As I understand it the Q plan is to return power to the people, whilst at the same time exposing the DS (add your preferred descriptor) and have them removed by legal means.
I am uncertain what your point is, it seems you want to live in some sort of non-governmental commune. Not sure hoe you economic situation would work, how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken.
What I have presented was what my research suggests is the real problem. It wasn't intended to provide a solution.
Not to say I can't make arguments for solutions, I can and have many times. The first step in any solution however, is in everyone seeing the REAL PROBLEM. The problem is not the Cabal (per se), but what they have done. What they have done is create the belief in the need for a Centralized Authority. We believe we must be Ruled. By this belief they can put in whatever they want. They can put in a "good Ruler" when they need to dial it back a bit, but the Centralized Authority is still in charge, committing the same fraud.
You assume I suggested a solution ("some sort of non-governmental commune") when I have offered nothing in that regard. I certainly didn't suggest anything (that I am aware of) that would promote what I quoted from you.
how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken
What "amenities" do you suggest we need (presumably you mean from some Central Authority)? Why do amenities need to be "provided" (given to us) by anyone? Who is providing them? Who is paying for them? Who is making them? How are they taken from those who are paying for them and/or making them and being provided to you?
Who is making decisions? What decisions need to be made?
If I live in a town, do I need a National Government to decide what the towns school teaches? Do I need a National Government (or any group of people) to force my children to learn what they deign important? Do I need a National Government to decide what are the best laws for the local community? Do I need a State Government for that? What decisions could a National and/or State Government possibly need to make to help me live in harmony with my neighbors?
Things like National Security are only necessary because the Cabal makes all wars. Things like International Relations are only necessary because the Cabal runs all countries. We The People never make war. A group of people will never attack another group of people unless they need food, or some other necessity, or because there is a propaganda campaign to make people believe there is a need (that almost certainly doesn't actually exist).
It is the Cabal that takes over countries for more resources. They do it all the time because they want it all. And they convince us to kill each other so they can achieve their goals. "National Security" is a fraud. It is a Con. The Cabal is always both sides.
I think just like you. It's amazing how people will imagine that you have proposed a fully fledged solution, when all you did was point out some obvious problems with the current system. I too also have some potential solutions, or at least starting points, up my sleeves.
The USA is unique as to how it is set up and run and our constitution that backs all of us up. If you want to have a nation, you need a "government" or a leader. USA is set up so that there are many checks and balances between the elected Federal Government, elected State government and we the people. Our government has specific jobs and duties they are supposed to be doing beyond anything else they come up with to do. THE current government is undermining everything it is elected to do. Keep our nation's Sovereignty protected is a big one and it is failing that big time atm. Nations need a head because, Nations need to interact with other Nations and Need a national military to keep other nations from overrunning the place and taking over. Trade with other Nations is another reason to have a government. Government's that are too large (who bi pass the checks n balances to get what they want) or too small (dictator) end up screwing everyone in that nation over. IMO.
The purpose of Govt is to protect the rights and property of the people. It should do that and no more. The idea that this protection isnβt needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
The idea that this protection isnβt needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
Two things.
First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.
Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.
Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean the Rulers of the many) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."
That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."
I don't necessary agree with "common descent." Also, the definition of "territory" is very important and not well understood in the legal sense. It is "territory" (AKA Jurisdiction AKA the area over which a Sovereign's Word (diction) is Law (Juris)) where all the fuckery happens. That doesn't mean territory has to be defined that way, but it is how it is defined. It is that definition that is fundamental to the fraud.
Nevertheless, without getting too strict with some of the words, I agree with your definition. Notice that no where in there is there a requirement for a Ruler as demanded through abuse of the legal conceptualization of Territory.
As I understand it the Q plan is to return power to the people, whilst at the same time exposing the DS (add your preferred descriptor) and have them removed by legal means.
I am uncertain what your point is, it seems you want to live in some sort of non-governmental commune. Not sure hoe you economic situation would work, how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken.
What I have presented was what my research suggests is the real problem. It wasn't intended to provide a solution.
Not to say I can't make arguments for solutions, I can and have many times. The first step in any solution however, is in everyone seeing the REAL PROBLEM. The problem is not the Cabal (per se), but what they have done. What they have done is create the belief in the need for a Centralized Authority. We believe we must be Ruled. By this belief they can put in whatever they want. They can put in a "good Ruler" when they need to dial it back a bit, but the Centralized Authority is still in charge, committing the same fraud.
You assume I suggested a solution ("some sort of non-governmental commune") when I have offered nothing in that regard. I certainly didn't suggest anything (that I am aware of) that would promote what I quoted from you.
What "amenities" do you suggest we need (presumably you mean from some Central Authority)? Why do amenities need to be "provided" (given to us) by anyone? Who is providing them? Who is paying for them? Who is making them? How are they taken from those who are paying for them and/or making them and being provided to you?
Who is making decisions? What decisions need to be made?
If I live in a town, do I need a National Government to decide what the towns school teaches? Do I need a National Government (or any group of people) to force my children to learn what they deign important? Do I need a National Government to decide what are the best laws for the local community? Do I need a State Government for that? What decisions could a National and/or State Government possibly need to make to help me live in harmony with my neighbors?
Things like National Security are only necessary because the Cabal makes all wars. Things like International Relations are only necessary because the Cabal runs all countries. We The People never make war. A group of people will never attack another group of people unless they need food, or some other necessity, or because there is a propaganda campaign to make people believe there is a need (that almost certainly doesn't actually exist).
It is the Cabal that takes over countries for more resources. They do it all the time because they want it all. And they convince us to kill each other so they can achieve their goals. "National Security" is a fraud. It is a Con. The Cabal is always both sides.
I think just like you. It's amazing how people will imagine that you have proposed a fully fledged solution, when all you did was point out some obvious problems with the current system. I too also have some potential solutions, or at least starting points, up my sleeves.
The USA is unique as to how it is set up and run and our constitution that backs all of us up. If you want to have a nation, you need a "government" or a leader. USA is set up so that there are many checks and balances between the elected Federal Government, elected State government and we the people. Our government has specific jobs and duties they are supposed to be doing beyond anything else they come up with to do. THE current government is undermining everything it is elected to do. Keep our nation's Sovereignty protected is a big one and it is failing that big time atm. Nations need a head because, Nations need to interact with other Nations and Need a national military to keep other nations from overrunning the place and taking over. Trade with other Nations is another reason to have a government. Government's that are too large (who bi pass the checks n balances to get what they want) or too small (dictator) end up screwing everyone in that nation over. IMO.
What is a "nation" and why would you want one?
The purpose of Govt is to protect the rights and property of the people. It should do that and no more. The idea that this protection isnβt needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
Two things.
First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.
Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.
Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:
This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean the Rulers of the many) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."
That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."
a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory??
Excellent reply.
I don't necessary agree with "common descent." Also, the definition of "territory" is very important and not well understood in the legal sense. It is "territory" (AKA Jurisdiction AKA the area over which a Sovereign's Word (diction) is Law (Juris)) where all the fuckery happens. That doesn't mean territory has to be defined that way, but it is how it is defined. It is that definition that is fundamental to the fraud.
Nevertheless, without getting too strict with some of the words, I agree with your definition. Notice that no where in there is there a requirement for a Ruler as demanded through abuse of the legal conceptualization of Territory.