I've been surprised before. I don't even trust "the research", today. In fact, since it does not serve my interests to become GMO for a globalist agenda, the wild-eyed 'conspiracy theories' regarding motive are more useful than the "research": In other words, I'm never going to willingly participate, no matter how harmless "the research" says the current thing is. Whatever I see the globalist enemy ORDERING be done, I'm doing something else.
A "third" DNA strand is not needed. Viruses are already genetically imprinted on our DNA. That DNA is believed to be inactive/active depending on the paper you read.
Making it active, and playing with it, is not beyond the possible.
I WAS going to say this but you beat me to it
By OP's logic, the math doesn't break down till 2024. 2023 still divides out to that number.
You do know that it is not possible to have a third DNA strand, right? It's really basic biology.
It can't work with 3. Please do a little research first. It's embarrassing.
Does anyone know what our real technology level is? Maybe the cabal is in contact with someone else that can help them.
I've been surprised before. I don't even trust "the research", today. In fact, since it does not serve my interests to become GMO for a globalist agenda, the wild-eyed 'conspiracy theories' regarding motive are more useful than the "research": In other words, I'm never going to willingly participate, no matter how harmless "the research" says the current thing is. Whatever I see the globalist enemy ORDERING be done, I'm doing something else.
A "third" DNA strand is not needed. Viruses are already genetically imprinted on our DNA. That DNA is believed to be inactive/active depending on the paper you read.
Making it active, and playing with it, is not beyond the possible.