I mean, the police really have no legitinate use for guns, 99.99% of the time, and that 00.01% of the time they need a gun isnt a good enough reason to carry one.
I can play that, too. Any time I see an armed cop, anywhere in New York, doing anything, I will assume he is going to perform something unlawful and react appropriately if he makes any threatening gestures.
Fortunately, I don't live in New York. Unfortunately, I don't trust them anywhere else much differently.
Never should they ever. Especially considering these people operate under being innocent and only bring proven innocent
This is why you never trust pigs, active or retired.
So, this means the police will be disarmed right?
I mean, the police really have no legitinate use for guns, 99.99% of the time, and that 00.01% of the time they need a gun isnt a good enough reason to carry one.
I believe this is a case where I say see the 2nd ammendment and sue
Police are trained from the start to assume everyone they encounter is guilty of something. This time the retards put it in writing.
Lmao the lawyers seem mad.
But... but.... the police are our friends!!
bAcK tHe bLuE
tHiN bLuE LiNe
Fuck them all.
I can play that, too. Any time I see an armed cop, anywhere in New York, doing anything, I will assume he is going to perform something unlawful and react appropriately if he makes any threatening gestures.
Fortunately, I don't live in New York. Unfortunately, I don't trust them anywhere else much differently.