American multinationals just fail to understand global employment law. Some bubblegum-and-kick-ass HNIC bangs the table and says fire 14% of everybody and his minions shout yessir right away sir.
Probably works fine in US but other countries have laws. In UK you can't just turn off people's computers and tell them they're gone, unless you want to get sued.
If you want to compare the US to "Europe" (which I am not in) then instead of random insults why not try getting a passport and going to other countries to see how things are done. "Differently" is what you will find. Nobody else copies your "at-will" or whatever you like to call it. You can fire people, but you better have a reason which will stand up in court.
"A new owner called Elon who doesn't like your face" will not cut it in the London twitter firings. Of course HR probably knew that and the firees will have been paid off not to sue.
Quite Right. Employment is a contract and therefore falls under contract law. The question to be considered is what does the employment contract state? What authority are you granted, privileges, and role has been accepted? What are the Terms and Conditions of employment. Every contract has this. There's much more and each State has it's own set of statutory laws for employment. The State grants permission to the corporation for doing business in the State.
Under contract law, the employment contract actually overrides Common Law and greatly curtails Constitutional Rights whenever in the company's environment. An employee is not afforded what an ordinary citizen has for rights before its government. A business is actually run under the precepts of Maritime law. It has the same operation structure as on a ship. Any deviation from this depends on the State's laws regarding employment.
If anyone wants to know what Mystery Babylon is, look no further than the corporate state. Explain to me, how corporations dictated vax☠xines to their employees when the corporation are not medically insured nor do they have qualified medical personnel. How did they breach the employment contract that no one signed or agreed to when they were originally hired? What did the Terms and Conditions say regarding this?
I don't believe anyone in UK was ever subject to a "no jab no job" edict. They came pretty close with putting the frighteners on the NHS and care home people but even there they bottled it at last minute.
American multinationals just fail to understand global employment law. Some bubblegum-and-kick-ass HNIC bangs the table and says fire 14% of everybody and his minions shout yessir right away sir.
Probably works fine in US but other countries have laws. In UK you can't just turn off people's computers and tell them they're gone, unless you want to get sued.
"Probably works fine in US but other countries have laws."
So does the US, you eurocentric twit.
If you want to compare the US to "Europe" (which I am not in) then instead of random insults why not try getting a passport and going to other countries to see how things are done. "Differently" is what you will find. Nobody else copies your "at-will" or whatever you like to call it. You can fire people, but you better have a reason which will stand up in court.
"A new owner called Elon who doesn't like your face" will not cut it in the London twitter firings. Of course HR probably knew that and the firees will have been paid off not to sue.
Quite Right. Employment is a contract and therefore falls under contract law. The question to be considered is what does the employment contract state? What authority are you granted, privileges, and role has been accepted? What are the Terms and Conditions of employment. Every contract has this. There's much more and each State has it's own set of statutory laws for employment. The State grants permission to the corporation for doing business in the State.
Under contract law, the employment contract actually overrides Common Law and greatly curtails Constitutional Rights whenever in the company's environment. An employee is not afforded what an ordinary citizen has for rights before its government. A business is actually run under the precepts of Maritime law. It has the same operation structure as on a ship. Any deviation from this depends on the State's laws regarding employment.
If anyone wants to know what Mystery Babylon is, look no further than the corporate state. Explain to me, how corporations dictated vax☠xines to their employees when the corporation are not medically insured nor do they have qualified medical personnel. How did they breach the employment contract that no one signed or agreed to when they were originally hired? What did the Terms and Conditions say regarding this?
At will employment makes most of everything moot. Especially since I'm pretty sure they got a severance which also eases any legal issues.
I don't believe anyone in UK was ever subject to a "no jab no job" edict. They came pretty close with putting the frighteners on the NHS and care home people but even there they bottled it at last minute.