He got all squirrely on me, started making up obviously bullshit explanations for something he was probably unaware of, or at least unprepared to discuss.
He had a crew of “architects and engineers” on the thread, backing up his bullshit explanations.
I destroyed his dumbass with a handful of questions he couldnt answer, so what did he do?
He tried to back out of the AMA, and claim it was “someone else” impersonating him.
The AMA was heavily advertised on reddit for weeks before it happened, so everyone was expecting it.
Then “top minds of reddit” jumped on the bandwagon, and claimed we all got fooled by an imposter.
I thought Richard Gage was a legit guy, until he showed his hand.
Beyond your pretty story, what issue is it you have with him? He, his organization, and its members have been relentless and were the major factor in getting a study done that Disproves the official narrative.
He’s a bullshitter. Instead of admitting, “gee, i don’t know”… he tried to wing it. And his explanations reeked of desperation to preserve his own pet narratives
Architects and Engineers is controlled Opp. There were no planes that hit the world trade center that day (I know it's very hard to believe, but unfortunately true) and yet their logo is literally a plane and the WTC.
Those buildings were rigged for controlled demolition, perhaps with something of even higher power than conventional explosions in the foundation to melt the evidence.
Talk to the thousands of people who watched the 2nd jet hit the south tower that day, including many of my co-workers in NJ who were directly across from the twin towers, and watched the 2nd jet come down the Hudson, do a u-turn, and slam into the south tower. Trying to promote the ridiculous notion that jets didn't hit the towers is pretty pitiful.
I was in lower Manhattan that day. I had co-workers who, along with THOUSANDS, watched the 2nd jet fly down the Hudson, do a U-turn, and fly back into the south tower. Why is this so hard for you to accept?
we've had this conversation before. the planes were CGI, it is not possible for even a military-trained pilot to aim a 747 going 500mph at the center of a building. Quarter inch thick aluminum would've crumpled against the steel I-beams. There are dozens of people running up to the fake news media claiming it was a plane where they said "no I saw it it was a bomb not a plane".
There is documentary called 9/11 the great american psy-opera that goes over how the CGI was done in extreme detail.
It is physically impossible for an aluminum can to cut through steel I-beams, especially out on the wing-tips, completely absurd.
The cell phone calls were also completely impossible given the altitude and speed
You apparently don't understand that CGI is something done on a computer, not out in the open air where people are standing and watching something. Perhaps you think they installed a giant hologram screen across the Hudson River to make it appear jets were flying by :) I question the official narrative on what happened on 9/11, but resorting to ridiculous means to explain what happened, is well, ridiculous.
video compositing. watch #7 THE KEY by AceBaker.
A lot of people didnt agree with him or called hi this that & the other but theres some excellent stuff in that episode, especially pertaining to the cameraman of chopper 5 on the morning of 911 and his specialty, which is none other than video compositing [i.e. how to insert a plane into a video clip]
https://www.pmjmp.org/post/9-11-the-great-american-psy-opera
Many witnesses including family saw the planes hit, from close up. It was controlled demolition afterward. CIA working w Mossad, with approval from Bush. It was all pretext for going to war in Iraq.
There were videos taken near building 7 of men in military garb with foreign accents saying “Nothing to see here” to a camera person and others saying “we’re gonna pull it”… implying a controlled demo.
Climate change is cyclical. It is real, but they lie that it’s caused by people, when it is mostly caused by the earth spinning in orbit and gravitational forces. Hot cold hot cold hot cold. Look up ice age or mini ice age, the earth was covered in snow many times. We can’t fathom such a concept of hundreds of thousands of years on our limited short-lived time scale.
Depends on how the towers footers were constructed. Sometimes they drill down to bedrock, sometimes they just drive pilings into loose soil to a certain depth to stabilize the footings. I do not know how it was done, but if pilings, they may have just excavated down below them during the cleanup.
But this photo does look really weird. No scrap/chisel or blast marks. This looks washed and formed by lava or water erosion. I've never seen this picture before.
Fuck Richard Gage.
That guy did a reddit AMA and i asked him about this “pot hole”
https://i.redd.it/nvddn9l5fwbz.jpg
He got all squirrely on me, started making up obviously bullshit explanations for something he was probably unaware of, or at least unprepared to discuss.
He had a crew of “architects and engineers” on the thread, backing up his bullshit explanations.
I destroyed his dumbass with a handful of questions he couldnt answer, so what did he do?
He tried to back out of the AMA, and claim it was “someone else” impersonating him.
The AMA was heavily advertised on reddit for weeks before it happened, so everyone was expecting it.
Then “top minds of reddit” jumped on the bandwagon, and claimed we all got fooled by an imposter.
I thought Richard Gage was a legit guy, until he showed his hand.
Hes controlled opposition.
And i destroyed his facade, on accident.
So sez you. I’m not so sure
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracyhub/comments/2qwmax/looks_like_r911truth_was_trolled_with_a_fake/
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/final-report-issued-by-university-of-alaska-fairbanks-wtc7-not-destroyed-by-fire-on-9-11/
Beyond your pretty story, what issue is it you have with him? He, his organization, and its members have been relentless and were the major factor in getting a study done that Disproves the official narrative.
He’s a bullshitter. Instead of admitting, “gee, i don’t know”… he tried to wing it. And his explanations reeked of desperation to preserve his own pet narratives
Architects and Engineers is controlled Opp. There were no planes that hit the world trade center that day (I know it's very hard to believe, but unfortunately true) and yet their logo is literally a plane and the WTC.
Those buildings were rigged for controlled demolition, perhaps with something of even higher power than conventional explosions in the foundation to melt the evidence.
correct.
you have to being with the presumption of a pre-planned controlled demolition,
and everything else is just hollywood theatrics and special effects.
Harley Shirt Guy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8ZYyF8SXMo
Talk to the thousands of people who watched the 2nd jet hit the south tower that day, including many of my co-workers in NJ who were directly across from the twin towers, and watched the 2nd jet come down the Hudson, do a u-turn, and slam into the south tower. Trying to promote the ridiculous notion that jets didn't hit the towers is pretty pitiful.
I think you might be suffering from false memory syndrome.
There were no planes.
There were no passengers.
There were no frantic phone calls to loved ones.
There were no heros who said “LETS ROLL”
Basically, 9/11 was a HOAX,
Just like Sandy Hook, and Boston Marathon, and the countless other fake news hoaxes.
After the War of the Worlds radio broadcast, the Chicago Tribune said,
“a lot of people are mentally retarded, and so a lot of content is created for their consumption”
I was in lower Manhattan that day. I had co-workers who, along with THOUSANDS, watched the 2nd jet fly down the Hudson, do a U-turn, and fly back into the south tower. Why is this so hard for you to accept?
we've had this conversation before. the planes were CGI, it is not possible for even a military-trained pilot to aim a 747 going 500mph at the center of a building. Quarter inch thick aluminum would've crumpled against the steel I-beams. There are dozens of people running up to the fake news media claiming it was a plane where they said "no I saw it it was a bomb not a plane".
There is documentary called 9/11 the great american psy-opera that goes over how the CGI was done in extreme detail.
It is physically impossible for an aluminum can to cut through steel I-beams, especially out on the wing-tips, completely absurd.
The cell phone calls were also completely impossible given the altitude and speed
You're allowed to believe what you want.
You apparently don't understand that CGI is something done on a computer, not out in the open air where people are standing and watching something. Perhaps you think they installed a giant hologram screen across the Hudson River to make it appear jets were flying by :) I question the official narrative on what happened on 9/11, but resorting to ridiculous means to explain what happened, is well, ridiculous.
How do you explain the video footage and eye-witness accounts?
Eye-witness account that they planted and broadcasted?
video compositing. watch #7 THE KEY by AceBaker. A lot of people didnt agree with him or called hi this that & the other but theres some excellent stuff in that episode, especially pertaining to the cameraman of chopper 5 on the morning of 911 and his specialty, which is none other than video compositing [i.e. how to insert a plane into a video clip] https://www.pmjmp.org/post/9-11-the-great-american-psy-opera
I think the planes did hit… but it was just a horrific distraction for the demolition.
Many witnesses including family saw the planes hit, from close up. It was controlled demolition afterward. CIA working w Mossad, with approval from Bush. It was all pretext for going to war in Iraq.
There were videos taken near building 7 of men in military garb with foreign accents saying “Nothing to see here” to a camera person and others saying “we’re gonna pull it”… implying a controlled demo.
Climate change is cyclical. It is real, but they lie that it’s caused by people, when it is mostly caused by the earth spinning in orbit and gravitational forces. Hot cold hot cold hot cold. Look up ice age or mini ice age, the earth was covered in snow many times. We can’t fathom such a concept of hundreds of thousands of years on our limited short-lived time scale.
What is the significance of this "pot hole"?
The significance is that it would be impossible to build a building on such an irregular surface.
Note that there is no evidence of any kind of foundation or footings that would have been there since the building was built.
They just kind of “melted” into this big blob of rock.
Which, along with “9/11 toasted cars”, strongly suggests that there was some sort of nuclear explosion, or DEW or something.
Jet fuel cant melt bedrock
Depends on how the towers footers were constructed. Sometimes they drill down to bedrock, sometimes they just drive pilings into loose soil to a certain depth to stabilize the footings. I do not know how it was done, but if pilings, they may have just excavated down below them during the cleanup.
But this photo does look really weird. No scrap/chisel or blast marks. This looks washed and formed by lava or water erosion. I've never seen this picture before.
It was formed by water erosion; frozen water. The bedrock beneath NYC was scoured by the ice sheet as it flowed SE during the last glacial epoch.
who is richard gage was he supposed to be a truther?