So You telling me that this(A plane's nosecone that was hit by a bird) cut straight through a steel exoskeleton and reinforced concrete...AND came out the other side virtually intact...Yeah OK...😏😏
(media.greatawakening.win)
*** SEE TOP COMMENT ***
Retarded post. The nose cone is made of fiberglass. Most bird strikes happen on approach/takeoff where the aircraft is at slow speeds. The aircraft struck the towers at 580 mph. Learn how kinetic energy works. At the bottom of the towers, the steel was almost four inches thick, but, as the load tapers on the way up, the thickness of the steel required also tapers. At the 79th floor, where the first plane impacted the WTC, the steel was only 1/4" thick.
Also, I personallysaw the 2nd plane.
THE MORE YOU KNOW.
Cats, I'd like to sit at your feet and listen to what you have to say on this topic. Please direct me to previous threads containing your wisdom on this subject.
Haha, I hear your sarcasm but hey, what can I say 🙄😂
Oh, Cats! I'm not being sarcastic at all; I'm dead serious. You're claiming first-hand knowledge, which I happen to hold in high regard. Seriously, I would love to read your account.
Well, other than the fact that I was there, I don't have much else to say. I've been in all these buildings (at one time you could sign up for a tour of the Salomon Smith Barney trading floor). I've just read all the studies and understand the basic physics. I went to journalism school in the midwest. One time I Category 3 tornado was roaming around and destroyed a hardware store. We found 3 ft lengths of PVC pipe that the wind had slammed into and 100% through a telephone pole. That's The Power of this kinetic energy I am talking about. Anyway. Back to the salt mines!
Let me say again, and again and again and again. All buildings that are brought down in controlled demolitions are significantly weakened. Remember the Israeli art team running around the towers in the months before 9/11? Remember the numerous reports of dust and loud sounds of construction on closed floors?
Exactly...This notion that Planes were solely to blame for the Towers collapse is complete BS....There is so much info/facts out there and people still believe its the fucking "hijacked planes" ....just like at the Pentagon...The Destruction caused by the 'plane's impact' would have meant the plane would have had to be almost Ground level....Some fucking piloting skills there for a Part-time pilot wouldn't you say?...
This. There's NO way the buildings were brought down with the impacts. The Architects of the buildings even said so themselves on video, stating that they had specifically designed the buildings to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 707, which was at the time the largest aircraft in the air. Absolutely not, you are correct. There is absolutely no way to explain, for instance, all the molten steel that was coming up out of the ground for weeks and weeks and even months afterwards.
This. The thermite was necessary to weaken the outer structure. The steel beam mesh on the outside of the building was 40% of the load. The squibs were from the termite and cutters. The nuclear plutonium charges were magnetically focused inwards on the core (which is where the molten steel came from). Look up the BB18 image
Seriously??.... So I'm Retarded for showing facts.?? Really..Pictures showing the crumpled nose of a Boeing 737 following the dramatic MIDAIR impact!.... Not Slow speed...
https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/unbelievable-images-show-damage-to-plane-after-a-bird-strike/news-story/ac95d59c235831528a9e6bbcd84d5f19
I also refer you to this Pic.... it was travelling at a slow speed and didn't even 'dent' the pole https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZjwa0NXwAEKRpL?format=jpg&name=small
Remember the almost perfect outline of the Airplane where it penetrated the outside...Are you trying to tell me that the wings cut through steel and concrete like wet newspaper to leave a distinct outline of the aircraft???..... Also, I didn't say that there were no Aircraft...I'm saying that Aircraft are not the cause of the Towers Collapsing....There's a difference...
Exactly. The plane was going at a slow speed. The kinetic energy is what cuts. Look up YouTube videos of dudes throwing playing cards into baseball bats. Same principle
Edit - look at how water jets work. How does water cut 2" steel??
And that's looks like an aluminum pole.
Again, its in the heading of my post...You just reinforced the FACT that a nosecone would just crumple coming into contact with ANY object let alone penetrating steel and concrete, going all the way through and then exiting the other side of steel and concrete (even as the steel was only 1/4" thick) INTACT as we all saw... And you call my post Retarded???? I'm all up for different opinions but that's pretty much insulting a lot of people's intelligence....
No. At sufficient speeds it is a matter of kinetic energy.
Want to insult your intelligence? What determines the cutting speed/energy needed to cut a material? The speed of sound in that material. Look it up. Travelling sufficiently fast, s tiny object can penetrate anything. ONLY when it slows past this threshold the penetrator will begin to deform.. This is how bunker buster bombs work
Precisely....Yet it (2nd plane)went straight through the entire tower and came out the other side...INTACT...Remember...How's that possible???
Dude. This is "personal incredulity" fallacy. Just because something sounds unbelievable doesn't make it not true.
Look at the tests NASA did, shooting shuttle fuel tank insulating FOAM at models of the shuttle wing. It penetrated something like two feet into an exact replica of the wing before deforming/breaking apart
Kinetic energy is king
LOL no it didn't, it went through and deformed along the way. The MASS x SPEED is what matters at impact. The only reason anything came through on the 2nd impact is because it was an oblique angle impact where a large portion of the plane missed the concrete/steel lattice core. I personally saw the landing gear from the impact