The myocarditis death rate is 80,000% to 220,000% higher than covid
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
That's not the right way to say that.
The odds of getting myocarditis from the vaxx are not 100%. You have to take the chance to get myocarditis from the vaxx, then multiply that by the chance of death. Then you can compare the two numbers.
I completely agree with you Slyver, the post (title and image) is terribly misleading, but it's technically correct.
The comparison being made is not between between the coof and 'your chance of dying from myocarditis if you take the vaxx'.
The comparison is simply between the coof (as one disease) and vaxx-induced myocarditis (as another).
Because of how it is worded, there is no need to stack the percentages.
Is it misleading? Yes (due to our own assumptions).
Is it wrong? No.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see where the meme explicitly offers the choice of 'whether or not to take the shot'. I think that's what we assume the meme is trying to say, based on the two discrete diseases that are being compared.
Again, as I said to Slyver, this meme is very misleading, in that it is either 'grammatically poor' or 'intentionally deceptive'.
u/ProudOfAmerica and u/Slyver are both smarter than me.
I just wanted to add that the chance of getting dozens of other vaxx side effects is also in play here. Reoccurring cancers, skin disorders, and all kinds of other life threatening, life changing adverse reactions are also on the table for those who took the vaxx and boooostas.
When you add all of those up, there is a nearly 100% chance that people who took the vaxx, and especially boooostas, are fooked now or later.
And then you die?
Dr Evils new nickname shall be Fauci.
Can we get a meme of dr evil with fauci's face overlaid and a hairless cat please?
u/#catdance
Indeed, Slyver. And we just don't have good data yet on the % of people that the jab causes myocarditis in. We know it's a substantial number, but we don't know what that number is yet.