Guess what time the Queen was lowered?...
4:49pm London Time...
Exactly what I was pointing to earlier....ππ
(media.greatawakening.win)
Cabal=History
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (182)
sorted by:
But those are different Q posts... tying the watch to the event means that you searched 4:49 and found the watch picture. But the watch picture is not tied to the 9/19 picture. They are still a good couplet, but it was far stronger if the watch picture had been on 9/19--that was what I was excited about.
It's still valuable. Just not quite the OHMYGOD proof.
Look at the date on the watch....
Good catch
Not every Q-Post is tied to only 1 event. Donβt forget βMultiple Meaningsβ Anon.
Correct...πππ
You have two puzzle pieces fren. 4:49 is a notable Q time as is the delta for castle LOCK. Don't beat yourself up too bad. Props for owning a human error. This is still a big deal.
ππ
That's a bit of an assumption to make, don't you think?
Never Assume Anything....
Its not just the 'picture'...
(If you look close enough you might seeβ¦.Q)
Okay... I see, now... because the date of the watch is a 19, it's an even stronger fit.
So, whereas a single Q post of a picture of a watch with 4:49, date of 19 posted on September 19th 2018 and the words "Castle LOCK" WOULD have been a jaw-dropping A+ Q proof...
And a post of a picture of a watch with the date 19 and time 4:49 but not posted by Q on 9/19 coupled with the "Castle LOCK" from the 9/19/2018 post is a B+ Q Proof (still way above average, but not jaw-dropping, in my opinion).
Sorry for the assumptions.
π NP...Its all good...
Maybe not to you. It'd hardly esoteric giving the claims are made way in advance.