Maricopa County taking weeks to count their votes when other states can count their entire state in just hours, warrants NO DOUBT about the outcome of the election.
It is laughable that so many machines and printers did not work on election day. Imagine going into your office one morning to work and 66% of the computers and printers failed to operate! Not believable short of sabotage. Not even negligence could cause so many electronic devices to fail . . .
NYT is just the rag version of CNN. People who read/watch either will forever be clueless sheep. Got a dumbass at work to base the opinion on. Always talking shit with CNN propaganda points.
The word “baseless” is a framing word, an editorial addition.
Real news organizations would simply report the claims of the conflicting parties. It should be up to the reader to determine, based on factual reporting, if a claim is baseless or not. It’s so gross.
Media is both the product and the source of Marxist, post-modern indoctrination. There is no truth but power.
I heard on a local radio station, this morning, that "ideology" (party politics) is not a protected class and this is the reason the courts did not hear any election fraud type incidents (2020). Maybe the conservatives should have sued on disenfranchisement issues rather than what they sued on. They, I believe, are smarter than the radio hosts and me, but who knows today. Kari Lake should sue on the right premise so her case will get to a court (maybe).
Thanks for your reply. As I said this was something I heard on a local radio talk show. I thought it made sense--I saw that you put disenfranchised voters in your headline, but I didn't think the lawsuits from Trump's 2020 were on the disenfranchised voter, and were on a protected class suit, which the talk show hosts (2 man show, morning) said that political, I used, ideology was not a protected class in the constitution. The were saying just because a party doesn't agree with you is not a reason to rule an election is fraud. I don't know if I cleared up what I was thinking or not, but I hope you get the point I tried to make. I am glad you responded to let me know the lawsuits were on states violating their own laws and not anything else. I agree the whole country was harmed. But for the Supreme Court to rule the president didn't have "standing" is, to me, totally ridiculous.
Maricopa County taking weeks to count their votes when other states can count their entire state in just hours, warrants NO DOUBT about the outcome of the election.
“Baseless doubts” 🤡
The propaganda rag can’t stop lying.
Delay in counting is by itself a huge red flag that the election is fraudulent. Plus you have:
Katie Hobbs ran the election for her election and then threatened people with felony charges if they didn't certify her election.
I really wish at least ONE person called her bluff about being charged with a felony. I would have loved to see that case go to court. Cowards.
Weak men create hard times. I'm still pretty shocked that they are gonna get away with it, but I can see the plan is us.
That or the whole board should have resigned in protest
I would've told her to go fuck herself on live TV.
Are all states using the exact same counting methods?
It is laughable that so many machines and printers did not work on election day. Imagine going into your office one morning to work and 66% of the computers and printers failed to operate! Not believable short of sabotage. Not even negligence could cause so many electronic devices to fail . . .
100% spot on...
LOL that's my favorite part of the movie.
What happens when many millions become Sick of being told their beliefs are baseless, worthless and conspiracy theories?
We are about to find out.
NYT proving without a shadow of a doubt. They are a bought and corrupted rag.
And whoever bought it paid too much! :)
Who actually reads this propaganda shit and believes it? Better yet, who still reads this rag?
Normies believe it all.
If the MSM told normies eating their own shit was healthy, they would and then criticize you for not doing it.
rAbBiTs dO iT
NYT is just the rag version of CNN. People who read/watch either will forever be clueless sheep. Got a dumbass at work to base the opinion on. Always talking shit with CNN propaganda points.
Trump should have labeled them better than failed new york times. Should have emphasized propaganda more.
Can definitely agree with that, as well as several other things that fall into that column for the same reason(s).
The word “baseless” is a framing word, an editorial addition. Real news organizations would simply report the claims of the conflicting parties. It should be up to the reader to determine, based on factual reporting, if a claim is baseless or not. It’s so gross. Media is both the product and the source of Marxist, post-modern indoctrination. There is no truth but power.
Baseless claims! It's baseless! I will tell you why with only a few points that support our theory that it is baseless.
Conspiracy MSM theories are getting pretty annoying.
I saw another news piece yesterday I think, that called us an "election denial community". lol
I heard on a local radio station, this morning, that "ideology" (party politics) is not a protected class and this is the reason the courts did not hear any election fraud type incidents (2020). Maybe the conservatives should have sued on disenfranchisement issues rather than what they sued on. They, I believe, are smarter than the radio hosts and me, but who knows today. Kari Lake should sue on the right premise so her case will get to a court (maybe).
Thanks for your reply. As I said this was something I heard on a local radio talk show. I thought it made sense--I saw that you put disenfranchised voters in your headline, but I didn't think the lawsuits from Trump's 2020 were on the disenfranchised voter, and were on a protected class suit, which the talk show hosts (2 man show, morning) said that political, I used, ideology was not a protected class in the constitution. The were saying just because a party doesn't agree with you is not a reason to rule an election is fraud. I don't know if I cleared up what I was thinking or not, but I hope you get the point I tried to make. I am glad you responded to let me know the lawsuits were on states violating their own laws and not anything else. I agree the whole country was harmed. But for the Supreme Court to rule the president didn't have "standing" is, to me, totally ridiculous.
"The New York Times apparently thinks..."
There's your first mistake, right there.
They love to say "baseless"