My latest survey shatters all of the myths that the CDC has used to ignore the VAERS safety data. There are more reports for these vaccines because there are more events observed.
Steve Kirsch
Comments (23)
sorted by:
FTA: The CDC made a similar claim in 2009 in the Slade report in order to dismiss the huge rate of adverse events in VAERS for the Gardasil vaccine...
So the CDC simply dismisses any facts it doesn't like. How convenient for them.
Facts? We don't need no stinking facts....
Facts are for cats!
...doggy winks...
Total speculation from my part but I've always wonder why the people that took the vaccine in my country has much less deaths and less adverse events, than say, the US.
I have to suspect that they really wanted total control of the US so badly because the US is the lynchpin to their globalists plans, that they gave you Americans a much more 'potent' batch of the covid vaccine to make you guys so ill that it would have caused a real pandemic of the vaccinated.
I'm I nuts to think like this?
Can't prove shit because no one have tested the vaccines in a lab.
Filed Under "Highly Probable"....
perhaps, but that wouldn't seem to explain all the footballers and other pro athletes collapsing around the world including deaths that aren't American
Saskatchewan took a big hit , I know of many who died from im sure the jab , one friend alone lost 7 people 6 family members and his best friend , all live in that town ! However, I don’t doubt what your saying but I thought Canada had a huge hit in deaths , no ?
The people who refused the vax are more likely the ones who are distrustful of the government and their vaccine in the first place. They cannot target the anti government group with the vax.
The number of VAERS death showing up has remained stagnant for about 6 months, hovering around 31,000. This tells me that the individuals with access to VAERS are suppressing or culling the reports.
Indeed.
There is no way that these numbers can remain stagnant for months on end.
All I needed to know about this can be answered by what followup the CDC did with the reports VAERS got. As far as I can tell it didn't investigate and the only reason you don't do that in the face of all the reports coming in is if you're deliberately trying to not find problems.
Problems? We don't need no stinking problems....
The double dog avatars have my head spinning... Adog and D&B..... both are good puppers
u/#howl
I have an attorney friend of mine who doesn't believe anything anyone says about the unofficial problems with the VAX, he is totally brainwashed, he is either stupid, nieve or corrupt, my money is on the corrupt.
What? We've been lied to?
...shocking....
Apparently true, read the link article!
250 healthcare workers* who read Steve Kirsch agree with Steve Kirsch.. not much of a headline.
I would like to see a similar study with an unbiased group HC workers though.
*or people who claim to be healthcare workers that filled out an anonymous form on the internet. Hell, some of the people in the notes section of the results bluntly claim that they no longer even work in the field, so how could they have filed reports?