If this were true, they would have to have made 4.5 million blocks this way. And if this were true, we would find blocks with indentations from either fingers or hands, footprints, etc. And if this were useful, it would have been used not just in the pyramids, but elsewhere in the temples, etc. We have the quarries from those temples, however, where they were using natural stone. So, this would only have been used in ancient projects.
The pyramids are not built entirely of limestone. Inside the Great Pyramid (Cheops/Khafre) there are granite stones perfectly placed, some weighing 100-400 tonnes. These would have been quarried far away, and are finished with total precision, absolute perfection (seriously, I see the pyramids every day right, they are mindblowing). The problem is that we do not have in the archaeological record the tools necessary to produce these blocks. We don't know where they come from.
My personal theory is that the best of the pyramids (the three on the plateau) are extremely ancient, up to 70,000 of years old.
A big misconception they were built by slaves. Iirc have read that the nutritional fare alone required to facilitate people staying alive during the building would be hugely expensive. These guys were dedicated craftsmen
Except that contradicts the Bible’s timeline. Unless they were made before man was. I’m no Bible scholar, and I don’t think the Bible specifically talks about time. But the years are there. And smarter people than me says we’ve only been here around 7000 yrs.
I tend to believe the Bible on our timeline rather than “scientists”’who have an theory.
There is nothing in the Bible that states this. This is long-shot conspiracy bullshit from Daniel, adding days as years, blah blah blah. The begats state everyone's age in terms of years, but somehow we're supposed to "decode" the age of the planet, etc., from silliness in Daniel?
The Earth being older than 7000 years doesn't change the fact that God is great. In fact, when you look at what the ancients were able to do with the Great pyramids, it proves God's love even more and more.
The 6k year creation theory is absurd when considering the totality of evidence.
Really, the pyramid enclosure contains a star calendar that would either line up with around 10k BC (or ~26000 years before that, earlier would go in the face of evidence that modern humans were around).
IMO, whatever the reason the pyramids were made, it no longer functions that way.
We talk about how almost every part of our history is more than likely wrong. Why would we believe a guy saying...this rock is 48million years old. Or 100,000 years old. Or 10 years old. Hey, this is how they done it! Here’s a guaranteed fact. Humans aren’t near as smart as they think they are.
Interesting that Book of Enoch describes how after the flood, Nimrod found writing left on large stones by the deceased nephilim which was how he got his power - thru the knowledge God had sought to eradicate by flooding the evil out of the world.
Wonder about whether these were pre-flood creations?
Fucking ay, im laughing my ass off over here. The answer is so fucking simple, only an idiot can believe these were made by aliens. Yet somehow an idiot has millions of listeners tune into his podcast where he ignores these simple truths.
"WhErE DiD tHeY fInD sUcH lArGe StOnEs? ThErEs No LiMeStOnE tHaT bIg WhErE tHeY wErE bUiLt. PlUs tHeY wErE bUiLt ToO pErFeCtLy FoR tHeIr KnOwLeDgE oF mAtH aT tHe TiMe."
They didn't, they were small stones made out of cement mix and stacked together, then fused the same way they were mixed. The math is simple and based in logic, yet people think these empires were incapable of doing the math required to build these. We know the math on how to build space elevators, so where is it?
The fact the truth is THAT simple and it's been known for so long, really drives me crazy. Right now we have guys like Joe Rogan who thinks these civilizations were aided by aliens and were far more complex than what we know. The history and science is right there, Joe, shut up about aliens already!
It's not geopolymer. There ARE large stones used, especially in the middle pyramid, southeast corner. There's plenty of granite used in the interior structure, as well as the whole thing was originally encased in granite before that layer was torn down and re-used in the millenia since. Don't be ignorant, and more importantly, don't be a condescending asshole, leave that behavior for our enemies. Keep digging.
The aliens thing is a thought-trap and pisses me off too. Any time I broach the subject, everyone always immediately goes to the alien hypothesis. The idea that our civilization is a linear technological progression is too deeply engrained. An alternative is that civilization ebbs and flows (due to earth's catastrophe cycle) and that our ancient predecessors had high technology of a type we cannot currently fathom, though likely had to do with crystal or aural tech paths (maybe psychic? Maybe a combination) that allowed them to shape and move enormous stone thousands of kilometers. The megalithic structures of Peru and Egypt (and others) cannot be explained otherwise, unless you wanna throw aliens into the mix.
Trust them or not, but Forbes did a piece on how this stuff was moved and where it was quarried from. Based on it, it sounds like the original pyramids fell apart and slowly but surely they figured out what was necessary to make a long standing structure. It just so happened to require all kinds of stone from various places, and they depicted showing how these things were moved.
I've been to Meidum, the partially collapsed pyramid mentioned in the article. What they don't mention is that it and the mastabas are built on much, much, MUCH older megalithic structures underneath. I've also been to quarry in Aswan and it has this mind-bogglingly gigantic 1400 ton half-excavated granite obelisk with what seems like large scoop marks where it was being dug out. The official timeline and expalantions are full of these inconsistencies that don't hold up to scrutiny once you start looking.
If you're curious and don't mind longhand research videos, UnchartedX on YouTube does a phenomenal job of delving into these topics of ancient history/tech in Egypt and Peru. Nothing beats seeing these first-hand, though.
Recreated? By who? Who's trying to recreate the pyramids? No one is recreating them, but people have learned how it was done.
"We have discovered through archaeological digs, the tools used to build these structures, and how these tools were utilized to accomplish this task. The tools used by the Egyptians were very simple and consisted primarily of two devices. The first being a right angle rod marked along its length with increments denoting cubits. A hole was drilled on one end, where a plumb line would have attached, and the second tool was an unmarked rod with a hole at one end.
The idea behind this was first for one worker to look through the hole of the unmarked rod, and sight both the plumb line (which was held by a second worker) and a specified star. Then according to the foundation ceremonies, the worker would then face towards Ursa Major, and search for the polar star (which back then was Thuban located in the constellation of Draco). Once this star was located the worker then marked a line running from north to south coinciding with the notched increments of the other rod, pretty easy huh. This simple method was utilized to layout the foundations of every structure that adorns the landscape of Egypt."
And that's not even getting into the math portion of the article itself, just the device they used to layout the foundation.
If you would like to do this the simple way... Go to an auto parts store and buy some Blue Devil headgasket repair. It's actualy "water glass" or silica desolved in water and lye. mix it with sand in a mold so it's wet. When exposed to CO2 it will turn into a rock.
UFO's or a greater civilisation that has been wiped from our memories. The Egyptians of a few thousand years ago tried to re-create the pyramids along the Nile river and most of them have collapsed or degraded
Fascinating. I'm in Egypt right now, actually!
If this were true, they would have to have made 4.5 million blocks this way. And if this were true, we would find blocks with indentations from either fingers or hands, footprints, etc. And if this were useful, it would have been used not just in the pyramids, but elsewhere in the temples, etc. We have the quarries from those temples, however, where they were using natural stone. So, this would only have been used in ancient projects.
The pyramids are not built entirely of limestone. Inside the Great Pyramid (Cheops/Khafre) there are granite stones perfectly placed, some weighing 100-400 tonnes. These would have been quarried far away, and are finished with total precision, absolute perfection (seriously, I see the pyramids every day right, they are mindblowing). The problem is that we do not have in the archaeological record the tools necessary to produce these blocks. We don't know where they come from.
My personal theory is that the best of the pyramids (the three on the plateau) are extremely ancient, up to 70,000 of years old.
A big misconception they were built by slaves. Iirc have read that the nutritional fare alone required to facilitate people staying alive during the building would be hugely expensive. These guys were dedicated craftsmen
Well they outdate the earth by about 50,000 years then.
Except that contradicts the Bible’s timeline. Unless they were made before man was. I’m no Bible scholar, and I don’t think the Bible specifically talks about time. But the years are there. And smarter people than me says we’ve only been here around 7000 yrs.
I tend to believe the Bible on our timeline rather than “scientists”’who have an theory.
Go to https://www.icr.org/ Great resource.
There is nothing in the Bible that states this. This is long-shot conspiracy bullshit from Daniel, adding days as years, blah blah blah. The begats state everyone's age in terms of years, but somehow we're supposed to "decode" the age of the planet, etc., from silliness in Daniel?
The Earth being older than 7000 years doesn't change the fact that God is great. In fact, when you look at what the ancients were able to do with the Great pyramids, it proves God's love even more and more.
The 6k year creation theory is absurd when considering the totality of evidence.
Really, the pyramid enclosure contains a star calendar that would either line up with around 10k BC (or ~26000 years before that, earlier would go in the face of evidence that modern humans were around).
IMO, whatever the reason the pyramids were made, it no longer functions that way.
It could be older than 7000 yrs. Like 8000 years.
We talk about how almost every part of our history is more than likely wrong. Why would we believe a guy saying...this rock is 48million years old. Or 100,000 years old. Or 10 years old. Hey, this is how they done it! Here’s a guaranteed fact. Humans aren’t near as smart as they think they are.
I don’t care anymore how they were built, I want to know why they were built!
the pyramids are in the same alignment arrangement as the orion belt. Look into it
Why was the Taj Mahal built?
Was it not essentially a mausoleum?
Yes and it’s greatness was inspired by his love for his wife.
Most likley something to do with water.
Watch brian forester on youtube, he takes you on pov tours pointing out the megalithic stuff and the much more modern building techniques.
The pyramids themselves are amazing an semi explainable what isnt is how the foundations and underground were built.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EzrV0A-JpOg
Interesting that Book of Enoch describes how after the flood, Nimrod found writing left on large stones by the deceased nephilim which was how he got his power - thru the knowledge God had sought to eradicate by flooding the evil out of the world.
Wonder about whether these were pre-flood creations?
Fucking ay, im laughing my ass off over here. The answer is so fucking simple, only an idiot can believe these were made by aliens. Yet somehow an idiot has millions of listeners tune into his podcast where he ignores these simple truths.
"WhErE DiD tHeY fInD sUcH lArGe StOnEs? ThErEs No LiMeStOnE tHaT bIg WhErE tHeY wErE bUiLt. PlUs tHeY wErE bUiLt ToO pErFeCtLy FoR tHeIr KnOwLeDgE oF mAtH aT tHe TiMe."
They didn't, they were small stones made out of cement mix and stacked together, then fused the same way they were mixed. The math is simple and based in logic, yet people think these empires were incapable of doing the math required to build these. We know the math on how to build space elevators, so where is it?
The fact the truth is THAT simple and it's been known for so long, really drives me crazy. Right now we have guys like Joe Rogan who thinks these civilizations were aided by aliens and were far more complex than what we know. The history and science is right there, Joe, shut up about aliens already!
It's not geopolymer. There ARE large stones used, especially in the middle pyramid, southeast corner. There's plenty of granite used in the interior structure, as well as the whole thing was originally encased in granite before that layer was torn down and re-used in the millenia since. Don't be ignorant, and more importantly, don't be a condescending asshole, leave that behavior for our enemies. Keep digging.
The aliens thing is a thought-trap and pisses me off too. Any time I broach the subject, everyone always immediately goes to the alien hypothesis. The idea that our civilization is a linear technological progression is too deeply engrained. An alternative is that civilization ebbs and flows (due to earth's catastrophe cycle) and that our ancient predecessors had high technology of a type we cannot currently fathom, though likely had to do with crystal or aural tech paths (maybe psychic? Maybe a combination) that allowed them to shape and move enormous stone thousands of kilometers. The megalithic structures of Peru and Egypt (and others) cannot be explained otherwise, unless you wanna throw aliens into the mix.
Fair enough on being condescending, I apologize.
Trust them or not, but Forbes did a piece on how this stuff was moved and where it was quarried from. Based on it, it sounds like the original pyramids fell apart and slowly but surely they figured out what was necessary to make a long standing structure. It just so happened to require all kinds of stone from various places, and they depicted showing how these things were moved.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidbressan/2017/09/28/papyrus-reveals-from-where-the-rocks-used-to-build-the-great-pyramid-came-from/
Cheers.
I've been to Meidum, the partially collapsed pyramid mentioned in the article. What they don't mention is that it and the mastabas are built on much, much, MUCH older megalithic structures underneath. I've also been to quarry in Aswan and it has this mind-bogglingly gigantic 1400 ton half-excavated granite obelisk with what seems like large scoop marks where it was being dug out. The official timeline and expalantions are full of these inconsistencies that don't hold up to scrutiny once you start looking.
If you're curious and don't mind longhand research videos, UnchartedX on YouTube does a phenomenal job of delving into these topics of ancient history/tech in Egypt and Peru. Nothing beats seeing these first-hand, though.
There are more than just mixing cement. Many Egypt artifacts are made of granite or harder stone.
Cool, we're talking about the pyramids right now though.
There are quite some large granite boxes in the pyramid which can’t be explained how they were placed in there.
Cool, there are plenty of interior stones in the payramids that are granite. Cool.
So simple you say yet they couldn't be re-created today
Recreated? By who? Who's trying to recreate the pyramids? No one is recreating them, but people have learned how it was done.
"We have discovered through archaeological digs, the tools used to build these structures, and how these tools were utilized to accomplish this task. The tools used by the Egyptians were very simple and consisted primarily of two devices. The first being a right angle rod marked along its length with increments denoting cubits. A hole was drilled on one end, where a plumb line would have attached, and the second tool was an unmarked rod with a hole at one end.
The idea behind this was first for one worker to look through the hole of the unmarked rod, and sight both the plumb line (which was held by a second worker) and a specified star. Then according to the foundation ceremonies, the worker would then face towards Ursa Major, and search for the polar star (which back then was Thuban located in the constellation of Draco). Once this star was located the worker then marked a line running from north to south coinciding with the notched increments of the other rod, pretty easy huh. This simple method was utilized to layout the foundations of every structure that adorns the landscape of Egypt."
And that's not even getting into the math portion of the article itself, just the device they used to layout the foundation.
http://www.actforlibraries.org/how-the-egyptians-used-mathmatics-to-build-the-pyramids/
Is this the thing about the Pyramids being made out of concrete and poured in situ?
If so, fascinating!
They're still trying anything to justify their narrative away from the truth.
Egyptians did not make the pyramids, they inherited them.
If you would like to do this the simple way... Go to an auto parts store and buy some Blue Devil headgasket repair. It's actualy "water glass" or silica desolved in water and lye. mix it with sand in a mold so it's wet. When exposed to CO2 it will turn into a rock.
They forgot about UFO power
The simplest, least problematic explanation is usually the right one.
This is excepting busy rich folks who are evil, wicked, mean, bad, and nasty. There is no explanation for them.
It really lends credibility when there's a typo in the title. <rolleyes>
/s
UFO's or a greater civilisation that has been wiped from our memories. The Egyptians of a few thousand years ago tried to re-create the pyramids along the Nile river and most of them have collapsed or degraded
The mathematical precision was not achievable considering how primitive they were.
That is why you have to accept the history they teach is wrong, these HUMANS where more advanced than its taught... no they were not aliens.
Agree. More and more evidence showing what we call "primitive" to be survivors of the cataclysm that dethroned a once prospering civilization.
They had no modern tools but they must have been way more intelligent since they lived closer to the Fall than we do. Entropy.
The water erosion and how deep the sphinx was buried point at at least 100k years prior to the pharaoh.