(That's a chance I'm willing to take,) I posted this as a joke , but it brought out plenty of virtue signaling fags, lol. What thin skin they have. Reddit much? ๐คฃ
Mob justice has been wrong many times in the past, and there is a reason why we have learned that such capital punishment requires proof beyond a shadow of a doubt.
People have been executed or died in prison for raping or murdering someone before the advent of DNA testing, and were later found innocent..after their lives had already ended.
The person above suggested that it doesn't matter if he's innocent, it's "worth the risk", because to him even being accused of abusing children is enough to be murdered.
It is not thinking rationally, logically or morally.
It is different if it's, say, a dad who caught the act on person and kills the guy over it.
But execution by the people is supposed to come with proof that they were guilty of it. You can not just accuse someone of something and then kill them for it.
Additionally, and from another important point of view, by murdering someone who is innocent based on accusation alone, you are potentially depriving the victim of their justice. You are potentially allowing the person who actually committed the crime to walk free. That is also immoral.
Maybe you should do something to fix the legal system so that the right guy gets caught and then charged and then convicted if hes found guilty. How would you like to go to one of these parts of the world on a vacation and then somebody just randomly accuses you of stealing frof stealing from them and you didn't even do shit you're just walking through the fucking street and then suddenly a whole fucking crowd of people is beating you to death with like 2 by force and shit?
Issue with Mob Justice. Sometimes the Mob kills the wrong person.
They knew who did it.
If no more kids get raped and die they got the right guy.
(That's a chance I'm willing to take,) I posted this as a joke , but it brought out plenty of virtue signaling fags, lol. What thin skin they have. Reddit much? ๐คฃ
Your morality is trash then, and killing an innocent person will send you straight to hell and remove any virtuousness you believe you have.
How do you know he's innocent???
I didn't say he's innocent. Learn to read.
Mob justice has been wrong many times in the past, and there is a reason why we have learned that such capital punishment requires proof beyond a shadow of a doubt.
People have been executed or died in prison for raping or murdering someone before the advent of DNA testing, and were later found innocent..after their lives had already ended.
The person above suggested that it doesn't matter if he's innocent, it's "worth the risk", because to him even being accused of abusing children is enough to be murdered.
It is not thinking rationally, logically or morally.
It is different if it's, say, a dad who caught the act on person and kills the guy over it.
But execution by the people is supposed to come with proof that they were guilty of it. You can not just accuse someone of something and then kill them for it.
Additionally, and from another important point of view, by murdering someone who is innocent based on accusation alone, you are potentially depriving the victim of their justice. You are potentially allowing the person who actually committed the crime to walk free. That is also immoral.
Maybe you should do something to fix the legal system so that the right guy gets caught and then charged and then convicted if hes found guilty. How would you like to go to one of these parts of the world on a vacation and then somebody just randomly accuses you of stealing frof stealing from them and you didn't even do shit you're just walking through the fucking street and then suddenly a whole fucking crowd of people is beating you to death with like 2 by force and shit?
See, now you're retarded.
Someone isn't a pedophile just because you call them a pedophile.
If you kill one single innocent person, you deserve to be gunned down like filth.
https://qalerts.app/?q=rule+of+law