Very simply, the point is that until now, Podesta has not been a senior govt official. Q posted this in 2017 - how would he have known Podesta would once again hold a senior govt position? That is the "decode" they are referring to.
Podesta has not been in any capacity as an “Official” until now. This would make a literal interpretation of this statement, now, possible. Think of it like a lawyer. The statement says ”more senior officials”. 1. Others more SENIOR are ALSO OFFICIALS 2. Podesta then legally would have to be an OFFIClAL, which he now is.
It’s not a proof. Its kind of a ‘decode’ … pretty good one too.
Thanks... but, then what does that mean... a decode?
I guess, why should I be excited about this other than that everyone else is excited so it must mean something good? : )
Very simply, the point is that until now, Podesta has not been a senior govt official. Q posted this in 2017 - how would he have known Podesta would once again hold a senior govt position? That is the "decode" they are referring to.
Ahah... thanks! That makes great sense, now. I appreciate it.
OK. If K.C. is "King Charles," Who is K.D.? Or am I not reading that right
There is no KC or KD. Those are likely date markers. If you replace 11.3 with “ KC “ it doesn't make sense grammatically.
Podesta has not been in any capacity as an “Official” until now. This would make a literal interpretation of this statement, now, possible. Think of it like a lawyer. The statement says ”more senior officials”. 1. Others more SENIOR are ALSO OFFICIALS 2. Podesta then legally would have to be an OFFIClAL, which he now is.
So the military, MI is controlling Biden. He’s not obeying orders from Obama, Soros, DS
What? When did Biden enter the conversation?
I appreciate your helpful clarification. Thanks!