"Intel Slava Z πΊπ¦π·πΊ Ukranian journalist on telegram:
The flight of a dirty bomb is planned by someone from the border of Belarus. The downing is planned over the Chernobyl zone to minimize the consequences. Zelensky will blame Russia and Belarus."
*WhereEVER that may be.
Brain no good.
'Where' works as well for my nickel.
A 'dirty' bomb is not an escalation if compared to, say, a plague being released, is it?
A dirty bomb isn't that bad on a global scale ... nothing like a plague except for those very, very close to the explosion.
The DS wants something nuclear to happen though ... they want to go all in on Ukraine and start WWIII. That's the plague ...
But wouldnt the rad contaminants blow over into poland and eastern germany? I live in eastern germany, right next to poland. I'm basically screwed if ANYONE for ANY REASON uses even so much as a low-yield tac in the western parts of Ukie, much less a dirty bomb with the ability to spread its material across half the center of europe :(
In short nope. Two main reasons: not that much fall out from a "dirty device" and also that is not the correct direction of weather system patterns in the region. The airstream would carry it mostly East and South. However, that wouldn't be an issue again, as a dirty device is no where near comparable in fallout to say a tactical nuke which has relatively minimal fallout in the scale of ordinance applicable.
Contamination levels would depend on the size of the dirty bomb.
Unless something has changed, a dirty bomb usually implies something that is relatively low yield (even lower yield than a tactical nuke) and, quite possibly, shoddily designed. These kinds of bombs would be used by terrorists or or other elements that wouldn't want to be identified. They're designed to spread a lot of radiation in a relatively small area (maybe a couple of city blocks). You'd need a hell of a lot of dirty bombs to spread significant radiation across half the center of Europe :-).
If a dirty bomb like what I described above goes off, I think you'd be fine where you are ... after such an event, you'll eventually be able to detect a tiny uptick in radiation almost anywhere on the planet, but the levels will be virtually negligible.
Tactical nukes are military battlefield nukes only a lot smaller ... those are a totally different animal ... those are more like traditional nuclear weapons. Those usually have the ability to wipe out everything within a 0.1 km or more of where it goes off and will kick up a lot more fallout ... still, if it's limited to the use of only a few of them, I don't think you'll have any problems where you are located.
One final note, the DS doesn't seems to be more in control of the Western Part of Ukraine ... if these things are going to go off, they'll more than likely be going off in the East. They are scum and will not want to harm any real estate they "own" ... they won't mind killing anyone in the East ... they're subhuman to the pedo filth.
I'd tell you not to panic (not like that helps), and I think you'll be OK where you are at.
Ehh, i have set myself high standards when it comes to linguistics, especially english. And "See you on the other side, where that may be." just reads wrong to my eyes. Besides it was a typo, i meant to type
whereGods damn it i did it again I MEANT TO TYPE WHEREVER but my fingers were ahead of my brain, as is often the case haha.I'd say it's no more of an escalation than posturing to invite a nation directly bordering Russia into NATO, with the implication of NATO-sponsored nuclear weapons being stationed on site.
I know MAD isn't really a thing anymore and i know that modern nuclear weapons aren't necessarily these mind-shatteringly massive explosions as was the case in Japan and the various tests but i can understand why Russia went into GTHOML mode. You wouldn't want your hostile neighbour to have weapons of mass destruction right next to you, would you? I certainly wouldn't. And certainly NOT when "the world" is telling me "No you cannot!" while treating this hostile neighbour as some freakish favoured pet.
I know Putin isn't some saint, i know there's plenty of corruption in Russia, but if i weigh one against the other, i say Russia and the eastern hemisphere are more in the right here than the so-called West. And besides, I never liked the West or felt like being part of the West. And i really don't appreciate this forever-US-Western world dominating foreign meddling policing hegemony.
Slavsia Rus!
You mispelt neighbor, the Redneck in me will forgive your grammar nazi on where however. HAHA!!
I'm in agreement with you, as a Texan I freely admit my double damned corrupt federal government is a bunch of corrupt barstewards, as is all of NATO and the U.N. and yadayadayada, yeah.
We are either a Thugocratic Oligarchy or an Oligarchal Thugocracy but we are no longer a Free republic.
Ukraine is nazified, as Russia puts it, I agree with that too. And it still ain't our fight, in the local european-Russian sense.
In the larger sense it probably IS our fight but maybe, just MAYBE only if we help Russia dismantle the biolabs and other nazification kinda doings. The things hillary and company helped set up in there.
This isn't the American taxpayers' wishes, to fight for nazis, to fund Ukraine's terrors. But it is our western governments as a whole doing it, yeah.
I really don't want to know what kind of fucked-up underground tiled walls blood smears horror chambers tHeY (the globs) run in Ukieland. The Outpost (movie) comes to mind.
You are deplorable, after all. : )
Just kidding. Thanks for the heads up.
I live to serve!Always happy to oblige!Points at ConPro
Haw haw! I don't care who i need to be deplorable towards! If needs must, i will be there, flinging my shit!
haha... and I was just referring to your name. But fling we must!
The name reflects the aim!
Made me laugh.
Always happy to make others happy :-D