At the house where the Satanists were planning their ceremony, the security wasn't all that strong:
"They knew that their fellow citizens, in this brave new century, chose to be unaware of them, to consign their master and them to the realm of myth. No one would come looking for them because no one believed in their existence."
When Odd Thomas spies on the Satanists gathering, he sees "a well-known film actor, a United States senator, and a couple other faces that were familiar but that I couldn't identify."
"...they were protected by their master, the rebel angel who was the prince of this world, to whom they had pledged everything. He said that they were untouchable. And perhaps they trusted one another not to steal and not to betray them with video on the Internet because when they had joined the dark-siders, they had surrendered their free will and no longer had the capacity to change their minds and betray the cult. A satanic society, after all, would operate as the ultimate totalitarianism."
Not that this story has anything to do with real life. Nah!
If you are intrigued, happy reading!
Dean Koontz has more than one coincidental passage in his books. From the 1981 novel "The Eyes of Darkness":
(image link)
https://images.news18.com/ibnlive/uploads/2020/02/Untitled-design-211.jpg
WOW.
That's a YUGE wow! Guess Koontz was trying to tell us! 💥
Or he just gets kicks writing truth and making it look like fiction to condition us. Either or.
Yeah. It's hard to know for sure. It's like netflix. A LOT of great educational content under the guise of "Fiction"...
Not really sure either because I never read that genre.
When I see things like this, it only confirms the idea that Carlin said about being a big club and you ain't in it. I think there are so many people that are "above" the level of everyone else that are in the know. Take what Gaddafi said to the UN about a virus and selling the vaccines. Aaron Russo was told about 9/11 by Nick Rockefeller. Boris Johnsons dad wrote about a virus called covid. I think a lot of these people are told what is going to happen as a way to pull them into the group. There are far too many "coincidences" which show up as the storyline for books, movies, and music. And before anyone says "predictive programming", I believe this is something beyond that. The people that let loose the "coincidental" things, do so not b/c they were told to, but simply b/c the idea is too good to sit on and they couldn't keep their mouth shut.
If you have done any kind of investigating/researching the topics Q has covered, you start to see that more people are pulled into cabal/nwo than born into it. You see how people are coerced, blackmailed, brainwashed, threatened, and so forth. But the vast majority of them aren't bright enough to not repeat something so juicy, so it comes out in films, books, and song, which they claim as their own unique ideas. The concepts are so outlandish that they are applauded for coming up with something so original, yet they are either parroting what they heard or changing the names/places as not to divulge too much.
Remember, we're talking about people who concocted a plan so vast and secret that people would not believe it if they heard it.
Once I realized how much I thought was true was a verifiable lie, it lead to questioning just how big the lie really is. The rabbit hole goes deep and the signs are everywhere. We're talking about falsehoods that have been propagated for generations, which leads to reality itself being questioned. I find this to be an equally terrifying and exciting thought.
Some of what we find is pattern and some is coincidence. I think most of us here exist in that space, questioning everything because the lies are impossible to ignore now, and moving on without the truth isn't an option.
The "club" is real and humanity has to confront and destroy it. The only way forward is truth.
"Moving on without the truth isn't an option." Well said.
Well said! 👏 Hunter_Slaptop
Bingo Choctaw!
Came to say this updoot
Looks like that is on page 333
Hardcover and paperback will be different.
On my reading list pronto.
If you haven't read his work, you are in for a treat. Based, loves dogs, tells a very imaginative story - but unlike Stephen King, there is no diarrhea of the typewriter. By this, I mean that King would spend 20 pages describing some trees outside a house, that have absolutely nothing to do with the story. You could easily trim ~50% of the pages from almost any King novel, and never come close to touching either the plot, or anything essential to the characters.
Dean does a masterful job, of keeping you entertained, developing each character, describing the scene, and presenting the story in a manner that it's often a difficult book to put down. When I have a long flight, or am in the mood for a thriller, he's one of my favorites. I would compare his style to Michael Crichton, but more on the light side. Where Crichton would provide an appendix listing various facts, court cases, or scientific facts supporting his story; Dean Koontz is more of a "disengage your brain, sit back, get comfortable and be entertained:, kind of author. Enjoy the story. Both are fantastic authors, but Crichton is pretty intense. I personally am just not a fan of Stephen King, politically nor as a reader of his stories. I will acknowledge his creativity and genius; just not my cup of tea as an author. Your mileage may vary, and that's perfectly fine.
I've read everything of his I can get my hands on. Started over 20 years ago..... I cannot believe I m old enough to make a 20 years ago reference. I'm just going to go sit in a corner and cry while I read my James Rollins Sigma series book.
May have to check James Rollins out ... been hitting the "Classics" lately. Arthur C Clark, Heinlein, and Asimov.
Me too!
Stephen King’s “Dr. Strange” has strong adrenochrome themes.
And King always seems to have some demented sex sub-plot as part of his stories.
I totally agree with you about Koontz.
I wasn't surprised to learn Stephen king s deep state...I read his books until they got too dark...koonz was another matter..his stories may have dark topics but are not dark. I read his dad was an alcoholic and his life as a child wasn't good....I think he wrote it all out of him...just read a James Herbert and wished I hadn't...too dark for my taste.