Just because someone has a patent, does not mean that the thing patented has been reduced to practice. I have 9 patents, and none of them have been built (though I think they could be). Salvatore Pais has a lot to prove, and a patent is not proof of anything. It's not even evidence. At best, it is a property claim and/or an argument.
It would only give you funding. It wouldn't make R&D easier (look at the history of the controlled fusion program). And even if the principle had been demonstrated by prototype examples, the idea can be quashed for other reasons (e.g., the Orion pulse propulsion concept).
I was once working with a team that was getting ready to build megawatt-class carbon monoxide electric discharge lasers (COEDLs) for weapon systems. We were in competition with Northrop. But that whole technology was bypassed when the Air Force decided to develop the chemical oxygen-iodine laser (COIL). So, you never know what the fate of an idea will be.
There is a mental process on this page that tends to go in the direction of: "It's conceivable" => "it's possible" => "it's probable" => "it's in development" => "it's a secret weapon!" When the real answer is: bumpkis. Be skeptical of super technology being touted. The stuff that is talked about is unlikely. The stuff that is likely is not talked about.
Since I was read into SCI programs that had access to tech you could only dream of, I think you are speaking out of your depth. What is this? The sauceless critic who wants to lord it over the chef?
This idea that "because I can't prove it, there must be fantastic super-weapons being held in secret" is pure delusion. Get over it.
Your dad was in Nagasaki so you know all about nuclear, you worked for Boeing for over 40 years, the media doesn't lie much at all, and we can trust 99% of science and history.
We've discovered all the above "facts" about you because you used them to establish credibility on why you are right and anons are wrong. This is what larpers do.
And Q confirmed Epstein was the first arrest, so of course you post nonsense like this in an attempt to derail actual news-
I have been forthright and honest. All you are doing is sniping. And misquoting what I say. Of course the media lies incessantly; I haven't bothered to read newspapers for the past 40 years on account of that. But other information is reliable. History requires a lot of reading, and science a lot of learning.
You don't know squat about me. I surmise it is a frustration to you. But I have offered information that is correct and comes out of my area of competence. Some anons are wrong because they have indulged their own fantasies to the exclusion of realism. I have pointed out their errors and lapses. I don't expect that would make them happy with me. Too bad. Live and learn.
As for Epstein, his arrest was satisfactory, so far as it went, but allowing him to be murdered was not satisfactory. And, in general, the whole affair was a nothingburger. I was aware of who and what he was, but, frankly, I am not impressed with anything that was accomplished. If he was the "first arrest," was that disinformation? Can you deny that arresting Trump would get the world's attention? Don't place too much weight on a speculation, presented as such. Anons do that too much with speculations, as a basic reflex.
I am live-action. But I am not role-playing (this is the real me) and I don't take the fate of the nation as a game. So, I will agree I am a "la" but no different than you or any other anon.
No, but they were put forward by the Boeing Company and vetted by their patent staff. It may occur to you that a company like Boeing does not bother with pursuit of patents if they think they have no potential business value.
The patents could be signed by anyone. It wouldn't change the facts of what I said.
There’s some really interesting information on how a general(?) stepped into the patent process to verify to the patent office that, yes, is fact, this patent was fully functional.
I don’t have a link for that at the moment, but could possibly find it this afternoon and report back.
Unfortunately, we live in times where creatures like Rachel Levine are accepted as women and allowed to wear a uniform, so the say-so of a ranking officer might be of interest, but only because of throwing rank around.
My skepticism is also based in the fact that a patent is a public disclosure. If so, where is the scientific evidence? No reason to keep public information secret.
Rachel Levine,,, oh hell I haven’t thought about that freak show in awhile..
I pretty much think she was purposely put there as part of the show. Im thinking that freak was told she will be taking that position by white hats and she better keep that worn out mouth shut or she’ll find herself in Club Gitmo for the rest of “her(?)” weird life.
Just because someone has a patent, does not mean that the thing patented has been reduced to practice. I have 9 patents, and none of them have been built (though I think they could be). Salvatore Pais has a lot to prove, and a patent is not proof of anything. It's not even evidence. At best, it is a property claim and/or an argument.
Perhaps, but he has the pocketbook of the US Space Force behind him, do you? Having that kind of funding would certainly make R&D that much easier.
It would only give you funding. It wouldn't make R&D easier (look at the history of the controlled fusion program). And even if the principle had been demonstrated by prototype examples, the idea can be quashed for other reasons (e.g., the Orion pulse propulsion concept).
I was once working with a team that was getting ready to build megawatt-class carbon monoxide electric discharge lasers (COEDLs) for weapon systems. We were in competition with Northrop. But that whole technology was bypassed when the Air Force decided to develop the chemical oxygen-iodine laser (COIL). So, you never know what the fate of an idea will be.
There is a mental process on this page that tends to go in the direction of: "It's conceivable" => "it's possible" => "it's probable" => "it's in development" => "it's a secret weapon!" When the real answer is: bumpkis. Be skeptical of super technology being touted. The stuff that is talked about is unlikely. The stuff that is likely is not talked about.
No offense, but if you don't think there were SCI programs way above you that had access to tech you could only dream of, then you are naive.
Since I was read into SCI programs that had access to tech you could only dream of, I think you are speaking out of your depth. What is this? The sauceless critic who wants to lord it over the chef?
This idea that "because I can't prove it, there must be fantastic super-weapons being held in secret" is pure delusion. Get over it.
You're also a larper and forum slider with no patents on that, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.
Well, I'm not a larper. You can also call me a zebra, and it would also be not true.
And I'm not a forum slider---unless someone is masquerading as me. Have you seen me elsewhere? I would be curious to know.
Your dad was in Nagasaki so you know all about nuclear, you worked for Boeing for over 40 years, the media doesn't lie much at all, and we can trust 99% of science and history.
We've discovered all the above "facts" about you because you used them to establish credibility on why you are right and anons are wrong. This is what larpers do.
And Q confirmed Epstein was the first arrest, so of course you post nonsense like this in an attempt to derail actual news-
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTtuDLSZ/and-ladies-and-gentlemen-the-fir/
I have been forthright and honest. All you are doing is sniping. And misquoting what I say. Of course the media lies incessantly; I haven't bothered to read newspapers for the past 40 years on account of that. But other information is reliable. History requires a lot of reading, and science a lot of learning.
You don't know squat about me. I surmise it is a frustration to you. But I have offered information that is correct and comes out of my area of competence. Some anons are wrong because they have indulged their own fantasies to the exclusion of realism. I have pointed out their errors and lapses. I don't expect that would make them happy with me. Too bad. Live and learn.
As for Epstein, his arrest was satisfactory, so far as it went, but allowing him to be murdered was not satisfactory. And, in general, the whole affair was a nothingburger. I was aware of who and what he was, but, frankly, I am not impressed with anything that was accomplished. If he was the "first arrest," was that disinformation? Can you deny that arresting Trump would get the world's attention? Don't place too much weight on a speculation, presented as such. Anons do that too much with speculations, as a basic reflex.
I am live-action. But I am not role-playing (this is the real me) and I don't take the fate of the nation as a game. So, I will agree I am a "la" but no different than you or any other anon.
Your patents aren't co-signed by the secretary of the navy
No, but they were put forward by the Boeing Company and vetted by their patent staff. It may occur to you that a company like Boeing does not bother with pursuit of patents if they think they have no potential business value.
The patents could be signed by anyone. It wouldn't change the facts of what I said.
There’s some really interesting information on how a general(?) stepped into the patent process to verify to the patent office that, yes, is fact, this patent was fully functional. I don’t have a link for that at the moment, but could possibly find it this afternoon and report back.
Unfortunately, we live in times where creatures like Rachel Levine are accepted as women and allowed to wear a uniform, so the say-so of a ranking officer might be of interest, but only because of throwing rank around.
My skepticism is also based in the fact that a patent is a public disclosure. If so, where is the scientific evidence? No reason to keep public information secret.
Rachel Levine,,, oh hell I haven’t thought about that freak show in awhile..
I pretty much think she was purposely put there as part of the show. Im thinking that freak was told she will be taking that position by white hats and she better keep that worn out mouth shut or she’ll find herself in Club Gitmo for the rest of “her(?)” weird life.