6pm DURHAM : BOMBSHELL UPDATE🔥
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Her last update: Durham brings up the communications with Charles Dolan. Defense is objecting on basis of hearsay. Judge Trenga asks Durham to rephrase the question.
In relation to Mr. Dolan, Durham directs Mr. Auten to not mention anything about what Steele said.
Auten: "I received some characterizations regarding the sources of the Steele dossier." Steele gave Charles Dolan as a name.
Durham reiterates to Mr. Auten that Danchenko said that he himself was responsible for a sizeable amount of the intel for the Steele dossier: 80% of the raw intelligence and 50% of the analysis. Durham is raising this to infer that there may be a reason Danchenko left out Charles Dolan, as Auten then says Danchenko never brought up Dolan’s name. Durham asks Auten, given Dolan’s connection to Crossfire Hurricane, that if his name had been mentioned, he would remember, right? Auten agrees. Danchenko did not provide records to the FBI regarding himself and Mr. Dolan. Auten says that in January 2017 prior to Danchenko’s FBI interview, the Bureau was only concerned with Dolan on a preliminary investigation level. Following Danchenko’s interview, the Bureau began to dig more extensively during the months of April, May, and June of 2017.
Durham asks if Auten was told about Danchenko’s meeting in Moscow during the January 2017 interview. Auten says yes; however during Durham’s examination it’s revealed that Danchenko did not make any mention of this meeting in Moscow having to do with Dolan. In early October of 2016, Danchenko and Charles Dolan attended a meeting in Moscow together, as well as a separate meeting in Moscow later in June 2017.
Durham: "Did the FBI press Danchenko to disclose any sources regarding the Steele dossier?"
Auten: "Yes, we asked if Danchenko could provide additional sources; Dolan’s name was not brought up."
Durham introduces stipulations regarding a number of government exhibits, including 700, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, etc. which are a number of emails from Mr. Dolan. The stipulation confirms that these emails are trustworthy for sake of review. Note that Charles Dolan worked for KGlobal, a consultant firm. Defense asks judge to approach.
Conversation under seal.
On Friday, August 19, 2016, Danchenko sent an email to [email protected] with the subject: "Kozachev & Prizadio (sp?)"
The email reads text including: "Please ask anyone about Paul Manafort’s resignation and the Trump campaign, off the record of course!"
"I am working on a project against Trump…"
Durham questions if handling agent Helsan saw any of this information that Danchenko had not shared in his January 2017 interview with Auten and Soma. Durham asks: "Were these conversations with Dolan not shared?"
Auten: "Correct."
On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Charles Dolan replies to Danchenko’s email: "Let me dig around on Manafort."
Durham: "Would Mr. Dolan’s response have been relevant?"
Auten: "Yes, it should have been given."
Charles Dolan also sent an email to Danchenko on August 20, 2016, at 10:43 AM that said (paraphrased):
"I had a drink with a GOP friend of mine who has info." Corey Lewandowski, according to Dolan, had "info on Manafort." Dolan included a link to a Politico article all about Paul Manafort.
Returning from a short break, there’s a question from the jury about the slight difference in name listed in the emails they’ve been presented. Some say "Sergei" others say "Sergio." Judge Trenga confirms this is in fact the same person, however he is going to address counsel as to whether the difference in name changes based on familiarity with who is addressing him (formal versus friend, close connection, etc.)
Government Exhibit 713A and B are more emails between Danchenko and Charles Dolan.
On Saturday, August 20, 2016, Danchenko sends a response to Dolan which includes text saying:
"Dear Chuck,
Thank you for this. Any additional [info] will be appreciated. I am following the Trump-Russia trail; it is there . . . [it is] an important project for me.
Cheers,
Danchenko"
Durham: "Did Danchenko indicate work he was doing for Christopher Steele was important?"
Auten: "He just said he was busy with it."
Durham: "Wouldn’t it have been helpful to know that Igor Danchenko and Charles Dolan’s goals were the same working on the same projects?"
Defense: "Objection!"
Judge Trenga: "Rephrase."
Durham: "Wouldn’t it be important to know that Danchenko’s goals coincided with Dolan’s?"
Auten: "Yes."
Durham: "Could you determine whether or not Dolan had a partisan persuasion?"
Auten: "Yes, Democrat. . . He worked for various aspects of the DNC over the years going a while back."
Durham: "Wouldn’t this information be valuable for you to know that Danchenko’s goals coincided with Dolan’s?"
Auten: "For corroborating the Steele report, yes."
https://t.me/THEREALTORIABROOKE
ah crap telegram... thanks tho I was just searching "Justice league looking for the rest of the write up...washopingvthat there was a website like legal insurrection where you could follow the case. telegram always fucks my shit up...
ooohhh I just found the dim little gray "Preview Channel" option..... much better now!
shit always gets 'deleted' These criminals have 'deleted' so much crap, Im surprised the entire internet isnt gone by now
Doesn’t the NSA collect everything for reference in their little Utah black building?
I'm sure they only use that if a grandma wonders into the capitol rotunda.
Ah. My mistake.
They can only use it for acts of terrorism ...
Interesting tidbit ... do you remember when the female FBI agent in 2019 labeled the El Paso shooting an act of terrorism? We'd never seen her before ... she seemed to be a white hat. If that shooting was an act of terrorism ... the NSA was able to drill down on all communications of that kid's parents. Many believe that's where everything unfurled for the Deep State.
That's just the cover.
Bluffdale is the center of operations for a quantum AI.
They dont understand low-level formatting, just hammers and sheet.
Don't worry. If you need to find it, you will. Electronics, nothing gets deleted. Even if you delete it, unless you overwrite everything, it's still there.
My concern is that the statue of limitations is running out soon, Either indictments start coming down on all of them ASAP, or now. Or we will just be left with a report from Durham. Big Deal! Everyone will know the truth but no one gets prosecuted. I am weary at this point.
FISA is only the start. And we go in baby steps, slowly, to make sure people see and understand. We only get one shot at taking down the corrupt system, and it has has to be done properly and at the right time. It might be painful, but it's the only way to get to the big players. And statute of limitations doesn't run out if there are active investigations going on.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3287
Might read that before worrying about the SOL
I understand how you feel, however, keep in mind that the statue of limitations is on bringing charges. So everyone can be charged at the last minute and still be prosecuted after the statue of limitations is up, and I believe that sealed indictments can conceal criminal charges.
Thank you for your valuable information, I just so badly want to make sure that justice is done.
For what big crimes do limitations not exist?
At this point it is hard to disagree with that point of view. There is no reason that others could not be indicted by now. Doesn’t have to be Comey or Clinton or someone that high profile. But the 2 lovebirds ought to be facing a trial date by now. Ohr, Brennan, and Clapper ought to be indicted by now.
You can’t tell me that these trials are necessary to indict the other guys. Perhaps these trials are necessary before the other trials. But why not have some extra indictments come down late this summer?
Pure cope take: Durham can’t risk further indictments screwing up his easy mode chance of getting all of this on the record testimony at trial. Because giving the illusion no more are coming makes forthright testimony at a low stakes trial more likely. Or other shenanigans that render these witnesses magically “unavailable.”
How do you know they aren’t? Danchenko’s indictment was likely sealed long before we knew anything about it
interesting that the defense tried to get evidence about DJt, Flynn etc into the record and got shut down.... Just a poor attempt to make a trick out of Durhams long game strategy
came out of the Danchenko trial
Whatever......
Will be a NOTHING BURGER....
Indeed. And we can infer from the Q drops that Durham will likely make little progress. There's another card to play and we don't know what that card is. Durham is far too high profile to be a "stealth bomber".
Not dooming, I just don't want people to be demoralized if/when Durham's investigation yields little justice.
Noice. Thanks for the update.
Thanks, Tupac.
I must say the hopium is in the air again. Not really sure why but i can smell it.
Enjoy tHe sHow fOlks ; )
Thanks for the write up.
They all need hanged. They are evil.