I suggest everyone read this EO in full. This is what the globalists want for us. You will see international influences mixed into the text of this EO. This is the next phase of the UN great reset. They want full control of all digital currency, monitoring and regulating it. Why do you think Biden hired 87,000 new IRS agents?
On March 9 2022 Biden signed EO 14067 called "Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets" and supposedly it will go into effect in December.
This plan primarily focuses on Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) however it does mention current digital assets. This should be a big wake up call to all the people investing in crypto. This EO is filled with language that will monitor and regulate your use of crypto currencies. They are telling you they have the ability to control your crypto whether you want to admit it or not. They would not be talking about this if it were impossible to facilitate.
They claim regulatory control of digital currencies will help combat terrorism. The DOJ has already told you how they think white supremacy (MAGA) is the greatest threat to our country.
You also see that the push for this EO is somehow related to climate change and protecting the environment. Such nonsense.
Now, we have to assume this EO will never be implemented and this is just another attempt to show people the truth. (Democrats are in bed with the globalists and China) This EO was thrown out there to wake up the sheeple
Truthfully, this EO will be dead after the midterms. This is why the start date is in December.
Executive orders: Swift, powerful, and easily reversed
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2021/0128/Executive-orders-Swift-powerful-and-easily-reversed
Once we take control of both houses, this EO will be revoked and shut down along with the Biden fake presidency. Election fraud evidence is coming in hard.
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
"Once we take control of both houses, this EO will be revoked and shut down..."
I don't think the Legislative Branch (House and Senate) has the power to dispose of an EO by the Executive Branch. But I'm educable, if you know otherwise.
An EO is always subservient to statutory law and the Constitution. Under Article 1, Section 8 that assigns to Congress the power “to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures.”, not the President.
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256. Since an unconstitutional law is void [so is an executive order void], the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law [or executive order] and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Thank you, voice of reason. I knew there was a Constitutional answer in there.
He is wrong. An EO is NOT lower in priority than a statute.
The hierarchy is this:
Constitution > Treaties / Statutes (federal) [in a conflict between these two, last in time prevails] > EO > State law
As you can see, federal statutes preempt conflicting EO's. That doesn't mean a conflicting EO is unconstitutional though, it just gets preempted and not enforced. For example, a state could pass a law that regulates the mining of a natural resource in that state. But if Congress passes a law that later regulates the same subject matter, the state law is preempted. On another note, there is something called implied preemption, or cover the field preemption that prevents a state from regulating something that is exclusively regulated by the federal government, like immigration.
The other guy should not be lecturing on law when he isn't a lawyer. I am. Youtube and Google are not law degrees.
I am thinking 10th amendment might argue your point. Federal powers are few and have enumerated powers , Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. I thinking you may forget from whom the federal government was created? The states created the federal government. The created (Fed), is subservient to the creator (states). Are you stating the creation, rules over the creator? O.o?
If election fraud is fully exposed by then, then SCOTUS and/or the military would be reversing not just the EO, but all actions done by the Biden regime since assuming office.
It is the job of neither the SCOTUS nor the military to do that reversal.
If Obama wasn't born in the USA, nothing he signed would have validity, either.
Maybe passing legislation to stop the EO? Other than that I don't know. Suing?
You may be right. I just know that the three branches of government are independent and don't control each other.
If only the right side had a "Hawaiian judge" to roll out to stop EOs.
EO’s can only highlight the enforcement of existing laws. They cannot create law, unless you’re a democrat.
This is not true. Lots of misinformation here guys, be careful.
I don’t see how. The executive branch cannot make law only enforce law.
It's pretty basic, actually. Happens all the time.
And I don't know why you are convinced of the point you're trying to make. It's simply not true. I'm literally an attorney lol
Of course knowing this is an illegitimately installed regime makes this "E.O." null & void.