I never once saw any mention of Tulsi saying she is joining MAGA. So I am not even sure why these discussions keep popping up. It might be relevant in future, but right now totally doesn't make sense.
IMHO, Tulsi Gabbard is opposite of MAGA. She represents the ideology from the CFR to the letter. There should be no surprise that Gabbard is a CFR member.
I agree with you that "it might be relevant in the future". It seems many people here on GAW are posting quite a bit concerning Tulsi Gabbard. The Mockingbird News sure seems to be infatuated with Tulsi Gabbard right now. To me, the build-up always of a MSM narrative seems to lead to 'some' kinetic consequence later on. Would you not agree the likes of Tucker Carlson and the Fake News is busy building this Trojan horse though?
Prior to 2013, Tulsi Gabbard was being paraded all over on the media talk circuit similar to as she is now. It culminated in her being voted overwhelmingly as the vice chair of the DNC. All of this was to build her resume and exposure in front of the American public and eventually position her to run for president. However, Tulsi Gabbard made the mistake of crossing-the-line when she criticized chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and that queen witch, Hillary Clinton during the presidential primary. Gabbard almost mistakenly opened a can of worms for the Clinton machine and the DNC. So bad was her offense that Tulsi Gabbard resigned her DNC vice chair position in 2016. A cat-fight ensued to which Gabbard released a statement about the heated and public disagreements surrounding the debates in a Facebook post in 2015. Who says Tulsi Gabbard never gets angry? Her persona is well crafted and all an act. Following her public criticisms, Gabbard was reported to have been either "disinvited" or asked to "consider not coming" to the October 13, 2015, Democratic debate in Las Vegas. She fell from grace and was shunned by the democrats.
It appears Tulsi Gabbard has become tired of being ostracized by her fellow democrats. This is after voting pretty much in lock-step with the democrats for many years hoping to be forgiven. She has now decided to take a page from Senator Joe Manchin and copy the same act as Manchin did only a few months ago. Remember when Manchin was going to leave the democrat party? The hype Tulsi Gabbard is now getting from the MSM is far different than what Joe Manchin got. Why do you suppose that is?
It appears to me that Tulsi Gabbard is useful after all in a different way than Senator Joe Manchin is. Already the Daily Mail in the UK is reporting that Tulsi Gabbard has taken 3rd place in the republican polls as the favorite candidate. WTH? Whether The Daily Mail piece is true or not is collateral to the evidence Gabbard is indeed being hyped. Mike Pence was originally the Deep State's favorite, but then Ron DeSantis started to really make a name for himself with Republicans. Now, it appears the Deep State is conjuring up another candidate they hope the Republicans, Independents,and 'walk-away' democrats will all support. And look who Tulsi Gabbard just endorsed a MAGA candidate.
The implications of the Deep State 'creating' her as the 'safe' choice between the much maligned "all too dangerous-to-our-democracy" MAGA candidate (Ergo, Donald Trump) and the all too woke left candidate (ergo, Joe Biden/ Kamala Harris) is IMHO, something to contemplate and be aware of. I'm betting Tulsi Gabbard is going to run for president. She did it before. She won't run as a republican, but most likely as a democrat. She herself said she is now an "independent" democrat. That wording sounds like what Senator Joe Manchin said. How much this will work is something that might be [very] relevant in future.
We cannot under estimate the power of someone like Tulsi to be able to redpill a lot of people on the left and on the fence. Remember, they will close their ears and scream "lalalala" if someone who is fully conservative talks to them.
What defines Tulsi is whether she will "evolve" as she redpills people. Start with Ukraine. Once she has enough people on left listening to her, drop a crumb about abortion or gun control. Prep the people to be open to alternate views in what they consider absolutely uncompromisable issues.
On the other hand, if she starts getting a large MAGA following (highly unlikely) and then she starts hinting CBDC is good etc, then we know she is working for the clowns.
NCSWIC does not mean we have "already won". It just means nothing can stop what is coming, and includes some very extremely painful days ahead, before the world can wake up from the matrix.
When and only when all the people wake up (less 4-6% ofc) can we say the Good has won over Evil. Its never been "us" against the "rest". Its always the good against evil. The rest us part of us, just havent woken up yet.
It's like putting a smelly piece of shit in a Candy wrapper and trying to convince someone its the real deal. There's plenty of evidence that Tulsi Gabbard is a flip-flopper too.
Never forget Tulsi Gabbard is a Council on Foreign Affairs (CFR) member to this day. Her past voting record and policy mirror the CFR agenda. Ya' can't get any clearer than that on 'who' she is. If your premise is correct, there's very little evidence so far for it to be rationally discerned. Unfortunately, the preponderance of evidence is not been on your side. Tulsi Gabbard voted twice to impeach Donald Trump. Gabbard has endorsed one America First candidate. Even the devil himself is capable of doing good acts, but they are designed to get us to believe in him to lead us astray. Yes, it is possible people can change. However, history teaches us that power and wealth have a compelling effect on individuals. The bible tells us that the righteous kings were far and few compared to evil ones.
Prior to 2015, she was being groomed for being a candidate for president then. Gabbard was paraded on all the TV networks and the media gushed and fawned all over this fast rising democrat. She was "smart" and "savy". On top of this she was an Iraqi military veteran. The media played her up to having all the cards to lead the democrats. She was told all of these things and was prodded to run for the vice chair of the DNC, to which she did run and was unanimously elected as vice chair. All was looking really good for Tulsi Gabbard and they told her she was going to be president someday. The MSM had built her up to be the next star of the democrat party. Then she made a big mistake. Her self-interest and ego got in the way and she crossing-the-line with the DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and that queen witch, Hillary Clinton when she criticized them for not doing more debates during the presidential primary. Gabbard nearly opened a can of worms for the Clinton machine and the DNC. Hillary was having health issues and it was to remain hidden. So bad was Tulsio Gabbart's offense that she was forced to resign from the DNC vice chair position in 2016. A cat-fight ensued to which Gabbard released a statement about the heated and public disagreements surrounding the debates in a Facebook post in 2015. Who says Tulsi Gabbard never gets angry? On top of this, perhaps out of spite she supported Bernie Sanders.
Her persona is well crafted and is really all an act, just as Mike Pence vocalizes.. Following her public criticisms, Gabbard was reported to have been either "disinvited" or asked to "consider not coming" to the October 13, 2015, Democratic debate in Las Vegas. She fell from grace and was shunned by the democrats.
It appears Tulsi Gabbard has become displeased with being ostracized by her fellow democrats. This is after voting pretty much in lock-step with the democrats for 6 straight years hoping to be forgiven. Enough is enough. She has now decided to take a page from Senator Joe Manchin and copy the same act as Manchin did only a few months ago. Remember when Manchin was going to leave the democrat party? The hype Tulsi Gabbard is now getting from the MSM is far different than what Joe Manchin got. Why do you suppose that is?
It appears to me that Tulsi Gabbard is useful after all in a different way than Senator Joe Manchin is. Already the Daily Mail in the UK is reporting that Tulsi Gabbard has taken 3rd place in the republican polls as the favorite candidate. WTH? Whether The Daily Mail piece is true or not is collateral to the evidence Gabbard is indeed being hyped. Mike Pence was originally the Deep State's favorite, but then Ron DeSantis started to really make a name for himself with Republicans. Now, it appears the Deep State is conjuring up another candidate they hope the Republicans, Independents,and 'walk-away' democrats will all support. And look who Tulsi Gabbard just endorsed a MAGA candidate.
The implications of the Deep State 'creating' her as the 'safe' choice between the much maligned "all too dangerous-to-our-democracy" MAGA candidate (Ergo, Donald Trump) and the all too woke left candidate (ergo, Joe Biden/ Kamala Harris) is IMHO, something to contemplate and be aware of. I'm betting Tulsi Gabbard is going to run for president. She did it before. She won't run as a republican, but most likely as a democrat. She herself said she is now an "independent" democrat. That wording sounds like what Senator Joe Manchin said. How much this will work is anyone's guess.
Tucker is a showman. He has to have something to show that people will watch and which won't alienate too many for too long.That has no relevance to his own feelings. Even his interactions with his interviewees are not necessarily valid clues to what he really thinks, and the same is true of all these talking heads. Imagine trying to dig up some new material daily and not look too partisan. It's much more informative imo to watch the guests.
The third party spoiler. Don't think it will work.
I like your question. The why seems obvious. 'They' are hoping we are 'still' clueless or are 'awake' enough to care.
I never once saw any mention of Tulsi saying she is joining MAGA. So I am not even sure why these discussions keep popping up. It might be relevant in future, but right now totally doesn't make sense.
IMHO, Tulsi Gabbard is opposite of MAGA. She represents the ideology from the CFR to the letter. There should be no surprise that Gabbard is a CFR member.
I agree with you that "it might be relevant in the future". It seems many people here on GAW are posting quite a bit concerning Tulsi Gabbard. The Mockingbird News sure seems to be infatuated with Tulsi Gabbard right now. To me, the build-up always of a MSM narrative seems to lead to 'some' kinetic consequence later on. Would you not agree the likes of Tucker Carlson and the Fake News is busy building this Trojan horse though?
Prior to 2013, Tulsi Gabbard was being paraded all over on the media talk circuit similar to as she is now. It culminated in her being voted overwhelmingly as the vice chair of the DNC. All of this was to build her resume and exposure in front of the American public and eventually position her to run for president. However, Tulsi Gabbard made the mistake of crossing-the-line when she criticized chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and that queen witch, Hillary Clinton during the presidential primary. Gabbard almost mistakenly opened a can of worms for the Clinton machine and the DNC. So bad was her offense that Tulsi Gabbard resigned her DNC vice chair position in 2016. A cat-fight ensued to which Gabbard released a statement about the heated and public disagreements surrounding the debates in a Facebook post in 2015. Who says Tulsi Gabbard never gets angry? Her persona is well crafted and all an act. Following her public criticisms, Gabbard was reported to have been either "disinvited" or asked to "consider not coming" to the October 13, 2015, Democratic debate in Las Vegas. She fell from grace and was shunned by the democrats.
It appears Tulsi Gabbard has become tired of being ostracized by her fellow democrats. This is after voting pretty much in lock-step with the democrats for many years hoping to be forgiven. She has now decided to take a page from Senator Joe Manchin and copy the same act as Manchin did only a few months ago. Remember when Manchin was going to leave the democrat party? The hype Tulsi Gabbard is now getting from the MSM is far different than what Joe Manchin got. Why do you suppose that is?
It appears to me that Tulsi Gabbard is useful after all in a different way than Senator Joe Manchin is. Already the Daily Mail in the UK is reporting that Tulsi Gabbard has taken 3rd place in the republican polls as the favorite candidate. WTH? Whether The Daily Mail piece is true or not is collateral to the evidence Gabbard is indeed being hyped. Mike Pence was originally the Deep State's favorite, but then Ron DeSantis started to really make a name for himself with Republicans. Now, it appears the Deep State is conjuring up another candidate they hope the Republicans, Independents,and 'walk-away' democrats will all support. And look who Tulsi Gabbard just endorsed a MAGA candidate.
The implications of the Deep State 'creating' her as the 'safe' choice between the much maligned "all too dangerous-to-our-democracy" MAGA candidate (Ergo, Donald Trump) and the all too woke left candidate (ergo, Joe Biden/ Kamala Harris) is IMHO, something to contemplate and be aware of. I'm betting Tulsi Gabbard is going to run for president. She did it before. She won't run as a republican, but most likely as a democrat. She herself said she is now an "independent" democrat. That wording sounds like what Senator Joe Manchin said. How much this will work is something that might be [very] relevant in future.
We cannot under estimate the power of someone like Tulsi to be able to redpill a lot of people on the left and on the fence. Remember, they will close their ears and scream "lalalala" if someone who is fully conservative talks to them.
What defines Tulsi is whether she will "evolve" as she redpills people. Start with Ukraine. Once she has enough people on left listening to her, drop a crumb about abortion or gun control. Prep the people to be open to alternate views in what they consider absolutely uncompromisable issues.
On the other hand, if she starts getting a large MAGA following (highly unlikely) and then she starts hinting CBDC is good etc, then we know she is working for the clowns.
How can they do that if we've already won?
NCSWIC does not mean we have "already won". It just means nothing can stop what is coming, and includes some very extremely painful days ahead, before the world can wake up from the matrix.
When and only when all the people wake up (less 4-6% ofc) can we say the Good has won over Evil. Its never been "us" against the "rest". Its always the good against evil. The rest us part of us, just havent woken up yet.
Plenty of people across GAW have claimed we already won.
Then ask them what they mean, and understand their perspectives, and then you might even start getting some value from this board!
How can she be 40 something years old and go from Bernie Sanders & Antifa to MAGA in a few years? Makes zero sense
It's like putting a smelly piece of shit in a Candy wrapper and trying to convince someone its the real deal. There's plenty of evidence that Tulsi Gabbard is a flip-flopper too.
I believe she is endorsing America First candidates, and her role is to lead democrats to do the same.
Never forget Tulsi Gabbard is a Council on Foreign Affairs (CFR) member to this day. Her past voting record and policy mirror the CFR agenda. Ya' can't get any clearer than that on 'who' she is. If your premise is correct, there's very little evidence so far for it to be rationally discerned. Unfortunately, the preponderance of evidence is not been on your side. Tulsi Gabbard voted twice to impeach Donald Trump. Gabbard has endorsed one America First candidate. Even the devil himself is capable of doing good acts, but they are designed to get us to believe in him to lead us astray. Yes, it is possible people can change. However, history teaches us that power and wealth have a compelling effect on individuals. The bible tells us that the righteous kings were far and few compared to evil ones.
Prior to 2015, she was being groomed for being a candidate for president then. Gabbard was paraded on all the TV networks and the media gushed and fawned all over this fast rising democrat. She was "smart" and "savy". On top of this she was an Iraqi military veteran. The media played her up to having all the cards to lead the democrats. She was told all of these things and was prodded to run for the vice chair of the DNC, to which she did run and was unanimously elected as vice chair. All was looking really good for Tulsi Gabbard and they told her she was going to be president someday. The MSM had built her up to be the next star of the democrat party. Then she made a big mistake. Her self-interest and ego got in the way and she crossing-the-line with the DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and that queen witch, Hillary Clinton when she criticized them for not doing more debates during the presidential primary. Gabbard nearly opened a can of worms for the Clinton machine and the DNC. Hillary was having health issues and it was to remain hidden. So bad was Tulsio Gabbart's offense that she was forced to resign from the DNC vice chair position in 2016. A cat-fight ensued to which Gabbard released a statement about the heated and public disagreements surrounding the debates in a Facebook post in 2015. Who says Tulsi Gabbard never gets angry? On top of this, perhaps out of spite she supported Bernie Sanders.
Her persona is well crafted and is really all an act, just as Mike Pence vocalizes.. Following her public criticisms, Gabbard was reported to have been either "disinvited" or asked to "consider not coming" to the October 13, 2015, Democratic debate in Las Vegas. She fell from grace and was shunned by the democrats.
It appears Tulsi Gabbard has become displeased with being ostracized by her fellow democrats. This is after voting pretty much in lock-step with the democrats for 6 straight years hoping to be forgiven. Enough is enough. She has now decided to take a page from Senator Joe Manchin and copy the same act as Manchin did only a few months ago. Remember when Manchin was going to leave the democrat party? The hype Tulsi Gabbard is now getting from the MSM is far different than what Joe Manchin got. Why do you suppose that is?
It appears to me that Tulsi Gabbard is useful after all in a different way than Senator Joe Manchin is. Already the Daily Mail in the UK is reporting that Tulsi Gabbard has taken 3rd place in the republican polls as the favorite candidate. WTH? Whether The Daily Mail piece is true or not is collateral to the evidence Gabbard is indeed being hyped. Mike Pence was originally the Deep State's favorite, but then Ron DeSantis started to really make a name for himself with Republicans. Now, it appears the Deep State is conjuring up another candidate they hope the Republicans, Independents,and 'walk-away' democrats will all support. And look who Tulsi Gabbard just endorsed a MAGA candidate.
The implications of the Deep State 'creating' her as the 'safe' choice between the much maligned "all too dangerous-to-our-democracy" MAGA candidate (Ergo, Donald Trump) and the all too woke left candidate (ergo, Joe Biden/ Kamala Harris) is IMHO, something to contemplate and be aware of. I'm betting Tulsi Gabbard is going to run for president. She did it before. She won't run as a republican, but most likely as a democrat. She herself said she is now an "independent" democrat. That wording sounds like what Senator Joe Manchin said. How much this will work is anyone's guess.
Tucker is a showman. He has to have something to show that people will watch and which won't alienate too many for too long.That has no relevance to his own feelings. Even his interactions with his interviewees are not necessarily valid clues to what he really thinks, and the same is true of all these talking heads. Imagine trying to dig up some new material daily and not look too partisan. It's much more informative imo to watch the guests.