So just a few short weeks ago there was talk and and panic about New York prepping for a nuclear fallout type of incident. Now with the narrative that President Trump had the nuclear codes or whatever, one must ponder the possibility that they are getting ready for their false flag event involving nuclear weapons...
I really hope I am over thinking this...
There are no drones the size and shape of a 767 and the passengers are dead and gone. The buildings came down as they did, no mystery about it. Those who think there is a mystery are laboring under ignorance of the relevant facts (like the fact that the burning temperature of jet fuel is about twice that at which structural steel loses all its strength).
I don’t think the comment on jet fuel burning temperature being twice the temperature of structural steel losing its strength is correct. Tenebre that this building was built to withstand a plane cashing into it.
You can look up steel strength for yourself. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/metal-temperature-strength-d_1353.html And jet fuel (kerosene) flame tempeature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_flame_temperature
Here one of many videos on the deception.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/clcE5rMvhmxC/
Which proves what? There is nothing remarkable about those clips. Of course the airplane would "sink" into the side of the building. What else could it do? Are the building walls going to go anywhere? It is interesting to see that the engines were stripped off and left at the face of the building, which is consistent with the fact that they had a lot of frontal area and not as much sectional density as the rest of the airplane.
The "raw video" and "newscast" images were not taken from the same line of sight. The airplane may have been out of image for the "raw video" clip, or too faint to be resolved. What deception? All you have is a desire to see something you think cannot be true, or cannot be explained.
Airplanes don't sink into a steel reinforced building. They usually splatter then fall down
Says the man who doesn't know what he is talking about. This happened before in 1945 when a B-25 bomber crashed into the 79th floor of the Empire State Building. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/the-b-25-empire-state-building-crash-tragedy-on-34th-street/ There is no "usually." When you have 179 tons of airliner hitting a building at 465 mph, the building will give way.
Thermite explosives we're planted by Mossad. The buildings were then brought down, floor by floor. If you haven't studied this or gone down this rabbit hole you have to spend hours to catch up.
This has happened to me each and every time I learn a new truth.
First, thermite is NOT an explosive. You are already mistaken about a key point. It is an incendiary agent. And what would be your evidence that any thermite was present, when everything about aluminum airplanes burning in a steel building would create the same combustion products?
Once the columns of a given floor buckle, in an environment of weakened steel strength, the floor will collapse instantly (the loads get shifted at the speed of sound, which is several thousand feet per second in steel), and there will be a pancake collapse of the entire column. Once it gets started, there is no stopping.
You will necessarily go down a rabbit hole---because you haven't learned about civil engineering. Mossad? You are filling your ignorance with prejudice.
So nothing to see here with the way the entire plane entered the buildings like a cartoon?
And you have feelings for Mossad? That's a first here. Have you not heard of the dancing Mossad agents caught red handed as the towers were coming down?
That is exactly what one could expect to see. The airplane had insuperable momentum and simply plunged into the building. Building wreckage would be carried inward with the airplane. You can see that the engines had been stripped off their struts and left at the outer wall. You have things all mixed up in your head. That's the way it happens. Show me a cartoon that does that. They all show an outward explosion, right?
What's with your obsession about the Mossad? Do you also believe monsters lurk in your closet?
Please educate yourself with New Pearl Harbor.
There may have been plots behind the scenes, in which case, who was there to witness anything? A dead trail.
The buildings came down in the only way that could be expected. The only arguments I have seen to the contrary are by people who are ignorant of combustion and steel construction.
You have no interest in passing along information. What is "New Pearl Harbor"? Obviously, it is something you cannot describe in a few sentences. I'm already educated, and I don't need to waste my time.