Looks like the argument was basically, it’s a frivolous case and should be tossed. However, it’s now in the SCOTUS so, that to me means, it’s not frivolous and has merit. Enough for them to hear.
Looks like the argument was basically, it’s a frivolous case and should be tossed. However, it’s now in the SCOTUS so, that to me means, it’s not frivolous and has merit. Enough for them to hear.
It’s on the docket, but that just means that Brunson filled out the form and mailed it to the right address. No one has gotten around to looking at it yet.
The waiver is just the solicitor general saying that the arguments that led to the lower courts dismissing the case as frivolous have already been adequately argued before those courts. There’s nothing more to say unless SCOTUS rules that the lower courts got this wrong…. and then the most likely outcome is that they will send the case back down to the lower court.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
What does this mean? https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/247457/20221123155305329_Waiver%20Letter%20-%2022-0380.pdf
Did they waive the right to respond because it garbage and they’re not wasting their time? Or they have no response because there’s no way out of it?
Wish I was an attorney but in their filing for the tenth circuit court: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221024152923186_20221024-152524-95757879-00000747.pdf
Looks like the argument was basically, it’s a frivolous case and should be tossed. However, it’s now in the SCOTUS so, that to me means, it’s not frivolous and has merit. Enough for them to hear.
Interesting event timeline: https://ralandbrunson.com/
Appears to have been started June 21, 2021
They answer my question and the waiver filed was the door opening for this to go to the SCOTUS.
Okay, this is interesting now.
Start at about the 12:00 mark (sorry for the Santa Surfing link, but I haven’t tried yet to find the original podcast)
This 15 min clip of the podcast discusses the case in greater length
https://rumble.com/v1wbwre-11212022-affirmation-scotus-case-brunson-shares-insight-libs-triggered-news.html
Thanks, fren.
Thanks for the link!
Anyone can file a petition for writ of certiorari.
Doesn’t mean it’ll be granted.
SCOTUS has not granted writ for this yet.
It’s on the docket, but that just means that Brunson filled out the form and mailed it to the right address. No one has gotten around to looking at it yet.
The waiver is just the solicitor general saying that the arguments that led to the lower courts dismissing the case as frivolous have already been adequately argued before those courts. There’s nothing more to say unless SCOTUS rules that the lower courts got this wrong…. and then the most likely outcome is that they will send the case back down to the lower court.
He got a call from the clerk of the court 5 days after skipping the 10th circuit under national emergency - rule 11.
Later the 10th circuit backed him up.
4 of 9 justices need to agree to hear the case
It Glows.