He thinks that all tests were lies, all math is bogus and incapable of knowing explosive yield, and that because we use TNT as a yield measurement it clearly means they don't exist.
"There is no such thing as a nuke. It is a manufactured explosion designed to convince people that men have the right to take control of a woman’s body."
~signed, some fat ugly chick with really bad hair.
The videos of those tests are about as laughably fake as the Apollo missions buddy. Only 1 reporter was allowed to take pictures. And what about all the nasty fallout that's supposed to be there? The towns was back up and running 3 days later.
That's probably because you don't know anything about the "official narrative." Read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone and you will have all the info. The tests were real (I have a sample of trinitite from the Trinity event.) The bombings were real (my father saw the ruins of Nagasaki). And the threat is real (I spent half my career working in strategic defense with a Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information clearance).
The reason they use tons of TNT as a characterization is (1) people can relate to TNT, and (2) before they set off the Trinity device, they conducted a "full scale" explosion of thousands of tons of TNT to calibrate the Trinity results. I kinda bet you didn't know that, did you?
He thinks that all tests were lies, all math is bogus and incapable of knowing explosive yield, and that because we use TNT as a yield measurement it clearly means they don't exist.
Huge-ass eye roll.
He's right. Nukes don't exist. We've been lied to for a very long time.
"There is no such thing as a nuke. It is a manufactured explosion designed to convince people that men have the right to take control of a woman’s body."
~signed, some fat ugly chick with really bad hair.
The videos of those tests are about as laughably fake as the Apollo missions buddy. Only 1 reporter was allowed to take pictures. And what about all the nasty fallout that's supposed to be there? The towns was back up and running 3 days later.
Sorry if I don't believe the official narrative.
Okie dokie. Good for you for questioning the official narrative.
That's probably because you don't know anything about the "official narrative." Read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone and you will have all the info. The tests were real (I have a sample of trinitite from the Trinity event.) The bombings were real (my father saw the ruins of Nagasaki). And the threat is real (I spent half my career working in strategic defense with a Classified Nuclear Weapon Design Information clearance).
The reason they use tons of TNT as a characterization is (1) people can relate to TNT, and (2) before they set off the Trinity device, they conducted a "full scale" explosion of thousands of tons of TNT to calibrate the Trinity results. I kinda bet you didn't know that, did you?
I'm with you brother. I just heard that they scared the baby boomers in school with "duck and cover" propaganda frequently.