If you get the reference I'll be pretty impressed. ;)
When someone gets redpilled for the first time, it's always "Can it be that I have the world entirely wrong?", and the answer to that is "Not wrong, there's just more to learn!"
If I met myself today, 5 years ago, I would think I was batshit insane. But if you go step by step it all makes sense. I feel (and I hope I am right) that things are coming to a head. Truths will be revealed. There's always more to learn, and I am ready and willing to dive into that rabbit hole!
I am not sure I agree with that. The entire world as we had been raised to believe is different from the way it works, completely 180 degrees. There is no sugarcoating this. Those who realise this will need to go through the full phase of grieving, including despair. You have to finally accept this is true and come out the other side.
And once you do this, you are not the same person anymore. Almost everyone has many aspects of their personality and identity thats closely tied to some aspect of the Matrix, and once thats all shattered you have to starting finding your true self identity, and it might feel a bit boring to the shiny identity you originally had, but thats okay.
Yes.
I'm not going to disagree with you, but maybe there is a different way of looking at it. I've been on a journey, since I was born. Was everything I learned along the way wrong? Maybe. But I think more and more, that there was just "more information" that I was not privy to.
Throughout the whole experience, I am still me. Maybe I can look at it as I was wrong, but instead I think there was more I could learn. More information, that had I known at the time, I would have made different decisions. But I really do like what you said. I'm not the same person. But am I not the same person because who I was is dead? or that I learned more?
I guess I just see it differently from you, I feel lied to, and manipulated, but I am me. Through learning more, I've become a different person. So yeah maybe the old me died, but something of it is left. I really do like what you've said.
What I am getting is that we are on the same page, but we have a different way of looking at it.
Wrong can mean incorrect or wrong as in "right or wrong" as in "Good or bad". You can be incorrect without being bad. The fact that we were lied to, and made to believe in an illusion, and probably did actions based on these beliefs which we would not have otherwise done, brings in a tone of "we were bad people".
Its important to confront this. We were not bad people. We did not know better and we did the best with all the good intentions, but with wrong information.
We were kept in dark not by choice, but by a machine so powerful we almost had no chance against it.
Lets take a concrete example. I am a software guy who spent most of my careers deep in the silicon valley. My identity had always been the guy using technology for the human betterment.
Now that I have come to the realisation that the entire hitech venture capital is a CIA operation, and I can look back and point to every brick I placed and every nail I hammered in building the ultimate slave pen the Cabal always wanted to build and that I was not building any tools of freedom for humanity.
Now I can either deny this - first reaction - and say "only a few people were bad. Only a few software is bad".
Or I can accept the reality, but start hating myself for being a person who did bad things or for being dumb enough to not realise it, or for the entire world view that shattered.
Or I can change my own view from a software guy to a "freedom fighter" who, against all odds, managed to free himself from the invisble shackles, and now helps others do the same.
My point is, the journey from denial to mental freedom is through a phase of pain that is necessary.
I see people here say this but I'm not really sure what you mean. What do you mean it's 180 degrees different? Can you give me some examples? I mean, math isn't different, is it? Water is still wet, and we still need it to survive. Same with oxygen. Or do we? What are you saying is so different? Yeah, we were lied to by TPTB and so called 'trusted' authorities. But you seem to be implying something more and I'd like to understand what you mean. Thanks.
I will give you a few examples. However this thread will be unsuitable / impossible to argue and debate about each and every one of the points.
This is simply the stuff that took 180 degrees in my own belief system. Each of these points probably require a dozen threads to debate and need to be done elsewhere.
Scientists haven't been following true scientific process for a long time. So essentially almost any scientific finding is suspect. Either it is blatantly false (like dark matter/energy/string theory), knowingly fake but hard to prove (like vaccines), possible true hypotheses accepted as facts since they have never been proven (like speed of light, virology, particle physics)
Modern medicine was never intended to cure anything but rather create an illusion of wellbeing with a combination of real short term fixes and long term poisoning of the body
There has been no free market in the world for the past 100 years at least. Its centrally managed and most of the efforts by the financial sector is ensuring this never comes out publicly.
No country in this world is a true republic or a democracy. Few few elections truly reflect the will of the people. We are all part of an Empire living in the illusions of Constitutional governments.
Almost no wars/revolutions/upheavels in the past 3 centuries happened organically, and they all happened against real peoples' will.
Nothing written in the history books can be accepted as truth. Almost every historical event has been written as a narrative.
There exists no real journalism. Journalism was created to propagate and bolster this narrative paradigm (Clif High coined the term Narradigm that perfectly explains this)
Cabal has been controlling the weather using technologies we cannot even begin to imagine. This includes not just tsunamis, famine, forest fires etc, but even possibly earthquakes.
Every natural disaster is now suspect and we will never know what was caused by nature and what was caused by the Cabal directly or indirectly.
No person can go to the top of any field without having to sell their souls. This includes politics, science, technology, legal, arts, you name it. None at all. The selling of the soul is gradual, and starts with a lot of shit testing in the lower realms and outright selling out at the top end.
Finally, and most importantly, spirituality is a very important part of all beings. It has been bent out of shape by all entities be it secular or religious and would be very hard to rebuild the true knowledge.
So yeah, water is wet and we need oxygen to breathe. But the things that we can touch and see and feel make up only a tiny tiny faction of our world, the rest built up indirectly on what we read, listen to and believe in.
Alright, thanks. I agree with some of your assertions, but question others. You seem pretty confident in what you had to say and I suppose that that makes me question your premises because, as much as we do know, there's so much more that we don't know (imo and I think, axiomatically) So confidence in either direction seems futile at this point.
For example, I agree that science is suspect, that's pretty obvious. But I am not prepared to allege that things like dark matter and string theory are 'knowingly fake.' I haven't looked into either enough to determine if I believe falsehoods are knowingly being pushed. That might be the case, but I have no knowledge of that at this point and I'm not even sure what it would take to prove to me that the theories are not even viable. Short of discovering a trove of documents where scientists are laughing about how they've 'put one over' on us, or seeing science explained (and demonstrated) in such a way that proves them impossible, I don't even know how I could disprove something like that. This is what I mean about being adamant either way. I don't know enough about those theories to attempt to prove them, nor enough to know how to disprove them.
Other things are easier, like the lack of professional journalism, or even weather modification. Spirituality is another one that seems futile to try to disprove. But I think I understand the broad concept you were stating (the 180 degree turnaround) so thanks for explaining. I appreciate it.
Regarding Dark Matter/Energy. Essentially you have a set of theories to explain the universe. Then you have a set of observations. You work out the formulae from the theories and plugin the values from the observations. You find out that those formula does not work.
You now have two choices. You can either say that the set of theories are wrong and go back to the drawing board and come up with new theories. This might require undoing a lot of assumptions that have been accepted in the past.
Or you can choose to add unknown quantities to the formula just to make them work and call these quantities dark energy and dark matter.
They chose the second option. It is not following scientific methods. You dont claim reality is different based on your theories. You work on your theories until it matches reality.
Its fraud, plain and simple. The real question is, why are they pushing these theories so forcefully instead of going back and rewinding the assumptions?
I strongly think it will open up an entirely different picture of the universe, probably closer to what people like Tesla were envisioning.
As for the string theory, my stand is anecdotal. I used to have a few physicists in my circles in the 2000s, and even then they all used to openly scoff at string theory. It was almost an open joke. But none of them would ever professionally put that on record. I believe (I am out of that scene now) that even main stream science has moved past string theory now. There was a whole storyline in Big Bang Theory about this, and it shows how scientists can knowingly research wrong/fake things without actually being bad. For some, its simply a question of being in denial since it would negate everything they achieved/believed in their career.
You dont need this. It does not matter if the scientists are doing this fully conscious of it, or they are doing it in their own denial. The simple fact is, they are not following scientific methods and true spirit of science, and if you want to call it professional criminal negligence, fine. For me, its knowingly pushing fake stuff.
Interesting about your friends and string theory. And I would certainly agree that if scientists are plugging in what works, rather than following the scientific method, than that's of little value and certainly inappropriate, even fraudulent. It's a reminder that science can be viewed as a commodity, like just about everything else. Buy the right guy, pay the right amount and get the result you want.
I personally believe that the reason a lot of people can't seem to face the truth is the same as the comment you made about the fact that it might prove them wrong in everything they've believed in. But if you're 80 and face the truth knowing you've been wrong for 80 years, I still consider that preferable to continuing in your wrongness for eternity.
You've been good about answering, so I really don't want to impose, but if you are so inclined, would you please give me a synopsis of Tesla's view of the universe? Which is apparently what you now believe to be the truth. Thanks.
To put it in very simplistic terms, existence of Aether. He equated Aether as the cause of electricity (and magnetism), and read it as Aether being the medium for electromagnetic waves to propagate in.
Just thinking with common sense, it never made sense to me that electromagnetic waves could propagate without a medium. If there is no medium, what exactly is propagating?
If the existence of Aether is true, it turns the physics upside down. The speed of light would no longer be a constant regardless of the frame of reference. This means end to most of Einstein's relativity. I would say this ends the whole quantum physics field. Who knows, perhaps the equations will become balanced without need for Dark Matter and Energy.
We already are being told by the Science high priests that Big Bang Theory might not be true. This is already causing a lot fo scientists agony and anguish apparently. I havent thought too much about the implications of existence of Aether on origin of universe. However I do think the disclosure is happening slowly.
Whats the real implication of Aether? Tesla's free energy. He has always said that energy is all around us. You can simply tap into it if you know how. He built the famous Tesla tower that was shut down by his investors when they found out it was intended to produce free energy.
TL;DR - I believe there is a case to be made that the entire quantum physics is a fiction created to suppress free energy.
Fascinating. That certainly would turn things upside down and cause not a few nervous breakdowns among physicists. Thanks. I'll look more deeply into the topic when I have a chance. I appreciate it.
That's a great response to give to someone in conversation!
You're right - I would haver thought that my 5-years-older me was ready for the looney bin 🤣