Since it appears there are efforts to memory-hole this existing, here are some proofs:
https://youtu.be/AG9on3BjYck?t=11100 a live stream where the post in question is shown, prior to its deletion. The email address is in the lower part of the image in the post, that has the text 'dorsey sent a her a copy of my substack article blasting the incident'
Doing a search for this text shows all the sites that archived the whole thread, including the post that was deleted. One example is:
With the damaging nature of what was NOT deleted, you might well wonder why one referencing a clear pedo connection to @jack merited special treatment and an attempt at a coverup.
Their asses were scorching with the last bit. He'll give them time to cool before he starts again. That should hold off their shut down of the internet, and it makes them feel the pain longer.
Based on my own experience with national/international corporate media and political operatives, plus years of Q training, this guess resonates.
Could other reasons also be in play? Definitely. Again, from my experience, multiple reasons usually exist for decisions around every move especially in "you bet your life" games.
Yeah, because they don't want another accidental "0.pizza" style reveal.
Please explain
Jack Dorsey's email ended in 0.pizza
Thank you
Jack Dorseys email address used that domain, as revealed in one of the tweet in the 'leak' sequence from Matt Taibbi. One he later deleted..
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZX85XVua/pizzagate-jack-dorseys-private-e/c/
Thank you. So many moving parts, it’s hard to keep up. Things are moving fast. This is wild.
Since it appears there are efforts to memory-hole this existing, here are some proofs:
https://youtu.be/AG9on3BjYck?t=11100 a live stream where the post in question is shown, prior to its deletion. The email address is in the lower part of the image in the post, that has the text 'dorsey sent a her a copy of my substack article blasting the incident'
Doing a search for this text shows all the sites that archived the whole thread, including the post that was deleted. One example is:
https://www.shacknews.com/article/133342/matt-taibbis-twitter-files-peel-back-the-curtain-on-moderation-bias-at-social-media-platform
You can see from the link here (confirmed by the other archive sites) that the deleted post in question is this one:
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598845423979884544
With the damaging nature of what was NOT deleted, you might well wonder why one referencing a clear pedo connection to @jack merited special treatment and an attempt at a coverup.
One of the tweets had @Jack using an email server with the address of "0.pizza". They deleted this tweet.
"Yeah, because".
Pretending to be psychic appeals to some people. Others, not so much.
He is just handing them more rope.
Their asses were scorching with the last bit. He'll give them time to cool before he starts again. That should hold off their shut down of the internet, and it makes them feel the pain longer.
Based on my own experience with national/international corporate media and political operatives, plus years of Q training, this guess resonates.
Could other reasons also be in play? Definitely. Again, from my experience, multiple reasons usually exist for decisions around every move especially in "you bet your life" games.
Thx.