Q Posts- Remember your Oath- reminder for Brunson v Adams SCOTUS 22-380 Case?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
Not trying to be a doomer but do you guys really think the SCOTUS will be allowed to take this up? Much less rule in our favor?
That would mean removing 380 members of the federal government. That is most of the elected government.
My belief is that they should take the complaint and vote 9-0 in favor thus removing those members but recent history tells me that they will vote 3-6 to not take it up to even hear the complaint.
I am just trying to be real. Not shitting on it. The case is 100% legit and should be considered and ruled on. I think things are too far gone for that though.
A lot of people are not able to think logically.
The SC has already had MULTIPLE opportunities to quietly shut down this case before it ever got to this point. In fact, this is exactly what all the "expert" lawyers have been predicting every time this case is mentioned (Tracy Beanz is a good example).
The lawyers have been unanimous in their predictions that the SC would never touch this case. That it was a nothing burger. They have been proven wrong through every step of the process so far.
The SC has in fact gone out of their way to help bring the case forward. Let that REALLY sink in for a minute...
Why would the SC actively encourage the Brunson brothers to file the case (with modifications requested by the SC), only to then have it fail the conference vote on Jan. 6th? Does that make any sense to anyone?
Unless the whole thing is just a political move by the SC to warn the Congress not to try to impose term limits or pack the court. Who knows? We will see soon enough, starting with what the lame duck Congress does this month...
I have to agree.
I am surprised this case made it this far but burden of proof for civil cases is usually less than a criminal case.
So because of that reason alone I never say never because you don't know what the SC is thinking if they allowed it to pass so many obstacles so far.
Since the SC only rules on whether a lower court ruling was Constitutional, isn't whether the lower court case was civil or criminal irrelevant?
They proved that when they wouldnt even hear the case in 2020. There is not going to be a court solution to this. Not unless Q lied when he said the military is the only way. Dopium.
You are not thinking about optics here. Remember, they had to let them steal 2020 and 2022 elections. We can't be the only ones awaken, the rest of the US population needs to be awake before things can start rolling. Think about it. If they had tried to drain the swamp when Trump was still president, at the time, 50% still thought Trump was a russian asset, so the DS could have easily said that Trump is doing a coup. Then we would have had civil war. Even when Trump did his 2024 bid for president live announcement, he even stated towards the end of the speech that not enough people have woken up yet. So what I think is that the SC aided the DS to steal the election by not taking the cases, which gave the DS their ego boost thinking they won without suffering losses. So the DS thinks it controls the SC until the Roe v Wade situation. That showed to us that maybe white hats are in control. Because of Roe v Wade, the Demorats got shit on by their voter base for allowing this to happen. Now the DS knows that they dont control SC, so they try to pack it and set term limits. This also gives me an inclination that white hats are in control.
Military could still be the only way - either way.
They rule for, DOJ fails to enforce (and may move to arrest SC themselves) Mil steps in.
They rule against, Mil steps in and takes out all of them incl SC.
1 is most aligned w/Q IMO because it follows the rule of law more closely - think SCOTUS
Agreed. I used to think that option 2 was more likely, but then the SC reversed Roe v. Wade, and I changed my mind.
I now think option 1 is more likely. Quick and clean.
Going by past history, you are right. But if things have to change, they have to start somewhere and this case is the perfect start if and when it happens!
Nobody thought roe v Wade would actually get ditched. Or Trump would beat hildawg in 16.
I pray you are right
No I don't. Everytime there is a venue to fo something people go nuts over it. Shit or get off the pot.
As a vet myself, I understand that as a trooper, I’m not aware of the battle plans/strategy - and rightly so. We don’t know - either way, but this looks quite plausible to me. We all know there’s a plan, and the timing is very interesting and logical.
Don’t forget that one of the biggest weapons they had is now gone and they really are panicking. I don’t think anyone would deny that.