Ok I’ll say it…
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (120)
sorted by:
Do we even know for a fact that there were real victims in Sandy Hook? The ferocity with which they have gone after Alex Jones for saying there wasn't only makes me doubt them more.
It's a fair question. I followed the event closely in 2013. You probably can't find 95% of all the info today that flowed back then. The purge on YouTube, Reddit, ATS, GLP, etc. was absolute and irreversible. Anybody who even casually brought up the subject found their comments and content insta-banned for several years after AJ made his infamous comments.
But in a nutshell, I could never arrive at a definite conclusion other than I believed Adam Lanza was a completely fabricated individual. A researcher went around knocking on neighbor's doors a few days after the event and one of the neighbors, across the street and over one house, who had lived there for many years stated quite quizzically that he didn't realize Nancy had two sons, only knowing of her son Ryan who lived in NYC at the time. That to me was one of the most interesting little factoids. The handful of photographs and yearbook pictures that popped up later were all questionable at best. The stories of Nancy and Adam frequently going to the shooting range together were also summarily dispelled when several researchers interviewed owners of all the gun ranges within 100 miles and none had ever heard of nor seen either of them at their range.
If you think about it, it's in many cases an IMPOSSIBLE TASK to disprove something that was never satisfactorily and undeniably proven. Which is precisely what one would need to do when making a counter claim like "nobody died at SH". "He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". I could say "the moon is made of blue cheese". If you then counter-claimed "the moon is not made of blue cheese", then it's now on you to prove me wrong --- which you could never do.
How does one go about proving this claim (nobody died)? If it was all a fabricated crisis event as many claim, you can be assured that none of the participants (parents, teachers, LEO, coroner, etc.) are going to help you prove your claim. You wouldn't have one chance in a million to convince a jury with all the mountains of circumstantial evidence you presented. One angry and weeping mother would neutralize all of it in a hot minute in front of a blue-pilled jury.
Never before or since have I seen a news segment like the 60-minutes piece on "What the media got wrong about Sandy Hook" solely dedicated to damage control over an event. And this was precisely the reason that all the "conspiracy theorists" jumped into the fray to begin with. The media literally got more wrong than they did right about it. A recipe for massive controversy.
What few on this board yet seem to realize even now, is that there are large groups of disinformation, misinformation, cointelpro and "conspiracy propagandists" that generate massive amounts of content to further muddy the waters of the legitimate conspiracy researchers. I've never seen more of this nor in greater quantities than around the events at SH.
If somebody wanted to really prove this once and for all, they would need to prove two or more of these children never existed and/or never died. At least one researcher back in the day took this tack and was compiling an interesting body of information on two of the kids, but was never able to get far enough to make an irrefutable case.
To say the events surrounding SH were beyond sketchy and suspicious would be the understatement of the decade. On other hand, to make the claim that "nobody died" would require someone to compile several data points of irrefutable evidence without the help of anybody "officially" involved, all the while having to defend against a systemic group of powerful players that could and would counter your claim in an instant with fake pictures, videos, official documents, etc. at a moments notice. e.g. - the claim that certain kids didn't have locatable birth or death certificates in the vital records systems. These could be easily generated and a "privacy" excuse could be passed off quite easily for example.
Net-Net - Without really two or more high-level insiders getting involved and demonstrating multiple instances of deliberate and provable fraud, it would be an impossible task to prove such a claim. Thus, all I can say with certainty today is that whatever happened that day, it is undoubtedly not what we were told!
Great post my friend! I wish I could give you about 100 more upvotes, you certainly deserve it for your hard work on that. Clear, concise and chock full of information. That was very helpful to me, I was not really paying a lot of attention at the time of Sandy Hook, had a lot of other stuff going on in my life, so I missed a lot of the undercurrents and weirdness popping up in synchronicity with the concurrent mockingbird narrative.
It seems like especially with these false flag deals that being in early is the best way to catch all of the oddball happenings that discredit the purported reality of the event. For example I remember right after Floyd there was stuff surfacing about him and NBA player Steven Jackson, Illuminati symbols as tattoos, medical autopsy folks discussing the severity of the trauma itself and how impossible it would be to suffocate from the pressure of the knee alone, etc.
One really compelling piece I saw showed the strange uniforms of the police and the EMT first responders. A lady who'd worked for Minneapolis hospitals her whole career said they were way off, completely different and they had some odd patches on them too if I remember correct. The vehicles were all wrong too.
If you zoom further out in your thinking, you start to be shocked by the sheer number of cameras they had positioned around that location - where Chauvin just happened to pull the car onto the sidewalk and then decide to bring him over to the opposite side of the car( nearest to the road where someone could accidentally run into them) allowing the camera to catch it all - not to mention the "viral video" made by a magical disappearing minor (who of course for legal reasons can't be named or any info). How about Floyd's rap career from his days in Houston, or the club that he and Chauvin both worked at that closed immediately after it got into the news? Once you start to know what to look for, it DOES get easier to figure out the tricks of their trade.
So much of the potential to identify it and bring it to the light (or at least slow it down by calling attention to the oddball parts of the event and force them to bury the story before its maximum impact is achieved) is those critical first hours and days, I think, when they haven't successfully tucked all the fuck ups in yet.
If you get there before they do it really can shut the whole program down entirely and while full exposure is probably next to impossible, minimizing the impact of a false flag is the most important thing in the end.
Normies won't believe they set it all up and shot it like a movie anyways, but if you can bring enough out in the early hours and days to get people talking about how weird it seems instead of how bad it was or why they're angry about it, that is a huge win because it neutralizes all the emotions they need to foster with it to begin with. When things don't make sense logically it's a HUGE tell if you've got a fake on your hands or not, in my opinion... this is why the Lamestream media is obsessed with getting us to the "acceptance" phase of all things that are illogical and or morally backwards. Repetitions and endless phrase drops until we forget you are supposed to wrestle with things that don't make sense to find what and why is behind it and not just shake your head and say Wow. It's another way of saying that quote about Good Men doing Nothing but I digress, lets keep on topic.
I think Uvalde is a PERFECT example of what I just described. Not only was the entire event botched to what seemed like a GREAT DEGREE on their end, but us Anons were already in gear from earlier events and were getting the timeline and all the fuckery out to the wider world almost as fast as it was happening! What's resulted has been a HUGE BLOWBACK for their side where they were caught with their pants down, and so many eyes (normies not just us) were on it simultaneously that they were unable to bury the story early and abort the mission, as we sometimes see during a false flag. It went so bad and they were so exposed that they had fake outrage and conduct a bullshit full investigation, resulting in the MSM giving us one of the most wild bullshit lies I've ever heard, that you literally would HAVE TO BE AN ASSHOLE TO BELIEVE. I mean if you seriously think 100 goddamn cops sat outside of a classroom where it would be impossible not to hear children and adults screaming while a young kid (who from photos looked like he could lose a fight with 3 8 year olds) blew them away with a pee shooter for over an hour. I mean I've got a bridge in Brooklyn for sale right now just tell me if you think that was true! I mean come on no one was in those fucking rooms.
What solidifies Uvalde as a win, however, is not just the ridiculous narrative they were forced into selling or the sham investigation that went nowhere. It was how they had to spin the arrow and point the narrative THE EXACT WRONG WAY. It makes me laugh every time!
Instead of demonizing the AR-15 and getting Matthew McConaughey to appear and have a national kumbaya with us at the boy scout campfire, before announcing his entrance into politics and a 2024 presidential run (Why not? They use what they have)
Instead they have cops looking like heartless pricks and/or incompetent to the point of retardation becoming a legitimately questionable reasoning for the why.
(The following is a loose stream of consciousness style attempt at recreating the conversations by the baddies during the Uvalde debacle. Viewer discretion is advised)
What the fuck, guys!? What to do we use, defund?
Thanks for allowing me this indulgence. It was cathartic if nothing else, to imagine these smug assfaces run around like fools trying to salvage the crazy train known as Uvalde. As a last minute addition I just would ask the question to all: How often do you hear of the school getting demolished so fast as this one following an incident like this? From a districting perspective where do all the surviving children go to school now? LOL silly deep state. How about that funeral home next door they used for every single child! Glad they had all their life insurance and plots set up for their 7 year olds! Uvalde people are really a very prepared bunch, you've got to tip your hat. That was is almost as good as those "mobile cremation units" in Ukraine! Oh my god guys kids died in there! Why wont you believe us? We took care of the bodies already they deserved that out of uh, respect, yeah that's it! WHY WONT YOU BELIEVEEEE MEEEE REEEEE
Godspeed.
Hahaha, you're right over the target with all of your analysis!! The closer the information, interview, video, audio, etc. is to the time of the event, the more accurate it generally is. The Sandy Hook event is just like the Floyd and Uvalde events. Same goes for 9/11, Boston Marathon FF, etc. etc. Look to those real-time interviews, videos, etc., which tend to get scrubbed and disappeared more than any others.
As you rightly point out in your comment, they can't get away with their shenanigans today like they used to. Way too many people are now awake to it and there are perhaps millions of minds now focused on their forkery, as opposed to perhaps a few thousand 20+ years ago.
The world is waking up, one mind at a time, but many minds per day now. It won't be long.....
The prevalence of both cell phones and surveillance cameras makes it VERY difficult to pull these things off the way they used to.
I absolutely agree with your word wall! Asking questions always gets the ball rolling but the invention of the tv is to bypass critical thinking by showing images thereby proving that what you see is the truth when in fact it’s the opposite. Oh and, how dare you?
Thank you so much , I too missed a lot due to major events in my life and have been trying to catch up ,, all I did know believe ,, is DS was involved!
No thank you sir, I appreciate all of your kind comments, thank you for taking time on reading what I have been putting out. It's a very needed ego boost at this juncture in my life to hear you and others compliment my work. Flattery will get you everywhere! ;) I know exactly how life can take you away from being on top of this stuff. The truth is that I have also been too far removed from that pace of life myself and it's been nice to have the time necessary to catch up in the past couple years, off and on.
It does take time and energy to learn this stuff and keep going and adding to your 'mind palace' as you do. The world happens so fast lately and the time commitment needed to really focus in and then to actually post a long thought out idea is that much more. I am blessed with some natural skill at writing that makes part of the process easier and more fun to me than other spots, ultimately I am thankful for that gift from God because it let's me retain at least a little of my active brain to stay in the real world doing what is necessary to keep afloat. We all feel like we are teetering lately it seems like, I don't even know a person who hasn't had significant consequences from the economy.
I just want to once more thank you! I am excited to continue the fight and bring new ideas and messages to you and others thru my writing. I really hope it helps 😁😁
Godspeed,
Dom
That much is true of every single event as covered by the mainstream media.
I believe they use kids or "kids" of very young school age as the victim because they would not have a long verifiable history to research. If they use high-school kids they need to fabricate 8-12 yrs of school pics, teacher stories, youth sport pics, etc.
That's a legit theory.
Yeah, it's really difficult to make claims and the suppression of anyone questioning it is sketchy. It smells like a lot of things they do. It actually smelled like how they came down on people who called out the mask bullshit.
But yeah basically impossible or at least non feasible to prove a negative, and that is even more true years later. It seems to me that Alex has focused a bit too singularly and vehemently about it, which tracks with the assumption that he's a clown. The louder he is, the more he detracts from it in the public eye.
Reverse is also true of course in that he attracts a certain kind of person as well. I watched Info Wars a few times as my background noise. But now I tend to lend my ear towards more moderate, less loud positions.
I actually appreciate a lot of our MAGA moderates more than I used to. There is a place for the hardcore MAGA types, and a place for the moderate types.
Yep, agreed. AJ has to generate 15 hours of "conspiracy theory" content every week. That's an impossible job to do unless you effectively talk about EVERYTHING that's out there, knowing full well a ton of it is disinfo. Thus is the trap he's fallen into millions of times.
I'm still on the fence with this farce of a "trial". It played more like a "Judge Judy" episode with literally zero adherence to anything ever remotely resembling a real case. The LEGAL profession should be ashamed of itself and embarrassed beyond comprehension!
My bet is, this trial was "part of the show" for reasons I cannot yet fathom but will likely become clear in the near future. We shall see....
Hi @Morpheus11, I was not awake when Sandy Hook happened. Would you know of any decent videos on it on brighteon, bitchute or rumble, etc?
95% are long gone, all the good, focused on a specific topic at least. You can still find a few floating around. Just search "Sandy Hook" on Bitchute - most of the longer, larger videos are right there within the first 10-20 results.
Here are a few good ones that point out all the SH fuckery (cc: @Morpheus11 )
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aP1sQ50cBo82 (Revisiting Sandy Hook Documentary)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ML0CXjJWi1Tu (We need to talk about Sandy Hook)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KPxRxkIGtHpo (Sandy Hook fuckery pointed out)
https://stoplookthink.com/wolfgang-halbig-has-stunning-evidence-that-sandy-hook-elementary-school-was-closed-months-before-massacre (Evidence that Sandy Hook was closed months before the massacre)
Things that make you go hmmm.
No, only the media and government narrative.
I think with how fishy some of the stuff turned out to be, questioning it is good.
But perhaps don't make a target of the families. That's what makes Alex Jones have to pay money, as bullshit as that is.
Asking questions about incidents is never bad. When things stink, they stink. And some things make that whole thing stink.
I'm just saying though that it can be a false flag whether there are victims or not is all.
That school wasn’t even being used at the time.
Where did you hear that? I’m from Ct and never heard that.
I’ll have to look for some evidence articles I have. They changed their WiFi to a school down the road like 7 months before. There’s all kinds of shady facts on that event. Drone or helicopter footage shows the same people doing loops in and out of the upper quadrant building just to make it look like a lot of different people were on the scene. Mortgages on houses were paid off in an area around the school (pay offs), and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. I’m sure lots of anons could fill in all kinds of extra stuff I’m not remembering at the moment.