Got a Sneakin’ hunch Hobbs is in the process of being WITHDRAWN as we speak 👍👍😁
(media.greatawakening.win)
✅ - VOTE VOTE VOTE! - ✅
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Communists don't care about the country. They want to overthrow the country.
Is he hinting at he's aware of some fuckery and suggesting she give up now instead of going with the cheating and causing lots of havoc?
That's how I read it. I'm tired of this Hannity tick tock bullshit.
You’re probably tired of it because they never deliver. Constantly tease like something big and great is going to happen shortly, but then time goes by and nothing ever happens. Only an idiot wouldn’t get tired of such BS.
He has access to all the phone-call-in reports in the US to truethevote. So yeah I imagine he's heard all kinds of stuff.
Let's hope this is the case.
Oh good another vague comment by Gregg. Care to elaborate….?????
Looks like Hobbs is stealing the election.
*trying
Katie should fight back. I want to see how bad she got her ass whooped.
bad
how much did verbal warnings and threats really accomplish these past 2 years? That's not a rhetorical question, I'm honestly curious. So far, if this is them holding back for fear of consequences, I'm not sure how it could be worse without that restraining factor.
I suspect that's difficult to calculate without omniscience. Do you have a suggestion on how this would be measured?
Quantum Computing
But it wouldn't be measured but acted on instead.
It is very likely that all electronic/digital data created at the very least since 9/11 or shortly after has been captured or acquired. All of it.
The vast majority of historical data prior to the digital age has also been converted from paper, audio, photographic to electronic data. This would include things like ancient manuscripts and books covering all of prior human intellegence.
Electronic/Digital Data: Any data stored in static form (files, docs, PDF's etc.) on storage devices along with any data transmitted (bytes) not intended necessarily to be stored.
Once all known human data (intellegence) has been digitized (binary) into a single language it can be analyzed.
If an advanced AI program is written (I'm sure it has been) it can analyze all human intellegence, learn from our prior actions and habbits and develop a very accurate understanding of our behavior and how our actions affect our behavior and what outcomes they have produced good or bad. This program would also have an almost perfect understanding of our limits (governing structures, laws, morality, immorality, psychology etc.).
How does one test AI program for accuracy? Simple. Provide it with a scenario (beginning of WW2 for example) and see if it arrives at the same conclusion humans did (defeat of Nazi Germany) with a great degree of accuracy. Notice I said the testing was simple. The hard part would be the refinement and adjustments to get it to the point of accuracy.
Once the AI program has been run through enough historical scenarios and arrived at the same conclusions humans came to with enough accuracy and frequency than one may be able to safely assume it knows enough about human behavior in order to accurately PREDICT human behavior in the future. Predicting is NOT doing. In other words the AI program would not initiate anything on its own. It simply waits for input (data) and provides its best analysis of outcome based on factors or data that has been provided to it. At which time human can make decisions based on the AI's prediction. The give and take between human input and AI output could go on until infinity based on human action NOT on AI action. In other words AI is simply telling human what is likely going to happen given the scenario human just gave it. If human sees that his actions brought on nuclear war than human changes his behavior and re-runs the exercise. So human tells AI what it move it plans to do on the chess board, AI tells human what his opponent will counter with with an astronomical degree of accuracy. If human sees the counter will be bad for himself he simply doesn't make the move and changes strategy. Re-runs the chess moves and doesn't actually physically move the chess piece until he is happy that a counter move will benefit him.
Ok back to omniscience.
If AI has all prior human knowledge and history, knows our behavior and psychology it can predict our opponents moves given our moves. If AI has the power of super computing, is connected to EVERY data stream in REAL TIME as its happening (email, phone, text, news, covert intel etc) than it could in theory give its owner the ability to make moves and react in near real time to opponents counter moves in a way that benefits the owner and traps or places his opponent in a very bad position.
If you want this AI to step it up a notch, give it your opponents stream of thought. In other words access to your opponents emails, texts, live phone calls and all communications. Humans often seek advice and or broadcast our thoughts and intentions to loved ones and confidants before we even take those actions. AI would provide a set of possible predictor variables to owner before the opponents move is even made. You can now see how the owner could be well ahead of his opponent.
A Super Computer can easily do all of what I mentioned above. A Quantum Computer can model just about every human on earth in real time and make moves and counter moves based on earth's aggregate population actions and behavior. It simply needs real time data. I think we all know if there is one thing more plentiful than water it is real time data. We're pushing it out without a care in the world through every copper wire, fiber optic cable and frequency available. After all this AI program couldn't possibly exist...right?
Holy wall of text batman. I speed-read this, and think I got the gist of it. I'm skeptical on the capacity of such a computer. What type of storage medium is all this captured on? High capacity storage, afaik, is all on old-school hard disks, which are pretty limited in their speed for parsing the entire digital internet regarding a situation/problem being calculated. An "omniscient ai" would need quick access to a lot of data, but maybe that's possible in an effective way. (not real-time)
Then there's the quantum computer power needed to run a general intelligence (and the actual invention/discovery of one). Black projects don't have super-advanced technology in every field of science necessary for a project. But I guess if we're ok with us having far-out tinfoil technology (ufo's etc) then I just shrug and say sure, could be?
I'm pretty skeptical on the project lookingglass type stuff and a hyper-intelligent AI way beyond our leading researchers have made public is not really something I consider very often, but it's a shoe-in for something like an omniscience problem so who knows. I doubt we'll know the answer.
The funding, hardware, storage, bandwidth and AI complexity are next-gen stuff needed for this, that's for sure. They probably have a delivery of network-grade platter hard drives being delivered, installed and parsed every few hours. And a network that mirrors the Internet itself, to feed the beast. Also, a fabrication of high-quality quantum computer chips that are significantly above the current power level.
Thinking about this more, you could potentially have an AI you feed the internet into and have it train over a long time. (years) This would solve the storage problem, and needing fast access to all the ever-happened-in-existence Internet stuff. Perhaps connection to a NxA data system or something, but that would be fairly slow and not "omniscent" in a real-time way. Dunno, perhaps someone has done something like this. For sure groups are trying. Then all you need is high-power quantum supercomputer and a working general intelligence. (which afik doesn't exist in civilian life) Oh, and for it to be accurate, not just clever.
Quantum.gov
The National Quantum Initiative Act (NQI Act) was signed into law by President Trump on December 21, 2018 “to accelerate quantum research and development for the economic and national security of the United States.”
About
Yeah that would give the money for something like that. Curious stuff.
But let's go on the thought expirament that we can't yet accomplish the speeds needed for real time or maybe even near real time predictions. I would argue that requisite isn't needed for this tool to be successful. It does require however that you are in posession of the ONLY tool like this. If your opponent is in posession of a tool similar to than one just plays out the moves and victory would come to whomever had the most advanced tool. But if your opponent does not have one than time or speed is no object to the extent that you are able to prolong opponents end goal long enough to accomplish your win.
In theory this program would have already ran most possible scenarios and each particular scenarios decison tree into many moves and counter moves ahead. Likely wouldn't be as accurate but maybe still accurate enough for owner to make small pivots and adjustments for unexpected minor changes or data points within that scenario.
The owner would first initiate the tipping of the domino and it's reaction in a direction that's desirable then feed scenario through the AI loop and may get 3 possible outcomes and all moves within each branch. Owner waits on the counter move in order to know which one of the 3 scenarios the "game" will follow.
Again if 'time' is not an issue than every amalgamation of possible scenarios can in theory be ran through the loop with the owners intended 'end' as the goal. Owner just waits for unsuspecting opponent to take them down that path.
Anyway man. Just thinking out loud here.
Definitely an interesting topic, and not so far-fetched to require a significant suspension of disbelief.
I don't think a system that couldn't "probe the internet, know all the things and have a pulse on the global impact" would be fair to be said to be near-omniscient. I definitely could consider it being an expert on societal responses, though. Given enough meaningful data, sufficient quantum processing power and a working general intelligence that's properly trained (probably years and years) to be accurate.
You're right that could be very powerful, especially if your moves are slow enough, and you can game out enough possible winning scenarios to have a good end result.
That would be quite the Whopper you'd have there, and that's most certainly something I could imagine a particular type of branch would find useful for all kinds of planning scenarios.
The impacts of AI are terrifying, and wondrous.
This is the best summary of what I believe both sides are using against each other. Thanks for this.
Hobbs would never do what is good for the country.
She has had opportunities to do what is right, and every time, she does the opposite.
In her eyes, she is furthering the commie cause. I sure hope, if cheating has been done, the evidence was captured and will hold up in a court of law. That is if the lead holds up for Hobbs.
Ohh a little spicy this morning, I feel like I may need some 🍿 with my ☕️
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2023-07-05/the-us-military-is-taking-generative-ai-out-for-a-spin
Katie Hobbs has been a problem since 2020 - they probably promised her the Governor's mansion for loyalty - helping to steal the 2020 election - then making the audit results disappear - Shame on you Katie Hobbs - you are officially going to hell