I watched EP01 and it is* an interesting show. The outrage collected here simply means that there is something to it. No reason why they'd all pounce like this if there wasn't something juicy in it.
I tend to agree with this statement though, I myself have realized a long while ago now that, most all the science that is accepted as fact because, they push it as fact, is nothing but a theory "someone came up with" in the first place and others just used their findings based off the first guys thoughts, when it comes to science/human/animal and earth history. We are a species with amnesia of our past for the most and it gets darker every generation that passes.
I have been tracking Hancock's progress for a while and he keeps making links that make sense - I know he gets criticised for building off other people's work - but I find he's pretty good at giving his sources and giving credit to those sources - so I think that is just more establishment 'credentialism' to avoid the fact that he keeps on asking really, really good questions. How come the Great Pyramid - is a scale model of Earth? How come the Sphinx has water erosion marks if it is only 4500 years old and Egypt wasn't wet 4500 years ago and to get those marks it would have to be over twice that old. How come the Sphinx points to where Leo would have been on midsummer's day 13000 years ago. If civilisation is only 4500 years old - WTF Goblecki Tepe in Turkey which is also 13000 years old. And on and on and on with the good questions - and archeaology just dismisses everything he says. We know on this forum here that when credential establishment figures dismiss something - they're basically covering something up.
The problem is that academia stays within its artificial sectored boundaries. which is not how knowledge was approached, even a few hundred years ago. Archeologists do not really talk to Geologists, for example. Which is weird if you think about it - they are both digging into soil and dating stuff. What Hancock is doing is joining their dots, which is outrageous to the establishment. The same thing happens between Psychologists and Strategic Management types. Again - weird - why would management strategy not include a measure of how mass psychology works?
The premise of Science is to take a theory and disprove it. These days, people are trying to make science concrete and irrefutable, (famously illustrated by Pelosi's "Science, Science, science" comment) but that is not what is supposed to happen. Those people who disprove hypotheses, like Hancock and Carlson, are now seen as heretics. REEEeeeEEE.
You're just supposed to shut up and believe the Great Pyramid was built at the beginning of the Egyptian civilization and their building skills rapidly declined thereafter.
Yep, one of the first statments in the show was a guy interviewing Hancock and questioning why he couldn't just say this is weird and stop there?
Why did he have to make a theory around the weird?
I got so mad because making a theory around discovery is litterally what all of archeology does. Its all theoretical. It is all it will ever be. It is just the "accepted" theory. Doesn't make it fact.
Same as it has ever been. Why do you think they were and still are pushing "Big Bang Theory" as if 100% proven Fact or "Fossil Fuel" as fact when it comes to Petroleum? Whomever controls the science decides on what to record it as being.
All theories and people furthering their knowledge off those theories. Seems a good way for people to no longer be able to actually figure shit out in the long run unless, they scrap what they have been told and do as Graham has done, get out there and do your own research. heh.
By their own Standards shows like the History channel's Ancient Aliens should be cancelled and boycotted... but its not. So what gives about this Ancient Theory show that has their panties in a bunch
The point of the show is that our whole history was fabricated by the ruling class. That obviously includes the bible and all the religions they gave to the slave classes
It's not wild theories about aliens building stuff w/ a crazy dude w/ crazy hair. This guy is using carbon dating on subterranean structures that date back to pre-civilization time periods by tens of thousands of years... and finding underground lairs/buildings/etc. that go back even further.
I've never given too much credit to the wild Antarctica theories as they are mostly based on assumptions and outlandish ideas with nothing to back them up, but if this series goes into that, maybe this is the nerve he struck? Not sure yet, only got to EP01.
They block this but not the show 'Ancient Aliens'. Look here not there. One show may have some truth and one they can point and say 'look at the crazy conspiracy theorists'.
Its a good starting point but don't expect the truth on netflix. Its obvious that all our known history is a fabrication, there's plenty out there to research.
I watched EP01 and it is* an interesting show. The outrage collected here simply means that there is something to it. No reason why they'd all pounce like this if there wasn't something juicy in it.
I tend to agree with this statement though, I myself have realized a long while ago now that, most all the science that is accepted as fact because, they push it as fact, is nothing but a theory "someone came up with" in the first place and others just used their findings based off the first guys thoughts, when it comes to science/human/animal and earth history. We are a species with amnesia of our past for the most and it gets darker every generation that passes.
I have been tracking Hancock's progress for a while and he keeps making links that make sense - I know he gets criticised for building off other people's work - but I find he's pretty good at giving his sources and giving credit to those sources - so I think that is just more establishment 'credentialism' to avoid the fact that he keeps on asking really, really good questions. How come the Great Pyramid - is a scale model of Earth? How come the Sphinx has water erosion marks if it is only 4500 years old and Egypt wasn't wet 4500 years ago and to get those marks it would have to be over twice that old. How come the Sphinx points to where Leo would have been on midsummer's day 13000 years ago. If civilisation is only 4500 years old - WTF Goblecki Tepe in Turkey which is also 13000 years old. And on and on and on with the good questions - and archeaology just dismisses everything he says. We know on this forum here that when credential establishment figures dismiss something - they're basically covering something up.
Wierd criticism since that's supposedly literally what academia is
That too. They're desperate.
The problem is that academia stays within its artificial sectored boundaries. which is not how knowledge was approached, even a few hundred years ago. Archeologists do not really talk to Geologists, for example. Which is weird if you think about it - they are both digging into soil and dating stuff. What Hancock is doing is joining their dots, which is outrageous to the establishment. The same thing happens between Psychologists and Strategic Management types. Again - weird - why would management strategy not include a measure of how mass psychology works?
The premise of Science is to take a theory and disprove it. These days, people are trying to make science concrete and irrefutable, (famously illustrated by Pelosi's "Science, Science, science" comment) but that is not what is supposed to happen. Those people who disprove hypotheses, like Hancock and Carlson, are now seen as heretics. REEEeeeEEE.
You're just supposed to shut up and believe the Great Pyramid was built at the beginning of the Egyptian civilization and their building skills rapidly declined thereafter.
Only because evil rulers hide truth
Yep, one of the first statments in the show was a guy interviewing Hancock and questioning why he couldn't just say this is weird and stop there?
Why did he have to make a theory around the weird?
I got so mad because making a theory around discovery is litterally what all of archeology does. Its all theoretical. It is all it will ever be. It is just the "accepted" theory. Doesn't make it fact.
What a joke these "intelectuals" are.
Same as it has ever been. Why do you think they were and still are pushing "Big Bang Theory" as if 100% proven Fact or "Fossil Fuel" as fact when it comes to Petroleum? Whomever controls the science decides on what to record it as being. All theories and people furthering their knowledge off those theories. Seems a good way for people to no longer be able to actually figure shit out in the long run unless, they scrap what they have been told and do as Graham has done, get out there and do your own research. heh.
Look him up on Rogan too. Aw well as Randall Carlson
By their own Standards shows like the History channel's Ancient Aliens should be cancelled and boycotted... but its not. So what gives about this Ancient Theory show that has their panties in a bunch
Biblical truths I’m sure
The point of the show is that our whole history was fabricated by the ruling class. That obviously includes the bible and all the religions they gave to the slave classes
Is that your stance, or the show’s??
Agreed.
It's not wild theories about aliens building stuff w/ a crazy dude w/ crazy hair. This guy is using carbon dating on subterranean structures that date back to pre-civilization time periods by tens of thousands of years... and finding underground lairs/buildings/etc. that go back even further.
I've never given too much credit to the wild Antarctica theories as they are mostly based on assumptions and outlandish ideas with nothing to back them up, but if this series goes into that, maybe this is the nerve he struck? Not sure yet, only got to EP01.
They block this but not the show 'Ancient Aliens'. Look here not there. One show may have some truth and one they can point and say 'look at the crazy conspiracy theorists'.
Notice Ancient Aliens never bring up Hancock, only Zach Sitchen (sp?) and and of course Von Daniken
Its a good starting point but don't expect the truth on netflix. Its obvious that all our known history is a fabrication, there's plenty out there to research.