After a long hiatus or if there was any doubt regarding identity Q would re-trip and confirm via official channels (i.e. Trump's Twitter account). This didn't happen after the most recent "return". There are some half decent arguments that the trip was compromised, and therefore may not be legit. New posts may not be reliable.
However, Trump has since become more overt with proofs, such as playing Q music in campaign videos and rallies. This may suggest things have moved beyond message boards for comms.
Also, Trump has not only been more overt about Q lately, but he has also become even more specific and aggressive when it comes to him talking about the deep state and corruption, which maybe makes Q also posting redundant.
A number of things, but, mainly substance. 2 years of no posts has left a lot of catching up to do, and a LOT of hardball questions that need answers, and explanations that need to happen before any of us can make the mistake of accepting NewQ as anything affiliated with real Q.
So what you're saying is you're speculating and in your opinion you don't know.
If that is the case, you're possibly misleading people by saying definitively "No. NewQ is fake Q. Don't get mislead."
But that's by your own reasoning. By my reasoning, I can definitively say the trips match.
I'm not casting out speculation (speculation is good), but you're definitively telling people what to think about "new" Q based on your speculation and you further qualified that anything other than what you said would be misleading.
Trips alone are ultimately meaningless due to Chaos Theory- all passwords can be cracked, or otherwise compromised regardless of its complexity. Need more than just that.
My point there is you're telling people definitively what to think admittedly based on speculation and said anything other than what you said is misleading.
I don't know for sure if Q's password was cracked or the website was hacked or misused, but what other alternative is there? If we begin assuming Q's posts with matching tripcodes are fake, how do we know some portion of old Q posts weren't also fake at the time? We're just going to assume contextually without any further comms regarding fake Q posts?
What would have been more ideal is if Q just posted a public key, and could post ubiquitously across different forums as-needed with signed messages. But of course, if Q answered every "hardball question" with specificity, like you claim to expect, then they would have posted a public key.
Anyways, as I said, in regards to Q's posts and matching trips, personally I am going with Occam's Razor and the lack of an alternative, and assuming matching trips are Q for now unless demonstrated otherwise. No outside comms.
...how do we know some portion of old Q posts weren't also fake at the time?
And that is part of the problem with placing too much faith in trip codes, because we DO know that at least one Q post in the past was indeed a fraud post- the infamous "B" post.
Which, ironically enough, was the first post that the NewQ imposter removed from the record.
The B post was never demonstrated to be a hacker, and it wasn't even signed "Q" at the bottom, so we can't even say it claimed to be Q. It didn't have a tripcode either.
Somebody asked "new" Q to remove the B post from Q's private board and it was removed.
You're again speculating, making assumptions based on your speculation, and then presenting it as determinative reality... We don't know B was a fraud post or a hacker, and B never claimed to be Q.
What he's saying is that you're speaking definitively. The truth is, none of us know. And while I do agree that I don't trust 8k anymore, B itself does not preclude that he isn't back somewhere. And, given that Donald's becoming increasingly overt, perhaps then we should be Iooking for deItas on other platforms at the very Ieast. Either way, we all should beopen to all kinds of possibiIities.
https://qposts.online/post/4954
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/16504556.html#16504957
No. NewQ is fake Q. Don't get mislead.
Based on what? As far as I am concerned, the trips match. No outside comms.
After a long hiatus or if there was any doubt regarding identity Q would re-trip and confirm via official channels (i.e. Trump's Twitter account). This didn't happen after the most recent "return". There are some half decent arguments that the trip was compromised, and therefore may not be legit. New posts may not be reliable.
However, Trump has since become more overt with proofs, such as playing Q music in campaign videos and rallies. This may suggest things have moved beyond message boards for comms.
I think I found our answer. :)
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/11192107.html#11192736
">>11192597
Freedom of information [truth] = END
Q"
Perhaps also not necessary anymore with the popularization of Truth Social as well, since the point of the boards was for no censorship
Also, Trump has not only been more overt about Q lately, but he has also become even more specific and aggressive when it comes to him talking about the deep state and corruption, which maybe makes Q also posting redundant.
A number of things, but, mainly substance. 2 years of no posts has left a lot of catching up to do, and a LOT of hardball questions that need answers, and explanations that need to happen before any of us can make the mistake of accepting NewQ as anything affiliated with real Q.
So what you're saying is you're speculating and in your opinion you don't know.
If that is the case, you're possibly misleading people by saying definitively "No. NewQ is fake Q. Don't get mislead."
But that's by your own reasoning. By my reasoning, I can definitively say the trips match.
I'm not casting out speculation (speculation is good), but you're definitively telling people what to think about "new" Q based on your speculation and you further qualified that anything other than what you said would be misleading.
Trips alone are ultimately meaningless due to Chaos Theory- all passwords can be cracked, or otherwise compromised regardless of its complexity. Need more than just that.
My point there is you're telling people definitively what to think admittedly based on speculation and said anything other than what you said is misleading.
I don't know for sure if Q's password was cracked or the website was hacked or misused, but what other alternative is there? If we begin assuming Q's posts with matching tripcodes are fake, how do we know some portion of old Q posts weren't also fake at the time? We're just going to assume contextually without any further comms regarding fake Q posts?
What would have been more ideal is if Q just posted a public key, and could post ubiquitously across different forums as-needed with signed messages. But of course, if Q answered every "hardball question" with specificity, like you claim to expect, then they would have posted a public key.
Anyways, as I said, in regards to Q's posts and matching trips, personally I am going with Occam's Razor and the lack of an alternative, and assuming matching trips are Q for now unless demonstrated otherwise. No outside comms.
And that is part of the problem with placing too much faith in trip codes, because we DO know that at least one Q post in the past was indeed a fraud post- the infamous "B" post.
Which, ironically enough, was the first post that the NewQ imposter removed from the record.
The B post was never demonstrated to be a hacker, and it wasn't even signed "Q" at the bottom, so we can't even say it claimed to be Q. It didn't have a tripcode either.
Somebody asked "new" Q to remove the B post from Q's private board and it was removed.
You're again speculating, making assumptions based on your speculation, and then presenting it as determinative reality... We don't know B was a fraud post or a hacker, and B never claimed to be Q.
What he's saying is that you're speaking definitively. The truth is, none of us know. And while I do agree that I don't trust 8k anymore, B itself does not preclude that he isn't back somewhere. And, given that Donald's becoming increasingly overt, perhaps then we should be Iooking for deItas on other platforms at the very Ieast. Either way, we all should beopen to all kinds of possibiIities.
Huh.. I missed this.
Posts 4954 through 4958 are suspect.
They did not coincide with Trump's tweets, truths or statements. No deltas were established.
The trip code fuckery was also a major problem for the credibility. Watkins and babyfist haven't done enough to clear the suspicion either.
All together, that means we can't trust these posts.
Unless we get SEVERAL new drops with deltas that show Q posts PRECEDE Trump truths/statements, like always, it's more than likely a farce.
Ron Watkins has gone dark! he did terrible in his bid for Congress in Arizona. It was rumored that he was Q.
Ron being Q isn't a rumour, it's a fantasy.
The person above you is retarded
Seems a bit harsh, it might have just been a joke - hard to tell these days.
Fair for sure
( USAISA )