My daughter was in daycare 1 mi from the Pentagon at the time of impact. I rushed back to get her and drove right past the E ring of the Pentagon facing Washington Blvd. There was no plane wreckage, only a gaping hole and smoldering debris.
The bigger question would be, why did no one see a jet flying in low? I know no one who saw/heard a low flying plane which would have been required to create a hole like that. Even at a decline of 45 degrees, people would have seen or heard a jet moving at 300-400 mph plane. Moreover, that area is surrounded by CCTV on a variety of buildings which would have caught something, even w/ 2020 NTSC cameras (425-525 lines res @ 10 fps).
A cruise missile, or other missile which can fly high and dive low and fast and far smaller than a jet, and quieter, would be easy to miss. The SLAM-ER is a high subsonic missile, moving at 530 mph.
Yeah, I had dropped her off and went back home about 6 mi away when my business partner called me to tell me to turn on the TV. He was on his way to NYC for a meeting and stopped at a rest area on the Turnpike. I tuned in just in time to see the second plane hit. Then the Pentagon started being reported as being hit. I grabbed my rifle and sidearm, jumped back in and raced back across Alexandria to Arlington, shocked to find Rt 27 was even open with slower moving traffic going by. Got to her about 90-120 minutes after the impact. It still seems surreal. Then I drove by the gaping hole for almost 2 more years following the attack taking her back and forth. Each time (wrongfully) seething against Muslims and OBL. Little did I know then it was our own government...
It was most likely an ALCM-class cruise missile, which is launched from aircraft. There is a photograph of such a cruise missile painted to look similar to a commercial passenger jet, albeit smaller. There is also the critical detail of an engine part found in the wreckage inside the Pentagon, an engine which could very likely been from said cruise missile.
There are witnesses to a "large plane" heading towards the Pentagon, then altering course and heading away after flying roughly overhead. Most everyone's attention was drawn to the explosion at the Pentagon, and few noticed this plane leaving the airspace.
I listened to a most interesting interview many years ago, of the taxi driver who had the street light fall onto his taxi. He changed his story twice, but was very nervous, and seemed to indicate, initially, that there were people who would harm him if he revealed certain details.
FBI put up a ten minute video on youtube back in 2011, but it went unnoticed up until a few weeks ago. It was discussed here as well. This tweet starts to play the video, but then stops. https://twitter.com/aric71/status/1577164424388878336?s=12
The original tweet in this thread is teminated, don’t know about the youtubevideo.
Anyway the video is a tour around the Pentagon surroundings shortly after the hit. One thing is missing as we near the crash site. The plane.
Great work, very little discussion about after the first day. I M H O this is a smoking gun.
The twitter thread was interesting because at least at the time it was the first time I read a Pentagon thread on social media that there wasn’t an eyewitness present claiming to have seen the plane, or maybe their brother did.
I agree it could have been fired at quite close range. That would reduce the issue of any unwanted sightings. Who knows how many CCTV cameras might have caught it if it had been fired from miles away?
Ive tried to look at google maps and such to get an idea of where it could have came from and one thing I have never seen research on is angle.
In all the videos what ever it is that hits the building, its already travelling parallel to the ground. So, I was working off a theory that a jumbo jet would not have been able to get passed the highway and to ground level and level off in the amount of space it had to do it in at the speed it was travelling.
That lead me to looking at the overpasses to see if it could have leveled off and flown under the overpass. No it would be impossible.
The only thing of that size that could, in my mind, be travelling parallel to the ground at that speed would have been a SCUD missile launched from a platform of some sort from under the nearby overpass.
According to the official explanation, a pilot who could barely fly a Cessna managed to fly a Boeing 757, which is a twin-engined jet airliner, into the side of The Pentagon at ground level. That was the culmination of a manoeuvre which caused the airliner to fly in a 300 degree circle while losing the exact amount of height to be at ground level at the time of impact.
You might think that an inexperienced pilot would just fly straight into the middle of the building from wherever he was but no, he needed to get close to the front door with quite a difficult move.
Correct a descending 270' turn with a rate of descent of 8000' pm by a guy who couldn't be trusted to fly a Cessna.
It didn't happen, no way could he have flown that profile and hit the Pentagon level after taking out several lamp posts and dodging the overpass.
Pilots with 1000's of hours on type can't fly that profile, impossible for a complete novice, he would have over controlled massively and the aircraft would have ripped itself to pieces.
A fun fact, you know the video the FBLie released that came from the car park barrier? It had a grey squiggle then the fireball, and people were trying to say that grey squiggle was exhaust.
Well when run through software editing tools, it is clear that between frames 23 and 27, the grey squiggle has been moved and reversed!
Another one, the official reports has the 757 to the South of the main route in and south of the big mast there. However several eyewitnesses, including two on duty policeman who were getting gas at the Citgo gas station (which is to the North of the main route and the tower) gave testimony that without doubt they saw a 757 fly over the gas station, and the Arlington cemetery which is off to the North. The manager also saw a 757 as well as local workers, all saw it to the North of the route and tower/mast.
So again the official report doesn't match to the many eyewitnesses that were 100% sure.
Judicial watch obtained the full pentagon security cam footage (only one ever released that I know of). Look at the first frame in this video from my twitter acct (sorry for twat lol). It’s clearly not a passenger 757 or whatever and if you look up Russian cruise missile in Ukraine, it clearly sounds like a jet which to witnesses would sound like a passenger jet… then if you see the perfect hole that penetrated multiple walls… plus, it being the same area of the pentagon that stored the records of the 2trillion reported missing by Rumsfeld the day before… 👁🚀 evil
I believe that I read somewhere that the missing $2.3 trillion was being investigated in an office in one of the inner rings. That makes sense because only the bigwigs would get a room with a view.
However, a short time prior to 9/11 that office was apparently relocated. What a coincidence?
The data for the missing 2.3 trillion was housed exactly at the point that was hit at the Pentagon. In fact one worker there (I forget her name) was certain that as she hit the power for her PC the missile struck.
And the pattern repeats for both WTC 1 and 2, both areas hit held vital data on things like the Enron scandal, and the BCCI (read that as a money laundering bank) as well as the agencies that were housed in WTC7.
In essence, every area that was hit housed something connected to missing money and murky dealings.
You may recall just two days prior to 911 it was admitted that $2.3 Trillion dollars had been misplaced by the Pentagon. $2.3 Trillion dollars buys a lot of secret weapons for a Cabal.
My daughter was in daycare 1 mi from the Pentagon at the time of impact. I rushed back to get her and drove right past the E ring of the Pentagon facing Washington Blvd. There was no plane wreckage, only a gaping hole and smoldering debris.
The bigger question would be, why did no one see a jet flying in low? I know no one who saw/heard a low flying plane which would have been required to create a hole like that. Even at a decline of 45 degrees, people would have seen or heard a jet moving at 300-400 mph plane. Moreover, that area is surrounded by CCTV on a variety of buildings which would have caught something, even w/ 2020 NTSC cameras (425-525 lines res @ 10 fps).
A cruise missile, or other missile which can fly high and dive low and fast and far smaller than a jet, and quieter, would be easy to miss. The SLAM-ER is a high subsonic missile, moving at 530 mph.
Read the Wiki account...total BS.
Geesh, that must have been terrifying for you. Glad she was okay.
Yeah, I had dropped her off and went back home about 6 mi away when my business partner called me to tell me to turn on the TV. He was on his way to NYC for a meeting and stopped at a rest area on the Turnpike. I tuned in just in time to see the second plane hit. Then the Pentagon started being reported as being hit. I grabbed my rifle and sidearm, jumped back in and raced back across Alexandria to Arlington, shocked to find Rt 27 was even open with slower moving traffic going by. Got to her about 90-120 minutes after the impact. It still seems surreal. Then I drove by the gaping hole for almost 2 more years following the attack taking her back and forth. Each time (wrongfully) seething against Muslims and OBL. Little did I know then it was our own government...
Sounds like she was too young to know, thankfully. Yes, there are plenty of people who have to be held accountable for the lies.
She was 4 at the time.
It was most likely an ALCM-class cruise missile, which is launched from aircraft. There is a photograph of such a cruise missile painted to look similar to a commercial passenger jet, albeit smaller. There is also the critical detail of an engine part found in the wreckage inside the Pentagon, an engine which could very likely been from said cruise missile.
There are witnesses to a "large plane" heading towards the Pentagon, then altering course and heading away after flying roughly overhead. Most everyone's attention was drawn to the explosion at the Pentagon, and few noticed this plane leaving the airspace.
I listened to a most interesting interview many years ago, of the taxi driver who had the street light fall onto his taxi. He changed his story twice, but was very nervous, and seemed to indicate, initially, that there were people who would harm him if he revealed certain details.
FBI put up a ten minute video on youtube back in 2011, but it went unnoticed up until a few weeks ago. It was discussed here as well. This tweet starts to play the video, but then stops. https://twitter.com/aric71/status/1577164424388878336?s=12
The original tweet in this thread is teminated, don’t know about the youtubevideo.
Anyway the video is a tour around the Pentagon surroundings shortly after the hit. One thing is missing as we near the crash site. The plane.
Great work, very little discussion about after the first day. I M H O this is a smoking gun.
The twitter thread was interesting because at least at the time it was the first time I read a Pentagon thread on social media that there wasn’t an eyewitness present claiming to have seen the plane, or maybe their brother did.
My thought has been it was fired from an underpass from a modified container trailer.
I agree it could have been fired at quite close range. That would reduce the issue of any unwanted sightings. Who knows how many CCTV cameras might have caught it if it had been fired from miles away?
Ive tried to look at google maps and such to get an idea of where it could have came from and one thing I have never seen research on is angle.
In all the videos what ever it is that hits the building, its already travelling parallel to the ground. So, I was working off a theory that a jumbo jet would not have been able to get passed the highway and to ground level and level off in the amount of space it had to do it in at the speed it was travelling.
That lead me to looking at the overpasses to see if it could have leveled off and flown under the overpass. No it would be impossible.
The only thing of that size that could, in my mind, be travelling parallel to the ground at that speed would have been a SCUD missile launched from a platform of some sort from under the nearby overpass.
According to the official explanation, a pilot who could barely fly a Cessna managed to fly a Boeing 757, which is a twin-engined jet airliner, into the side of The Pentagon at ground level. That was the culmination of a manoeuvre which caused the airliner to fly in a 300 degree circle while losing the exact amount of height to be at ground level at the time of impact.
You might think that an inexperienced pilot would just fly straight into the middle of the building from wherever he was but no, he needed to get close to the front door with quite a difficult move.
Correct a descending 270' turn with a rate of descent of 8000' pm by a guy who couldn't be trusted to fly a Cessna.
It didn't happen, no way could he have flown that profile and hit the Pentagon level after taking out several lamp posts and dodging the overpass.
Pilots with 1000's of hours on type can't fly that profile, impossible for a complete novice, he would have over controlled massively and the aircraft would have ripped itself to pieces.
A fun fact, you know the video the FBLie released that came from the car park barrier? It had a grey squiggle then the fireball, and people were trying to say that grey squiggle was exhaust.
Well when run through software editing tools, it is clear that between frames 23 and 27, the grey squiggle has been moved and reversed!
Another one, the official reports has the 757 to the South of the main route in and south of the big mast there. However several eyewitnesses, including two on duty policeman who were getting gas at the Citgo gas station (which is to the North of the main route and the tower) gave testimony that without doubt they saw a 757 fly over the gas station, and the Arlington cemetery which is off to the North. The manager also saw a 757 as well as local workers, all saw it to the North of the route and tower/mast.
So again the official report doesn't match to the many eyewitnesses that were 100% sure.
I think that plane was to set up the witnesses so when asked whether they saw a plane they could all say, yes.
Judicial watch obtained the full pentagon security cam footage (only one ever released that I know of). Look at the first frame in this video from my twitter acct (sorry for twat lol). It’s clearly not a passenger 757 or whatever and if you look up Russian cruise missile in Ukraine, it clearly sounds like a jet which to witnesses would sound like a passenger jet… then if you see the perfect hole that penetrated multiple walls… plus, it being the same area of the pentagon that stored the records of the 2trillion reported missing by Rumsfeld the day before… 👁🚀 evil
https://twitter.com/wethepeeps4517/status/1225584580310204417?s=21
Edit: here is a quick vid of a cruise missile flying and sounding just like a jet
https://youtube.com/shorts/xLLURZMphvI?feature=share
I believe that I read somewhere that the missing $2.3 trillion was being investigated in an office in one of the inner rings. That makes sense because only the bigwigs would get a room with a view.
However, a short time prior to 9/11 that office was apparently relocated. What a coincidence?
The data for the missing 2.3 trillion was housed exactly at the point that was hit at the Pentagon. In fact one worker there (I forget her name) was certain that as she hit the power for her PC the missile struck.
And the pattern repeats for both WTC 1 and 2, both areas hit held vital data on things like the Enron scandal, and the BCCI (read that as a money laundering bank) as well as the agencies that were housed in WTC7.
In essence, every area that was hit housed something connected to missing money and murky dealings.
All planned, but not by OBL.
That certainly agrees with what I heard as well.
You may recall just two days prior to 911 it was admitted that $2.3 Trillion dollars had been misplaced by the Pentagon. $2.3 Trillion dollars buys a lot of secret weapons for a Cabal.
Could it be that the ICBM was covered with the panels used to cover stealth planes?