Don't think so... Francis leader.substack.com royalty is not the crown ...America's constitution signed by members of inner temple of city of London so not worth anything....
Francis goes all through it in rule of law...it's the pope that controls everything
Heard a lot about it in Trump's first year as president, but I can no longer remember the details or where I socked away the information about it. That was alleged to have happened during that first world tour. They said he went around with volumes of hard evidence of the crimes of world leaders (including the pope), and forced them to capitulate to his demands. I think the Vatican was the last stop, and it would have been then that he took their keys, so to speak. In pictures of that particular visit, the pope does look particularly unhappy, but an expression is no proof. He might have been constipated that day or just unhappy that Trump was in the same building. (Trump, on the other hand looked like he was at a party.)
If all this is true, it lends more credence to the idea that we are indeed watching a scripted movie that is meant to awaken the people who are still hypnotized. Q said, "You have to show them," and as time went on, I saw the wisdom of that.
Yes I read that too. Freake said it as did others before him. It gave me lots of hope which has been crumbling the last year ......
Certainly the leading actors have all been replaced ..some don't even look that much like the originals...stepford wives isn't in it! Bidan prince Charles queen John Kerry hunter pelosi ..lots of Congress....so if the good guys are in control I can see this is a movie...what if the bad guys are doing it? But then why would they need to?
Speaking for myself I am tired of it and not looking forward to a harsh winter with energy costs being the prices they are.....I hate the cold!
Here in UK lots of old people will die of hyperthermia and neglect as so many now frightened to go near a doctor or a hospital for fear of being jabbed and shoved on a ventilator with doses of midazolam to finish them off.
Why can't the alliance change the frequencies of music for a start?...right now that would make a tremendous difference ..if healing frequencies were being played and the water had the fluoride removed these two things alone would make the world more peaceful and help to wake people from the hypnotic spell they are under...the fact it isn't being done makes me wonder about an alliance altogether.
So I am in a middle place..neither believing or disbelieving!
First rule is that the parties must be identified. In the case of the Declaration the presumption is that ALL who signed were esquires. Then it is assumed that these esquires were not properly authorized.
A declaration is not a contract. It is, what we call: a missive. Just to give closure on certain matters.
The oath within the declaration only binds those ascending to it initially only the signers and those in whose name they sign if and when properly authorized.
In the case of the Paris Peace treaty the same hold true, as the esquires, as representatives of the United States of America signed the treaty. There is a lie in there: as it says: plenipotentiary.
They are not, as they cannot conclude a deal. The deal has to be ratified by the senate.
That Britain payed money to support the effort of Congress for the .gov operation can very well be part of the deal of the final settlement.
Francis went on a tangent there and the limb broke off.
Ok, here' s a contract to be signed by representatives of two parties. The representatives are all members of the same club. However, when the contract is concluded, the process of ratification comes into view, and only after ratification, the contract goes into effect. In international law, an instrument is send to all related parties to inform them ratification of the contract has cleared positively.
Does that invalidate the contract? Because if your answer is yes, then no one, having studied at the same place, can conclude business together.
It would also mean that Britain would be incapable of making contracts with say: the Republic of the 7 Provinces, or With China in them days.
Check the signatories ..... and remember ... the temple bar existed since the 1200....
Although, I think that Frances has a point when he recounts how such a system could easily lead to conflicts of interests .... it is the authorization of the representatives by means of letters by an authorizing body and the ratification that puts things into effect.
With this in mind, read again the Paris Peace Treaty. What Frances did not see, but I did, is a last paragraph ..... about the debts!
And it is through the banking system that Britain wields tremendous power.
Perhaps you know the answer to this question.....as Washington DC the Vatican and inner London all separate states with its own laws are they able to be prosecuted for their chicanery? Or are they like royalty exempt from the laws of the land? Probably why the Irish put the bomb on Mountbattens boat!
Also as temple bar isn't an organisation or anything does this mean they get away with what they have done?
It seems that turning countries and people into corporations has made understanding the law difficult in that admiralty law is not for the benefit of we the People but them the thieves and killers. And here in UK solicitors don't do class actions even.... the justice system is totally corrupt
Don't think so... Francis leader.substack.com royalty is not the crown ...America's constitution signed by members of inner temple of city of London so not worth anything....
Francis goes all through it in rule of law...it's the pope that controls everything
Interesting. What about the contention that Trump became the exchequer of the global finance system of the Vatican in his first year as president?
I know nothing about that..would be fantastic if true...
Heard a lot about it in Trump's first year as president, but I can no longer remember the details or where I socked away the information about it. That was alleged to have happened during that first world tour. They said he went around with volumes of hard evidence of the crimes of world leaders (including the pope), and forced them to capitulate to his demands. I think the Vatican was the last stop, and it would have been then that he took their keys, so to speak. In pictures of that particular visit, the pope does look particularly unhappy, but an expression is no proof. He might have been constipated that day or just unhappy that Trump was in the same building. (Trump, on the other hand looked like he was at a party.)
If all this is true, it lends more credence to the idea that we are indeed watching a scripted movie that is meant to awaken the people who are still hypnotized. Q said, "You have to show them," and as time went on, I saw the wisdom of that.
Here ya go... https://www.bitchute.com/video/AEJ8GviWjpur/
Yes I read that too. Freake said it as did others before him. It gave me lots of hope which has been crumbling the last year ......
Certainly the leading actors have all been replaced ..some don't even look that much like the originals...stepford wives isn't in it! Bidan prince Charles queen John Kerry hunter pelosi ..lots of Congress....so if the good guys are in control I can see this is a movie...what if the bad guys are doing it? But then why would they need to?
Speaking for myself I am tired of it and not looking forward to a harsh winter with energy costs being the prices they are.....I hate the cold!
Here in UK lots of old people will die of hyperthermia and neglect as so many now frightened to go near a doctor or a hospital for fear of being jabbed and shoved on a ventilator with doses of midazolam to finish them off.
Why can't the alliance change the frequencies of music for a start?...right now that would make a tremendous difference ..if healing frequencies were being played and the water had the fluoride removed these two things alone would make the world more peaceful and help to wake people from the hypnotic spell they are under...the fact it isn't being done makes me wonder about an alliance altogether.
So I am in a middle place..neither believing or disbelieving!
Exchequer of the world, DJT.... https://www.bitchute.com/video/AEJ8GviWjpur/
Eh ... not quite.
First rule is that the parties must be identified. In the case of the Declaration the presumption is that ALL who signed were esquires. Then it is assumed that these esquires were not properly authorized.
A declaration is not a contract. It is, what we call: a missive. Just to give closure on certain matters.
The oath within the declaration only binds those ascending to it initially only the signers and those in whose name they sign if and when properly authorized.
In the case of the Paris Peace treaty the same hold true, as the esquires, as representatives of the United States of America signed the treaty. There is a lie in there: as it says: plenipotentiary.
They are not, as they cannot conclude a deal. The deal has to be ratified by the senate.
That Britain payed money to support the effort of Congress for the .gov operation can very well be part of the deal of the final settlement.
Francis went on a tangent there and the limb broke off.
Can you simplify that for me please....are you saying it's all ok? It was fixed with Britain's aid?
Ok, here' s a contract to be signed by representatives of two parties. The representatives are all members of the same club. However, when the contract is concluded, the process of ratification comes into view, and only after ratification, the contract goes into effect. In international law, an instrument is send to all related parties to inform them ratification of the contract has cleared positively.
Does that invalidate the contract? Because if your answer is yes, then no one, having studied at the same place, can conclude business together.
It would also mean that Britain would be incapable of making contracts with say: the Republic of the 7 Provinces, or With China in them days.
I would recommend to look up on archive.org: https://archive.org/details/europeantreatie00paulgoog: European treaties bearing on the history of the United States and its dependencies.
Check the signatories ..... and remember ... the temple bar existed since the 1200....
Although, I think that Frances has a point when he recounts how such a system could easily lead to conflicts of interests .... it is the authorization of the representatives by means of letters by an authorizing body and the ratification that puts things into effect.
With this in mind, read again the Paris Peace Treaty. What Frances did not see, but I did, is a last paragraph ..... about the debts!
And it is through the banking system that Britain wields tremendous power.
Frances is a granny!!!
Thank you for the information.....
Perhaps you know the answer to this question.....as Washington DC the Vatican and inner London all separate states with its own laws are they able to be prosecuted for their chicanery? Or are they like royalty exempt from the laws of the land? Probably why the Irish put the bomb on Mountbattens boat!
Also as temple bar isn't an organisation or anything does this mean they get away with what they have done?
It seems that turning countries and people into corporations has made understanding the law difficult in that admiralty law is not for the benefit of we the People but them the thieves and killers. And here in UK solicitors don't do class actions even.... the justice system is totally corrupt