They have to destroy the evidence coming to light on the control group (non-vaxxed) verses the vaxxed. How better to do that than to reorganize the data to the point both groups have vaxxed people.
Now your control group data is contaminated making it easier to blur the statistics.
They really don't want us to know the size of the control group. They don't want us to know how many of us actually resisted their attempts at manipulation. I'm guessing 30 to 40 percent of the US population. Easily 100 million people. I'd guess most of the one-shot people were coerced and/or had a bad reaction, so they would all side with us also. We've probably got close to 50% of Americans coming down on our side of this right now, with more joining each day.
No, you're not the only one who has noticed. I think you know why - erasing the distinction between "unvaccinated" and "one vax shot" implies that there is a significant distinction in the first place.
They've done it that way since the beginning because they knew the highest # of side effects would occur in those first 14 days.
It's nearly impossible to find .gov funded studies where they don't lump those groups. I think both Scotland and Canada had it broken out for a few months till they realized how obviously bad it looked.
I've always read that problems (other than an immediate anaphylactic reaction while in your 15 mins waiting period) occur after the second shot (because it's usually within the 30 days, and doubles your jab load while initial load is still in there).
They have to destroy the evidence coming to light on the control group (non-vaxxed) verses the vaxxed. How better to do that than to reorganize the data to the point both groups have vaxxed people.
Now your control group data is contaminated making it easier to blur the statistics.
They really don't want us to know the size of the control group. They don't want us to know how many of us actually resisted their attempts at manipulation. I'm guessing 30 to 40 percent of the US population. Easily 100 million people. I'd guess most of the one-shot people were coerced and/or had a bad reaction, so they would all side with us also. We've probably got close to 50% of Americans coming down on our side of this right now, with more joining each day.
i've heard 73million with no shot whatsoever. you are right on stopped at one or two
No, you're not the only one who has noticed. I think you know why - erasing the distinction between "unvaccinated" and "one vax shot" implies that there is a significant distinction in the first place.
They've done it that way since the beginning because they knew the highest # of side effects would occur in those first 14 days.
It's nearly impossible to find .gov funded studies where they don't lump those groups. I think both Scotland and Canada had it broken out for a few months till they realized how obviously bad it looked.
I've always read that problems (other than an immediate anaphylactic reaction while in your 15 mins waiting period) occur after the second shot (because it's usually within the 30 days, and doubles your jab load while initial load is still in there).
They need more deaths in the unvaccinated column to justify the vaccine.