answered it in your headline question:
It's definitely lockstep.
Look at those news compilations people throw together from time to time. They're all repeating the same words no matter what station you tune in to. Eventually you can sync them all up as one voice.
NEOBBA (Not Either/Or But Both And.....)
Q answered your question. It is lockstep; 4AM talking points that are handed out to the MSM.
https://qalerts.app/?q=4am
Of course it's 4"33". The Masonic number. These people are freaks.
Editing: looked up Q post 433, "Trust Wray".🤔🤨😯
Basically most international news, especially hot items like this, will get picked up by Reuters and/or AP and then yahoo, nyts, etc. all pick it up from there and might change the wording a bit... but its not as complicated to control the media when they all pull from the same source and you own both.
regardless, NCSWIC!!!
What does this mean? It means if we want to reduce the frequency and totsl victims of mass shootings, more of us should carry and be ready to interrupt such incidents. I respect the owner(s) of the property who acknowledge that state laws allowing citizens to carry supercede property rules! That Greenwood hero should be honored!
Reuters or Associated Press (AP) write the news. Everyone else copy pastes the news.
Rare because we need more constitutional carry states.
Sounds like we need more armed bystanders. So is that what they are suggesting ?
Well, in 22 instances the 'good guy with a gun' method worked. Maybe if more people bought guns and got trained and personal carried, we could improve on that number.