HIDDEN VIDEO SHOWING WHAT REALLY HIT THE PENTAGON
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (147)
sorted by:
People say what they know. "Scud" missile. No.
It WAS, however, a cruise missile. My background has many things and many hats I wore while serving in the Military. One of these hats was an Aircraft Mishap Investigator. What significance is that? Glad you asked and I'll be as brief as possible to get the point across.
As an Investigator, you are trained in all sorts of "tells" so you can identify what went wrong by looking at a heap of metal confetti and a smoking hole. This ranges in everything of flight characteristics of all types of aircraft, to what systems it carries/uses. In this particular context, there is absolutely NO commercial pilot good enough to fly 4-5 feet off the ground over varied terrain, through telephone poles and streetlights, to hit the exact spot where auditing was taking place by internal investigations in the disappearance of 3.2 trillion dollars (remember rumsfeld on live TV talking about it?).
Added to that, I served almost 7 yrs in Special Ops during the 90's and have seen up close what a cruise missile does, as well its aftermath. "Up close" being relative to not being part of the blast for any pedants out there.
Fact: There is ZERO chance any aircraft built, or the parts that make it up, can punch thru 5 layers of spaced reinforced concrete plus internal beams and walls of someplace like the Pentagon. It would absolutely disintegrate within the first "ring", mostly upon smashing the first outer wall.
Fact: A cruise missile can punch thru 5 layers/walls; that IS what it is made to do.
The hole size of the Pentagon does NOT match up with the airframe size, nor does it have ANY of the traits associated with an aircraft hitting the site...but a cruise missile does.
Questions:
There was a hole for a "fuselage" which is the lightest and most destructible part of any aircraft, but there were NOT any holes punched for the engines which are the heaviest and most dense metal content?
If you view the photos of the up close aftermath, it shows floors of the building sheared away from the blast. Ok, by why are there wooden desks, chairs, pictures on walls still, and unburnt papers on those floors? Aren't aircraft full of fuel that would have incinerated all of that? Would a quick flash-blast of an explosive warhead leave some things untouched as they were shielded from the blast by a lower floor?
Why wasn't the grass burnt to the dirt by spilled jet fuel? Why wasn't the asphalt burnt the same? Why were walls not charred black by burning JP8 fuel?
Hint: these questions are called rhetorical.
I said it the day it happened and I've been saying it ever since: That was not a plane that hit the Pentagon, it was a cruise missile.
100%
ok so where would this missile have come from then? what was within the vicinity of the pentagon capable of launching a missile? I do not believe ANYTHING we were told by the way.
Probably a shipping container somewhere lol
any evidence of that
All of the evidence is with the FBI, or probably by now, long since shredded, digital copies wiped (like with a cloth? cackles), and any hope of filing together REAL evidence is long gone. Hopefully, some FBI was dumb enough and cocky enough, to keep a copy for whatever egotistical reason he has, and the white hats have that, OR, they may have it all along, and they're waiting to release it. These are the options, I tend to believe the first is true :(
why would there be evidence? I'd love to have evidence of it but it really wouldn't be hard to prevent that especially in the days before everyone had a camera in their pocket.
And where was the video shot from?
We, The US, have shipping containers hiding missiles/launch systems that can be moved into your neighborhood and you'd never know what it was.
Currently, these systems are positioned all over the US and moved regularly.
Now you know.
A cruise missile has a range of 1,000 miles. DC is only 125 miles to the Atlantic Ocean and less than 200 from Norfolk Naval Base. One could even hit DC from the Gulf of Mexico.
Wouldn't it be taking out everything in it's path though?
?
No, what do you mean take out everything in its path. It's a missile. It only hits the designated target. It flies well out of line of sight of the target, then approaches the target as programmed. Probably flew in low to avoid any anti-air weaponry that might blow it up.
It's convenient for the DS I'm sure, to set up the missile defense, then send a missile at it, themselves. They knew exactly how to defend from it, yet they exploited its weakness.
it went through traffic. it stopped at all stop signs and red lights to go undetected.
OBJECTION your honor! There was an engine found at the site. Strange since it wasnt the same make nor model of the engine that said plane would have been fitted with!
That is correct, it was junk debris they trucked in and scattered. The original vids and pictures show no plane parts, much less engines, anywhere in sight.
I mean, was it also clean and not mangled?
Since it's a Q board, here's Q's answer:
Drop 2221:
Question: Was the Pentagon hit by plane on 911
Answer: Yes
From Merriam-Webster:
airplane noun air·plane ˈer-ˌplān : a powered heavier-than-air aircraft with fixed wings from which it derives most of its lift
Cruise Missiles are defined as aircraft.
Q would not answer to directly implicate such an atrocity. Q WOULD answer in a general manner that could be taken however a predetermined group conscious bias has already been accepted. Many drops are proof of this. Additionally, it was said more than once, that drops were not necessarily meant for us and had additional meanings. Q also said some drops were disinformation. That can go two ways.
I'm telling you what I know from years of experience investigating such things, not as some basement dwelling wanna-be who read a wiki page wanting internet clout.
I'll say it again: It was a cruise missile.
Discussed to death on voat when this dropped -
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=airplane+definition&ia=definition
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/AGM-86_ALCM.JPEG
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-86_ALCM
Doesn't the term 'plane' infer that it is manned though?
You mean like a paper airPLANE? 🤭🤣
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5p8JjDyT5F4/maxresdefault.jpg
THIS!! 👆