I am concerned for our soldiers (101st Airborne) in Poland, if they attempt to invade Odessa under Zelensky's guise of a dirty bomb, the Russians will defend themselves with a ferocity they have yet to display. Biden is hell bent on starting a nuclear war by making it look like the Russians provoked it and everyone knows that isn't so.
Or they could deploy missiles that would explode in a spectacular but harmless fireworks display simultaneously over London, Berlin, New York, and Los Angeles, to show that there really wouldn't be breathing space for a response after the first strike.
That's what everyone thinks: "Yeah, they'll throw a nuke at us, and then we'll wipe them out, so even if we lose a city, we win." This is unrealistic. They would do the nuke firestorm with their hypersonic missles and wipe us out in the first round. Maybe we have the same capability, but it seems like policy dunces don't know or are not doing the math. That's why I suggested multiple simultaneous fireworks in their exercises as a graphic illustration. Add one over Diego Garcia and Africa.
No matter what happens, we know that God Wins.
Something will activate the National Guard.
I am concerned for our soldiers (101st Airborne) in Poland, if they attempt to invade Odessa under Zelensky's guise of a dirty bomb, the Russians will defend themselves with a ferocity they have yet to display. Biden is hell bent on starting a nuclear war by making it look like the Russians provoked it and everyone knows that isn't so.
You are correct, they have a ready force of about 5,000 in Romania and a helicopter (H-60's) group and logistics group in Poland.
5000 against at least 500 000. That'll teach 'em.
Maybe Russia could do a feint, not hold the exercise and leave NATO exposed in its false flag attempt.
That's a Q style move.
Or 101st joins forces with Russia...
I wish
Or they could deploy missiles that would explode in a spectacular but harmless fireworks display simultaneously over London, Berlin, New York, and Los Angeles, to show that there really wouldn't be breathing space for a response after the first strike.
The minute they launch at us we would launch .. no?
That's what everyone thinks: "Yeah, they'll throw a nuke at us, and then we'll wipe them out, so even if we lose a city, we win." This is unrealistic. They would do the nuke firestorm with their hypersonic missles and wipe us out in the first round. Maybe we have the same capability, but it seems like policy dunces don't know or are not doing the math. That's why I suggested multiple simultaneous fireworks in their exercises as a graphic illustration. Add one over Diego Garcia and Africa.
Proposed real tsunami with radioactivity, from submarine vs. airstrike:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/14558205/russian-radioactive-tsunami-torepdo-poseidon-2m39/