So, from what I've read, military tribunals are for treason. Who initiates the tribunals? https://www.lawsuitlegal.com/military-law/can-civilians-be-tried-in-military-court.php "Without the declaration of a martial law, civilians in the United States can’t be tried under the military courts."...... "Military tribunals for civilians were used during the revolutionary war and immediately following the Civil War. Military courts used to try civilians was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Ex parte Milligan in any jurisdiction where civil courts are functioning."
I further read, " On a national level, both the US President and the US Congress have the power, within certain constraints, to impose martial law since both can be in charge of the militia."
So, I guess the plan is to win both houses next month and declare martial law?
This election like 2020 is being watched from Space. 2020 was allowed to happen because it had to but this one will be where the trap slams shut on them.2022 is when the house of cards comes down on them.
in any jurisdiction where civil courts are functioning.
Define functioning. Is a court functioning just because it is seated? Is a court functioning when outcomes are unequal? Are the courts functioning when an obviously guilty defendant, proven guilty without a doubt, is set free by a biased jury?
The verdict of these two Durham cases may not only be what they expected but what they needed to take this thing to the tribunal level. Id have to think that a reasonable man would assume that in this two tiered Justice system that our courts are not functioning.
If the goal was to waken the U.S. public to the corruption and collusion within the DOJ, FBI and the Administration... finding key players innocent of all charges and having the Main Stream Media broadcasting that these people did nothing wrong... isn't a great way of awakening people.
If anything, it just reinforces that there is nothing wrong, so no reason to wake up.
First step is to get the public to understand the FBI was not lied to during the investigation into Trump. Next the public will be educated to the fact that the whole thing was a hoax. Finally, the public will be made aware that the FBI continuing this hoax is Treason. Checkmate.
I read about polls (which I tend to think are mostly controlled) saying the majority of people know it was a fraudulent election and have the majority supporting Trump in terms of a theoretical 2024 matchup with anyone else. The mainstream media doesn't cover this stuff so normies may not know about the details about the level of corruption. But I remember hearing early on that the military was keeping an eye on all presentations of evidence in courts. It is adding up. Hopefully. We'll see in the midterms what the general population believes. Getting control over twitter/truth/parler can only help.
Just getting it on record of the corruption at the fbi, clinton operation, doj, etc. Nobody knows these names. But for future trials of higher ups, the info is there on record. He's laying the groundwork. Showing that all the corruption came from the top.
He's losing because of where the cases are being tried. If he couldn't convict Sussman, who basically admitted he lied to the FBI, he'll never convict anybody. That was as open and shut as you can possibly get
This idea that you have to get "evidence on the record" is stupid. All the evidence relevant to cases against anyone higher up than these two stooges would have been admissible because it's a part of the bigger picture. They could've been brought as witnesses against Clinton etc.
Now there's no incentive for either of these morons to testify against anybody because they've been found innocent
The trial proved that Russia Gate was a premeditated fraud committed by the FBI. In other words, Treason was proven.
So, from what I've read, military tribunals are for treason. Who initiates the tribunals? https://www.lawsuitlegal.com/military-law/can-civilians-be-tried-in-military-court.php "Without the declaration of a martial law, civilians in the United States can’t be tried under the military courts."...... "Military tribunals for civilians were used during the revolutionary war and immediately following the Civil War. Military courts used to try civilians was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Ex parte Milligan in any jurisdiction where civil courts are functioning." I further read, " On a national level, both the US President and the US Congress have the power, within certain constraints, to impose martial law since both can be in charge of the militia." So, I guess the plan is to win both houses next month and declare martial law?
Coming soon after the elections are stolen or Demtards start riots, either way it'll likely happen. Devolution.
Yes. Either the scenario I posted or devolution. Either way, NCSWIC.
This election like 2020 is being watched from Space. 2020 was allowed to happen because it had to but this one will be where the trap slams shut on them.2022 is when the house of cards comes down on them.
Define functioning. Is a court functioning just because it is seated? Is a court functioning when outcomes are unequal? Are the courts functioning when an obviously guilty defendant, proven guilty without a doubt, is set free by a biased jury?
The verdict of these two Durham cases may not only be what they expected but what they needed to take this thing to the tribunal level. Id have to think that a reasonable man would assume that in this two tiered Justice system that our courts are not functioning.
If the goal was to waken the U.S. public to the corruption and collusion within the DOJ, FBI and the Administration... finding key players innocent of all charges and having the Main Stream Media broadcasting that these people did nothing wrong... isn't a great way of awakening people.
If anything, it just reinforces that there is nothing wrong, so no reason to wake up.
First step is to get the public to understand the FBI was not lied to during the investigation into Trump. Next the public will be educated to the fact that the whole thing was a hoax. Finally, the public will be made aware that the FBI continuing this hoax is Treason. Checkmate.
Leftist media would never say these people did anything wrong even if he was convicted.
I hope this is the case.
I'm liking him less but if I ignore the personal attack posts, there are still good factual informative posts and those are the ones I'm after.
right?
I mean cool but 90+% of people I talk to have zero idea this is even happening.
I read about polls (which I tend to think are mostly controlled) saying the majority of people know it was a fraudulent election and have the majority supporting Trump in terms of a theoretical 2024 matchup with anyone else. The mainstream media doesn't cover this stuff so normies may not know about the details about the level of corruption. But I remember hearing early on that the military was keeping an eye on all presentations of evidence in courts. It is adding up. Hopefully. We'll see in the midterms what the general population believes. Getting control over twitter/truth/parler can only help.
don't care what this tulsi grifter has to say
Just getting it on record of the corruption at the fbi, clinton operation, doj, etc. Nobody knows these names. But for future trials of higher ups, the info is there on record. He's laying the groundwork. Showing that all the corruption came from the top.
He's losing because of where the cases are being tried. If he couldn't convict Sussman, who basically admitted he lied to the FBI, he'll never convict anybody. That was as open and shut as you can possibly get
This idea that you have to get "evidence on the record" is stupid. All the evidence relevant to cases against anyone higher up than these two stooges would have been admissible because it's a part of the bigger picture. They could've been brought as witnesses against Clinton etc.
Now there's no incentive for either of these morons to testify against anybody because they've been found innocent