Laxalt and Masters didn’t concede, and there are still ballots outstanding. The red pill would be colossal if the media prematurely called races to get candidates to concede. The public are primed.
We did our part. We showed up. Now it’s time for the Military to do theirs.
They are watching the election, and the bullshit is happening in plain sight.
-Clandestine
Would someone please explain the significance of conceding? I understand that it might stop TBTB looking into potential fraud, but it has no legal significance as far as I can tell. Meaning, if fraud is later found, it's not like it can be said, 'well, candidate A conceded, so there's nothing we can do.' Is that right?
I wonder about this too. I'm surprised Mastriano conceded at all let alone a Sunday! Seems weird timing.
Gore conceded to Bush in 2000, then called back to retract his concession when he saw a chance of winning. As far as I know, that concession had no bearing on the decision reached by the SC. (Which, as far as I am concerned was on the same level as the Obamacare decision.)
Thanks. I didn't know he called back his concession.
I didn't really have a horse in that race until the Iraq invasion, that is. (Doubt Gore would Gore have done different.) But I found his retraction really cringey, sort of like kids bickering on a ballfield.
We’re in a time of lawlessness. The rules are whatever they want them to be at the moment.
I wonder about this two. I'm surprised Mastriano conceded at all let alone a Sunday! Just seems weird timing.