My test normie specifically stated that I must be wrong about the vax being toxic because nobody else she knows believes that. No evidence or logic will change her mind. only the MSM or the balance of her friends and associates changing their minds.
It is crazy how often science changes and the people who rightfully rejected the original (wrong) idea are not apologized to, but instead, still criticized.
It's as though people believe that whatever science currently says is right, even if later data is uncovered that shows it was wrong. They can't understand that something that seemed right based on current data interpreted a certain way is now wrong. They think following the current science is always right, even when proven wrong.
If this is true, why are people here so obsessed with being proven to actually be the majority? It's a common thread, whether we're talking about Twitter or popular election results.
I think because in both of those cases and many others, the evidence is there… we know it, and not looking for Kudos or pats on the back, but much like with the rest of our input, we are trying to make those, that don’t realize, aware .. many of them aren’t as concerned about truth, but are fighting the herd syndrome they’ve been indoctrinated into and need to be part of a herd..
If that were the case, people wouldn't keep posting non-population-adjusted electoral maps to "prove" that "we're really in the majority"! Every time someone posts one of those, I cringe.
My point is more than about being accurate. My point is that assuming you are secretly the majority when you are actually not will lead you to make unwise decisions.
The "appeal to popularity." Media's golden fallacy - the people fall for it every time.
The normies do.
My test normie specifically stated that I must be wrong about the vax being toxic because nobody else she knows believes that. No evidence or logic will change her mind. only the MSM or the balance of her friends and associates changing their minds.
My test normie. 😂👍🏼
If all of your friends think you are an idiot, does that make you an idiot?
"Yeah, probably."
If all of your friends think you are a frog, does that make you a frog.
<brain freeze>
Rick Warren supported Obama.
Rick's head is about to explode along with many other Pastor's, who aren't necessarily evil, but blind.
It is crazy how often science changes and the people who rightfully rejected the original (wrong) idea are not apologized to, but instead, still criticized.
It's as though people believe that whatever science currently says is right, even if later data is uncovered that shows it was wrong. They can't understand that something that seemed right based on current data interpreted a certain way is now wrong. They think following the current science is always right, even when proven wrong.
serious meme of the day...
That should be "accepted by" what seems to be a majority. Because I think the people that know the truth far out number the ones that don't know.
Especially when it is not really a Majority... or it is a majority of bots...
If this is true, why are people here so obsessed with being proven to actually be the majority? It's a common thread, whether we're talking about Twitter or popular election results.
I think because in both of those cases and many others, the evidence is there… we know it, and not looking for Kudos or pats on the back, but much like with the rest of our input, we are trying to make those, that don’t realize, aware .. many of them aren’t as concerned about truth, but are fighting the herd syndrome they’ve been indoctrinated into and need to be part of a herd..
If that were the case, people wouldn't keep posting non-population-adjusted electoral maps to "prove" that "we're really in the majority"! Every time someone posts one of those, I cringe.
My point is more than about being accurate. My point is that assuming you are secretly the majority when you are actually not will lead you to make unwise decisions.
Big Mike will always be a man