That third line does not make sense. Misusing "infer" when you should use "imply" is a very common mistake. I am no grammar nazi and I would not ordinarily consider it sufficiently important to flag up. BUT... this is Q and, as we know, literal meanings of words are important.
Yeah most of the first person singular references seem to be in the first like... few dozen drops or so. Even then there are only a handful of them, but they do exist.
ill do you one better: there is currently an individual credibly claiming to be Q, but he is universally hated here on this board and in general in the Q community. If you can put aside emotion and look into the situation logically without preconceived notions, you might be surprised with what you learn.
Yeah I've heard that before. I just don't think Q would almost openly state who he is. It would make him a huge target to the deep state but that's just me. I keep a watchful eye but don't really subscribe to any theory at this point
Not "a person," but 10 or fewer individuals, most military. A number of them write the actual posts, as there are different writing styles. And then there is Q+, probably Trump, as he has signed a photo for someone with Q+ added. I think that happened in 2018.
what makes you think Q is not a person? why would he refer to himself as "I" on multiple occasions? Is the team with a birds eye view fewer than 10? are Q and Q+ possibly the same person under different circumstances? Does it make sense that Trump, a civilian, is involved in a military operation in any capacity? A sitting president engaged in a regime change operation being conducted against his own nation? What kind of precedent would that set?
Q posts are written in varying writing styles, indicating multiple writers. Each writer can refer to himself as "I." As I said, Q is about 10 people, mostly military.
Q Post #60 - Nov. 2, 2017
"You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands.
Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military.
Why is this relevant?
Game theory.
Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information.
Operators never divulge.
Alice & Wonderland."
Also, Q Post #2567
"AF1 Code Change > Q 0 > Q+"
This certainly implies that Q+ = DJT.
Also, the close deltas between Q posts and DJT tweets would indicate his involvement.
Trump can write a lot without being actually involved in the physical operations. Trump signed a White House photo with Q+. I think it might have been with Lionel of Lionel Nation.
Is this the 1st time Q referred to him/herself in first person, “I”?
No, it isn't. Here's an example -
https://qagg.news/?read=170
u/#q170
That third line does not make sense. Misusing "infer" when you should use "imply" is a very common mistake. I am no grammar nazi and I would not ordinarily consider it sufficiently important to flag up. BUT... this is Q and, as we know, literal meanings of words are important.
Well spotted! I learn something every day.
Interesting! Seems it’s not that common, though, and very interesting that first person was used in the very early days of the drops.
Yeah most of the first person singular references seem to be in the first like... few dozen drops or so. Even then there are only a handful of them, but they do exist.
Does Q saying he was there in the day infer he wasn't employed nine to five or his job was military intelligence and that's what he did all day?
Q is a person alright. Most people just refuse to believe who right now. They,ll come around eventually.
I have my theories. But if someone previously thought dead turns up alive, I won't be surprised kek
ill do you one better: there is currently an individual credibly claiming to be Q, but he is universally hated here on this board and in general in the Q community. If you can put aside emotion and look into the situation logically without preconceived notions, you might be surprised with what you learn.
Yeah I've heard that before. I just don't think Q would almost openly state who he is. It would make him a huge target to the deep state but that's just me. I keep a watchful eye but don't really subscribe to any theory at this point
Not "a person," but 10 or fewer individuals, most military. A number of them write the actual posts, as there are different writing styles. And then there is Q+, probably Trump, as he has signed a photo for someone with Q+ added. I think that happened in 2018.
what makes you think Q is not a person? why would he refer to himself as "I" on multiple occasions? Is the team with a birds eye view fewer than 10? are Q and Q+ possibly the same person under different circumstances? Does it make sense that Trump, a civilian, is involved in a military operation in any capacity? A sitting president engaged in a regime change operation being conducted against his own nation? What kind of precedent would that set?
Q posts are written in varying writing styles, indicating multiple writers. Each writer can refer to himself as "I." As I said, Q is about 10 people, mostly military.
Q Post #60 - Nov. 2, 2017
"You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands. Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military. Why is this relevant? Game theory. Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information. Operators never divulge. Alice & Wonderland."
Also, Q Post #2567
"AF1 Code Change > Q 0 > Q+"
This certainly implies that Q+ = DJT.
Also, the close deltas between Q posts and DJT tweets would indicate his involvement.
Trump can write a lot without being actually involved in the physical operations. Trump signed a White House photo with Q+. I think it might have been with Lionel of Lionel Nation.
These things were covered years ago.