I wonder if the WEF weaponised perception by just putting up pictures and “claiming” people as members Willy milly. Up until recently politicos etc wouldn’t have pushed back as they’d have just taken the association to add clout to their resume. Maybe the WEF used it as a strategy to gain clout by claiming anyone who was someone was involved to lend credibility to their shenanigans? I know one British MP who explicitly denied membership and said they put his pic up there after he had 1 brief meeting with them at parliament? If we maintain scepticism with anything and everything including who the WEF claims as members unless there’s evidence to corroborate one way or the other it won’t do us a disservice.
Hah. Not to be the resident degenerate nerd, but for some reason your post made me make a mental connection to a secret society in a very recent anime called Lycoris Recoil.
The secret global organization (known as the Alan Institute) picks out exceptional individuals, such as actors, idols, performers, those who have exceptional hearing or exceptional reflexes that make them exceptionally good at killing.
Their marker that the talented receive is an owl pendant. This marks them as a product of the Alan Institute with exceptional talent in a specific field.
The main character was saved as a little girl with a mechanical heart transplant because of her incredible ability to read the actions of someone and the angle of the barrel of their gun, and the reflexes that she has to seemingly dodge bullets (though, she just moves before they fire).
She was saved because they viewed her as being the most talented killer with an unrivaled talent for killing. But she spent her life helping people and using nonlethal rounds, refusing to kill anyone because she felt like she was given a chance to live and do good. Which ultimately angers the institute and causes them to try and kill her.
The owl imagery, secret society global organization with its fangs in every aspect of life through talented individuals, and your post pointing out that no one is loyal and it's about what they can get struck a chord and reminded me of this.
If I had a tinfoil hat, I'd throw it on and call it soft disclosure, thinking back to it. It's wrapped with a couple of "woke" seeming layers, but that organization is distinctly the bad guys.
Interesting, decodingsymbols made the connection that "Alan" "Allen" etc is code for MK programmer. As in Allen Wrenches to adjust the screws. "Having a screw loose".
I can consider it, but the implications of that being a code means Paul Allen (Microsoft) and Woody Allen were somehow related to MK, which I can believe that, but I can't talk to normies about that shit. Every time I try to explain coded news to someone, I can feel the judgement and discomfort and talking about Allen being a code for "having a screw loose" and needing to fix the MK programming is like explaining DUMBs. You're going to get insulted in very predictable ways for explaining certain things to normies.
Yes, you can't talk about symbolic comms to people who have no clue about them. You'll come across as schizophrenic and it's by design.
They'll think you're getting your crazy ideas from the movies and television shows and extrapolating them on the real world.
You're much better off to talk about predictive programming and mention movies that laid out our present situation 20 years ago as a foundation before diving heads first into comms.
It's a weird connection to make, I know that there's not always a ton of overlap between weeb shit and our side all the time and that I tend to be an outlier, but the conversations today culminated in me making that mental connection and it's like, wow. Reality is almost directly mirrored in that series.
OK … Ill take the bait. What qualifies you as o e of the most talented persons alive? Im not being an asshole. I truly would love to know. U got my curiosity peaked.
People who are always with the winners (whoever it is) are traitors anyway.
First they’re with WEF because as you said they think they can get something from being there so they help to implement the great reset, scamdemic, etc. Then they do U turn, flipping where the wind blows.
I don’t know if Bartiromo was really in WEF as we know this organisation now or it was years before they established/revealed their course but she was very verbal (on the right side) pointing at the correct issues for a long time.
Putin was in there for just that.
They would have to be extremely in the know from a young age, and essentially brilliant as far as IQ goes.
This title is a good question.
Or maybe WEF requires that there be a back and forth that leads people to a consensus that there is a problem that needs to be solved?
The wef is not a problem solving organization for the people. It works for the deep state. Funded by a people who committed to take down America
I'm saying they create a problem, or issue to debate about, creating an illusion that there is a problem.
Yes for sure they do. It frost me they think we need them.
I wonder if the WEF weaponised perception by just putting up pictures and “claiming” people as members Willy milly. Up until recently politicos etc wouldn’t have pushed back as they’d have just taken the association to add clout to their resume. Maybe the WEF used it as a strategy to gain clout by claiming anyone who was someone was involved to lend credibility to their shenanigans? I know one British MP who explicitly denied membership and said they put his pic up there after he had 1 brief meeting with them at parliament? If we maintain scepticism with anything and everything including who the WEF claims as members unless there’s evidence to corroborate one way or the other it won’t do us a disservice.
Hah. Not to be the resident degenerate nerd, but for some reason your post made me make a mental connection to a secret society in a very recent anime called Lycoris Recoil.
The secret global organization (known as the Alan Institute) picks out exceptional individuals, such as actors, idols, performers, those who have exceptional hearing or exceptional reflexes that make them exceptionally good at killing.
Their marker that the talented receive is an owl pendant. This marks them as a product of the Alan Institute with exceptional talent in a specific field.
The main character was saved as a little girl with a mechanical heart transplant because of her incredible ability to read the actions of someone and the angle of the barrel of their gun, and the reflexes that she has to seemingly dodge bullets (though, she just moves before they fire).
She was saved because they viewed her as being the most talented killer with an unrivaled talent for killing. But she spent her life helping people and using nonlethal rounds, refusing to kill anyone because she felt like she was given a chance to live and do good. Which ultimately angers the institute and causes them to try and kill her.
The owl imagery, secret society global organization with its fangs in every aspect of life through talented individuals, and your post pointing out that no one is loyal and it's about what they can get struck a chord and reminded me of this.
If I had a tinfoil hat, I'd throw it on and call it soft disclosure, thinking back to it. It's wrapped with a couple of "woke" seeming layers, but that organization is distinctly the bad guys.
Interesting, decodingsymbols made the connection that "Alan" "Allen" etc is code for MK programmer. As in Allen Wrenches to adjust the screws. "Having a screw loose".
I can consider it, but the implications of that being a code means Paul Allen (Microsoft) and Woody Allen were somehow related to MK, which I can believe that, but I can't talk to normies about that shit. Every time I try to explain coded news to someone, I can feel the judgement and discomfort and talking about Allen being a code for "having a screw loose" and needing to fix the MK programming is like explaining DUMBs. You're going to get insulted in very predictable ways for explaining certain things to normies.
Yes, you can't talk about symbolic comms to people who have no clue about them. You'll come across as schizophrenic and it's by design.
They'll think you're getting your crazy ideas from the movies and television shows and extrapolating them on the real world.
You're much better off to talk about predictive programming and mention movies that laid out our present situation 20 years ago as a foundation before diving heads first into comms.
I don't believe or disbelieve. It's not my place for that. However, it sounds a lot like what they do, anyway.
They've invaded our education, our entertainment, our politics, our businesses, etc.
It's a weird connection to make, I know that there's not always a ton of overlap between weeb shit and our side all the time and that I tend to be an outlier, but the conversations today culminated in me making that mental connection and it's like, wow. Reality is almost directly mirrored in that series.
you and me both brother. have you read the Andy Pero story, Project Superman?
OK … Ill take the bait. What qualifies you as o e of the most talented persons alive? Im not being an asshole. I truly would love to know. U got my curiosity peaked.
People who are always with the winners (whoever it is) are traitors anyway.
First they’re with WEF because as you said they think they can get something from being there so they help to implement the great reset, scamdemic, etc. Then they do U turn, flipping where the wind blows.
I don’t know if Bartiromo was really in WEF as we know this organisation now or it was years before they established/revealed their course but she was very verbal (on the right side) pointing at the correct issues for a long time.
If you are in the wef the wef will eventually control you.
It's not something you quit.