I once read an article about Chinese censorship. They wanted to understand what China was censoring, and why. They discovered that in China, the government will allow the people to complain about almost any problem, BUT the minute someone suggests they actually DO SOMETHING about the problem, the government cracks down on them.
And i suspect the American government isn't a whole lot different. They will let you bitch and moan, but the moment you start discussing what you are going to do about it, they shut it down.
What your tyrannical owners fear most, is your DIRECT ACTION.
what is DIRECT ACTION?
Imagine you live in a small village, with only one well. Unfortunately, the man who owns the well is a tyrant. You can complain all day long about the tyrant who owns the well, but if you want water, you are going to pay the man whatever he wants.
OR,
you could get off your butt, and go dig yourself a new well.
The tyrant who owns the only well in town, fears nothing more, than you digging another well, and leveling the playing field.
THAT is what "Direct Action" means
THAT is what tyrants fear.
What kinds of DIRECT ACTIONS can we take?
We have talked about END THE FED, and END THE IRS, for many years, and i think everyone here reading this, is on board with it.
The IRS was created to collect income tax, for the federal reserve.
They were born together, and now they can die together.
Sixteenth Amendment
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on INCOMES, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-16/
First of all, the 16th amendment is a very important rabbit hole.
You would do well, to research some of the "conspiracy theories" about the 16th amendment, including the theory that the so-called amendment was never properly ratified by the required number of states.
We, The PEOPLE, could simply demand that we have another ratification vote, to clarify, and make sure that is what WE THE PEOPLE still want the US Congress to have the power to tax our incomes.
There is some theory also about there being 2 different 16th amendments, one that passed, and one that didn't pass. ill try to link source later.
We could start a populist moment, to amend and/or repeal the 16th amendment.
i propose the following:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on USURY, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
The 16th amendment is fundamentally unfair to the average American, who barely makes the median income, lives in a modest house, works an honest job, giving honest goods and services, on a voluntary basis.
if you LABOR FOR A LIVING,
then you should not be TAXED FOR LIVING.
Lets be very clear about where real WEALTH actually comes from,
and how real WEALTH is actually "redistributed".
ALL WEALTH IS DERIVED FROM LABOR.
~ Adam Smith, author of Wealth of Nations,
which is the Father of all Western Economics textbooks.
The Founding Fathers of USA, read Wealth of Nations, which was published in 1775,
And the incorporated many ideas from Wealth of Nations, into the US Constitution, and the Free Market Economy.
This book is so well-written, so readable, so logical, so influential,
That it is truly a masterpiece of literature,
And as such, it should be considered "required reading" for all Americans.
USURY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL.
What is USURY?
Usury is the paying of money, for the use of money.
Usury is frowned upon by "almost" every major religion.
Usury is called Riba in Arabic.
Usury is forbidden in Islam, which is why Islamic Banking is ostensibly "usury free"
Islamic Banking is a threat to the USURY CLASS
USURY IS THE MECHANISM BY WHICH WEALTH IS TRANSFERRED,
FROM THE RIGHTFUL OWNERS, WHICH ARE THE LABORERS WHO CREATE WEALTH,
TO THE USURY CLASS, THE BANKERS, THE MONEY CHANGERS, THE BABYLONIAN MONEY MAGICIANS.
USURY is INTEREST,
"Gold is money. Everything else is credit" ~ JP Morgan, Banker (Rothschild)
what that means is, since your "money" is not actually GOLD", it is merely credit.
thats right. the US Dollar is not an store of wealth, but an instrument of credit.
thats why your "DOLLAR" bills say NOTE on them.
We, The People, have a USURY BASED MONEY SUPPLY.
What can we do?
What Direct Actions can we take?
The Whole World Knows About Jesus Christ,
So lets start Operation What Would Jesus Do!
hashtag #OpWWJD #WWJD
http://twitter.com/search?q=OpWWJD+OR+WWJD
SO what DID Jesus do?
He Drove The USURERS OUT of the TEMPLE with a WHIP
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleansing_of_the_Temple
https://i.redd.it/0bjnz4nwnnz21.png
We Demand "Tax Relief"
Taxing usury will only result in credit being more expensive. I propose the states levy taxes which then to go the federal government as the founders intended. No more direct taxation by the feds. The US government as a whole is simply too big and far too powerful in the hands of unelected officials. No more taxation without representation. A great reset of the federal government in accordance with the constitution is what we need.
The debtor always pays the tax even In this scenario. They just raise the price of use.
We should not have to pay a tax for the right to work or the income produced by that work period.
Nobody should be printing money out of thin air and charging to circulate it then charging on the earnings.
Without us the elite who produce zero don't get to eat
We shouldn't be forced to pay a fee to access that money, either.
That too
Ostracize IRS employees. It's the only way. If they become social pariahs, that would make the cost of helping the beast too high.
Is there a list of IRS employees that's accessible?
A whip he made himself (three of the gospels don't mention that, but in John it says he made a whip out of cords).
Simply chasing them out of the temple would indicate he was pissed off, but how pissed off do you have to be to make the whip before chasing them out?
It should be against any human's nature to fund their own demise. It's bad enough if our stolen money is to provide a ridiculous luxury lifestyle to the 1%.
However it just so happens the 1% has also used our wealth to regularly commit Crimes Against Humanity, strengthen their armor, & tighten our chains.
This is much more than taxation w/out representation. It clearly looks like a survival situation to me. There is zero accountability and zero to show for the theft anyway.
Starve the beast = Smaller Beast.
Smaller beast = Bigger People.
Bigger People = Better Chance of Survival.
I've always said the best course of action would be to just stop consenting to being governed by the federal government. They're not supposed to have as much power as they do, according to the constitution. "Congress shall make no law..." does not apply to unelected federal agencies, who should not exist in the first place, including the DOJ.
At times like this, we, as a free people, must choose to enforce our rights and freedoms.
What that means is whatever it means to you.
There is no more 'Representation'..therefore, no taxation. Assfags aren't getting a dime from me.
The truth is we should not be taxed to be represented.
The saying implies we should be taxed at all. I'm not on board.
Let me put it real simple. I'm never paying a fucking cent to the IRS again. I know some of you don't have a choice but I sure as fuck do.
How?
By keeping my money. Customers pay me, not an employer.
"sent"? Is that the American simplified spelling of "cent" as used in Europe?
Voice to text sorry they down voted you thanks for the heads up
the Older Testament also forbids usury either when dealing with your countryman or with resident aliens:
https://tifwe.org/old-testament-loans-interest-part-1/ Exodus 22:25https://tifwe.org/resource/lending-and-interest-in-the-old-testament/
It also forbids differing weights (such as Federal Reserve Notes vs. Silver or Gold) and measures.
The Income Tax was signed into law by Abraham Lincoln in the Revenue Act of 1862. This predated the 16th Amendment by 51 years.
The Income Tax does not depend on the 16th Amendment. Take away the 16th Amendment and the Income Tax remains.
OP is right that it's time to dig but I believe the 16th Amendment is a red herring.
so it shouldn't really make a difference if we go ahead and repeal the 16th amendment
That's right. It won't make a difference. Repeal away.
edit: I'm not being a doomer. I believe there is an answer to the lncome Tax. I just think repealing the 16th will not be it.
And the bastards collateralized all our federal lands for the chinese loans. Starting with Clinton's, It seems as THOUGH THE UNITED STATES WAS THE FIRST BELTS AND ROADS INITIATiVE COUNTRY CHINA CAPTURED.
Pelosi and company, Clinton's, Obama all in china's pockets, bushes and the rest all euro elite controlled. Bush senior was that guy in man in the high tower. The country was split after ww2. They didn't don't through direct occupation like the show does. That's the trick. They infiltrated. Took over with white proxies allowing them power. Behind both of those sides same people. Different divisions of the same company driving competition between each other. Then feeding is a bullshit story.
We won ww2 in Europe, we lost it at home. The real war was on our soil and it started at the end of the one in Europe.
That’s one of the things that pisses me off the most. China shouldn’t own one square inch of American soil and it’s outrageous that they collaterilized this for their loans. That will all be reversed though, I’m sure of that.
NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!
Why does the United States of America have a seat at the UN and the United States does not?
Why are people who are naturalized under the laws of the United States admitted as citizens of the United States of America?
Why do passports state on the cover "United States of America" and not United States?
Why does the passport list nationality as "United States of America"?
Why does the form for renouncing nationality mention that it is for renouncing United States nationality? Is it possible to renounce something that one never had?
Why does the United States of America sign treaties with other countries, not the United States?
Where does the Internal Revenue code name the 50 states in the general definitions? (HINT: it doesn't)