President Trump..."Hope So"
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Every single person who is saying Durham is done, is directly accusing Trump of feeding us false hope.
Trump doesn’t do things haphazardly. He retruthed this for a reason.
WHY? Because he was alerting to us that Durham still has more to come.
If you believe Trump is wrong/lying/misleading us, then what does that make you for supporting him?
Trump is suggesting more is to come from Durham. And if you don’t trust Trump at this point, then let me tell ya… y’all are in the WRONG place.
-Clandestine
We see Durhams path; two spokes in the wheel of Russia Hoax corruption.
Sussmann Trial
The Sussmann angle; HRC approved the plan as per Mook's testimony
FBI had/has office space within Perkins, Coie law firm, which proves FBI was working with HRC/others to further their nefarious plan to push the Alfa Bank hoax, which was a sidebar to the Russia Hoax, all to get Trump out of office when they knew everything was fake, phony & false.
Witness (hostile) testimony from the snake himself; Marc Elias may be used in other subsequent trials
The circle of 'players' in the corruption (RICO Crimes)
Durham cannot get a fair trial in DC
Danchenko Trial
Exposes FBI/DOJ Confidential Human Source and how much of tax payers' money they put up to get dirt on Trump (even fake dirt!)
Names more corrupt FBI & Clinton cronies willing to commit criminal acts (treason) to get Trump
Durham to personally try this case in court
Durham once again cannot get a fair trial in DC
Much much more
Question; How is it possible that two separate paneled grand juries could find evidence of crimes committed of these individuals and both panels voted to indict?** However, in each trial so far, both Sussmann & Danchenko BY JURY DECISION/VOTE were acquitted of all charges?
**Only after each grand juror has been given the opportunity to be heard will the vote be taken. It should be remembered that at least 16 jurors must be present and 12 members must vote in favor of the indictment before it may be returned (copy/paste from Google search results on grand juries)
A federal grand jury can take action only on federal crimes that have been committed within the district in which it has been impaneled.
So, if 90% of DC is Democrat, then how could the grand jury have issued indictments in the first place to bring these to trial? Seems hardly unlikely and improbable according to the overwhelming ratio.
Durham was introduced into the system by Sessions on the same exact day Q started posting. And Q's last word was "Durham" before leaving.
Thanks for posting this here. I actually deleted Tom Fitton from my Truth feed yesterday because of his negativity toward Durham. I also took issue with General Flynn’s criticism of Durham, they should be criticizing the broken system and highlighting the conspiracy that Durham exposed in these trials.
Durham is not done by a long shot. Once again, this "failure" has introduced more information into court records to be used at a later date.
Indeed. Lots of bombs now public record. Either there is more cases in the background, tribunals or sealed grand juries, and/or the info can now be used in new lawsuits.
Odd comparison, given that the Terminator always lost.
Durham is inflicting pain on them everyday...more indictments to follow to the top of Scavino's ladder (picture from his post a few days ago)
Shouldn't Trump know?
Truthfully, I would rather the MSM keep lulling the dummies to sleep on this one. That way Durham may be able to operate a bit more stealth.
The issue it this is starting to feel like hunting ex-Nazis 80 years after the fact instead of when that would have made a difference.